Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Codacy and Pylint

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Codacy
Codacy
Star Rating
(28)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Pylint
Pylint
Star Rating
(19)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (44.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Pylint
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Codacy excels in its user-friendly interface, with a score of 9.2 for ease of use, making it accessible for teams of all sizes, while Pylint, with a score of 9.0, is slightly less intuitive for new users.
  • Reviewers mention that Codacy offers robust support with a quality rating of 9.2, which is significantly higher than Pylint's 8.3, indicating that users find Codacy more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
  • G2 users highlight Codacy's strong integration capabilities, particularly with CI/CD tools, which enhances its functionality in continuous integration environments, whereas Pylint's integration options are more limited, focusing primarily on Python projects.
  • Users on G2 appreciate Codacy's advanced reporting and analytics features, which provide detailed insights into code quality and vulnerabilities, while Pylint's reporting is more basic, lacking some of the depth that Codacy offers.
  • Reviewers say that Codacy's continuous monitoring feature is a standout, allowing teams to maintain code quality over time, while Pylint does not offer the same level of ongoing analysis, which can lead to missed issues in long-term projects.
  • Users report that Codacy's remediation suggestions are particularly helpful, providing actionable insights to improve code quality, whereas Pylint's suggestions can be less comprehensive, requiring more manual intervention from developers.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Codacy
Open Source
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Pylint
No pricing available
Free Trial
Codacy
Free Trial is available
Pylint
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
19
9.2
14
Ease of Use
9.2
20
9.0
14
Ease of Setup
9.1
13
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.9
12
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.2
14
8.3
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
20
10.0
14
Features by Category
Application ShieldingHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Protect
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Execute
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application SecurityHide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Code AnalysisHide 3 FeaturesShow 3 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Codacy
Codacy
Pylint
Pylint
Codacy and Pylint are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Codacy
Codacy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
63.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
18.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
18.5%
Pylint
Pylint
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
33.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
22.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
44.4%
Reviewers' Industry
Codacy
Codacy
Computer Software
29.6%
Information Technology and Services
14.8%
Program Development
7.4%
Financial Services
7.4%
Security and Investigations
3.7%
Other
37.0%
Pylint
Pylint
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Telecommunications
11.1%
Internet
11.1%
Semiconductors
5.6%
Other
16.7%
Alternatives
Codacy
Codacy Alternatives
SonarQube
SonarQube
Add SonarQube
Checkmarx
Checkmarx
Add Checkmarx
GitHub
GitHub
Add GitHub
Coverity
Coverity
Add Coverity
Pylint
Pylint Alternatives
SonarQube
SonarQube
Add SonarQube
Coverity
Coverity
Add Coverity
Gearset
Gearset
Add Gearset
FusionReactor APM
FusionReactor APM
Add FusionReactor APM
Discussions
Codacy
Codacy Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Codacy has no discussions with answers
Pylint
Pylint Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Pylint has no discussions with answers