Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Codecov and SonarQube 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Codecov
Star Rating
(10)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CodecovSonarQube
Star Rating
(126)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SonarQube excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher score compared to Codecov. Users appreciate its simple deployment process, particularly highlighting the ease of installation on Kubernetes using YAML formats, which streamlines the setup for development teams.
- According to verified reviews, SonarQube provides robust code quality suggestions, helping developers identify potential errors and improve their code. Users mention that it offers secure code suggestions, which enhances the overall quality of their projects.
- Reviewers mention that Codecov, while having a lower satisfaction score, still delivers valuable features such as generating detailed reports on code coverage. Users find this functionality helpful for optimizing their code, especially in areas that are not covered by tests.
- Users say that SonarQube's integration with GitHub is seamless, allowing developers to conduct scans effortlessly through GitHub actions. This integration is praised for its fluency, making it easier for teams to maintain code quality throughout their development process.
- Reviewers highlight that Codecov is appreciated for its ease of use and quick integration capabilities. Many users enjoy the ready-to-use integrations that require minimal setup, making it a convenient choice for teams looking to implement code coverage solutions swiftly.
- G2 reviewers note that SonarQube's support quality is generally rated higher, with users expressing satisfaction with the assistance they receive. In contrast, Codecov has fewer reviews regarding support, which may indicate a need for improvement in this area to enhance user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Codecov
No pricing availableSonarQube
Cloud - based: Free
Free
For developers wanting to try SonarQube.
- Scan of private projects limited to 50k lines of code
- Users limited to max. 5
- Architecture management
Free Trial
Codecov
No trial information availableSonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.8
6
8.8
109
Ease of Use
8.1
6
8.5
112
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.1
71
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.5
63
Quality of Support
Not enough data
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
6
8.6
106
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
7.8
19
Not enough data
6.0
20
Analysis
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Testing
Not enough data
6.6
18
Not enough data
5.9
19
Not enough data
6.0
21
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
6.8
17
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
6.8
22
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.8
36
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Security
Not enough data
6.8
34
Not enough data
7.0
32
Not enough data
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Codecov and SonarQube are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Codecov has no unique categories
SonarQube is categorized as Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Secure Code Review, Software Development Analytics Tools, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Bug Tracking, Software Composition Analysis, Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), AI AppSec Assistants, and AI Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Codecov
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
50.0%
Research
10.0%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
10.0%
Logistics and Supply Chain
10.0%
Insurance
10.0%
Other
10.0%
Information Technology and Services
27.2%
Computer Software
21.6%
Financial Services
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.4%
Discussions
Codecov has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
