Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Codebase and Phabricator 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Octopus Deploy
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Codebase
Star Rating
(12)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CodebasePhabricator
Star Rating
(27)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PhabricatorSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Phabricator excels in its "Differential" code review feature, allowing for detailed feedback and collaboration, while Codebase's code review process is considered more straightforward but lacks some of the advanced functionalities.
- Reviewers mention that Phabricator's "Maniphest" task management system is robust, offering extensive customization options, whereas Codebase's task management is simpler and more user-friendly, appealing to smaller teams.
- G2 users highlight that Phabricator's "Harbormaster" build automation tool is powerful for continuous integration, but some users find it complex to set up compared to Codebase's more intuitive integration with CI/CD tools.
- Users on G2 say that Phabricator's reporting capabilities are comprehensive, providing detailed analytics on project progress, while Codebase offers basic reporting features that may not meet the needs of larger projects.
- Reviewers mention that Phabricator's extensibility through custom applications is a significant advantage for teams needing tailored solutions, while Codebase is praised for its ease of use and quick setup, making it ideal for smaller teams without extensive customization needs.
- Users report that Phabricator's bug tracking features, including "Audit" and "Bug Monitoring," are highly effective for larger teams, while Codebase's bug tracking is simpler and may not provide the depth required for more complex projects.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Codebase
No pricing availablePhabricator
No pricing availableFree Trial
Codebase
No trial information availablePhabricator
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
9
8.5
27
Ease of Use
9.3
9
8.4
27
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
6.3
15
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.2
14
Quality of Support
8.5
9
8.1
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
8
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
9
8.7
27
Features by Category
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Codebase and Phabricator are categorized as Version Control Hosting
Unique Categories
Codebase has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Codebase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Phabricator
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Research
8.3%
Pharmaceuticals
8.3%
Non-Profit Organization Management
8.3%
Medical Practice
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Computer Software
22.2%
Internet
18.5%
Retail
11.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.4%
Other
18.5%
Discussions
What are the benefits of sharing a common codebase?
1 Comment
SK
Improved code quality and Reduced development costsRead more
What is codebase structure?
1 Comment
SK
Create a README file for each directory and file and Use version control to track changes to the codeRead more
Codebase has no more discussions with answers
Phabricator has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
