Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Codecov and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Codecov
Star Rating
(10)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CodecovVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the "Static Code Analysis" feature in Veracode Application Security Platform is highly effective, with a score of 9.3, indicating robust capabilities in identifying vulnerabilities early in the development process. In contrast, Codecov, while strong in "Code Analysis" with a score of 8.6, does not match the depth of Veracode's static analysis capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Veracode excels in "Vulnerability Scan" with a score of 8.8, providing thorough detection of security issues. Users on G2 highlight that Codecov's scanning capabilities, while effective, do not offer the same level of comprehensive vulnerability assessment, scoring lower in this area.
- G2 users appreciate Veracode's "Quality of Support" rating of 8.0, noting that the support team is responsive and helpful in resolving issues. Conversely, Codecov lacks a similar level of support feedback, which may impact user experience during critical security assessments.
- Users say that Veracode's "Ease of Setup" is a significant drawback, with a low score of 5.7, indicating that initial configuration can be complex. In contrast, Codecov is praised for its "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.1, making it more accessible for teams looking to implement quickly.
- Reviewers mention that Veracode's "API / Integrations" score of 7.9 reflects a solid but not exceptional integration capability, while Codecov shines with a high score of 9.2 in "Extensibility," allowing users to customize their workflows and integrate seamlessly with other tools.
- Users report that both platforms have their strengths in "Reporting and Analytics," with Veracode scoring 8.3 and Codecov matching that score. However, users highlight that Veracode's reports are more detailed and actionable, which can be crucial for compliance and security audits.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Codecov
No pricing availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Codecov
No trial information availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
7.8
6
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.1
6
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.4
7
Quality of Support
Not enough data
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
6
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Codecov and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Codecov has no unique categories
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as AI AppSec Assistants, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Scanner, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Codecov
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
50.0%
Research
10.0%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
10.0%
Logistics and Supply Chain
10.0%
Insurance
10.0%
Other
10.0%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Discussions
Codecov has no discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
