Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Codat and Twilio Segment 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Nuix Neo Data Privacy
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Knit API
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
$120 Per month
Codat
Star Rating
(28)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 2 pricing plansTwilio Segment
Star Rating
(561)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$120 Per month
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Segment excels in "Data Enrichment" with a score of 8.6, allowing for enhanced customer insights, while Codat's focus on "Data Distribution" shines with a higher score of 9.1, making it a better choice for users needing efficient data sharing across platforms.
- Reviewers mention that Segment's "Integrations" feature is robust, scoring 9.1, which is crucial for businesses looking to connect various tools seamlessly. In contrast, Codat's integration capabilities with "Accounting Systems" and "ERP Systems" both score 8.4, indicating a more limited but still effective integration scope.
- G2 users highlight Segment's "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.8, making it user-friendly for teams without extensive technical expertise. However, Codat's "Ease of Setup" also scores 8.5, suggesting that both platforms are relatively easy to implement, but Segment may have a slight edge in overall usability.
- Users on G2 report that Codat's "Quality of Support" is particularly strong, with a score of 9.1, indicating that users feel well-supported during their experience. In comparison, Segment's support quality scores 8.6, which, while still good, may not match the level of assistance provided by Codat.
- Reviewers say that Segment's "Data Mapping - automated" feature scores 8.7, which is beneficial for users needing efficient data organization. Codat, however, offers a strong "Reporting and logs" feature with a score of 8.8, appealing to users who prioritize detailed data tracking and analysis.
- Users report that Segment's "Product Direction" is rated positively at 8.3, indicating a commitment to future improvements. In contrast, Codat boasts a perfect score of 10.0 in this area, suggesting that users have high confidence in Codat's ongoing development and innovation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Codat
Free
Free
Try and test Codat for free
- Access to test all accounting, banking and commerce integrations
- Create and test live integrations for up to 50 companies
- Test the Codat API with realistic unlimited sandbox data
Twilio Segment
Team
$120
Per month
- Base includes 10,000 MTU
- Unlimited Sources
- Unlimited Destinations
Free Trial
Codat
No trial information availableTwilio Segment
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
19
8.9
426
Ease of Use
8.6
18
8.7
428
Ease of Setup
8.5
8
8.5
244
Ease of Admin
8.6
7
8.9
237
Quality of Support
9.1
19
8.6
367
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
7
8.8
225
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
18
8.3
386
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.6
86
Not enough data
8.2
68
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.0
85
Management
Not enough data
8.2
43
Not enough data
8.5
52
Not enough data
8.6
49
Not enough data
8.1
48
Not enough data
8.6
46
Compliance
Not enough data
8.9
96
Not enough data
8.7
80
Not enough data
8.8
85
Not enough data
8.7
83
Security
Not enough data
9.0
56
Not enough data
8.4
54
Not enough data
8.9
50
Data Quality
Not enough data
8.7
99
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.3
98
Maintainence
Not enough data
9.0
53
Not enough data
8.7
46
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Agentic AI - Data Governance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Sourcing
Not enough data
8.5
142
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
146
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
138
|
Verified
Intelligence
Not enough data
8.0
122
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.9
85
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.7
29
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.0
28
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
9.1
24
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.5
18
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.7
20
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
8.7
18
Development
Not enough data
8.9
47
Not enough data
8.1
39
Management
Not enough data
8.0
46
Not enough data
8.6
43
Integration Options
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
8.5
20
Data Management
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
6.7
7
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
6.9
6
Security
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.8
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Codat and Twilio Segment are categorized as E-Commerce Data Integration
Unique Categories
Codat is categorized as Financial Data APIs and Unified APIs
Twilio Segment is categorized as Consent Management Platform (CMP), Data Subject Access Request (DSAR), Data Privacy Management, Data Governance, Customer Data Platform (CDP), and Reverse ETL
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Codat
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Twilio Segment
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
44.0%
Insurance
20.0%
Information Technology and Services
8.0%
Computer Software
8.0%
Venture Capital & Private Equity
4.0%
Other
16.0%
Computer Software
21.8%
Information Technology and Services
12.9%
Financial Services
8.9%
Internet
7.3%
Marketing and Advertising
5.3%
Other
43.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Codat has no discussions with answers
What is the best way to do QA of tracking implementation?
1 Comment
CR
My experience tells me that I always need to do end-to-end testing, just relying on that whenever an event ends up in segment, it will also end up in the...Read more
I used segment in different organizations as I was the one suggesting it, but then
1 Comment
AB
There is if you become a referral partner, but is an involved process with approval....Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
