Users report that Codacy excels in its user-friendly interface, with a score of 9.2 for ease of use, making it accessible for teams of all sizes, while Pylint, with a score of 9.0, is slightly less intuitive for new users.
Reviewers mention that Codacy offers robust support with a quality rating of 9.2, which is significantly higher than Pylint's 8.3, indicating that users find Codacy more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
G2 users highlight Codacy's strong integration capabilities, particularly with CI/CD tools, which enhances its functionality in continuous integration environments, whereas Pylint's integration options are more limited, focusing primarily on Python projects.
Users on G2 appreciate Codacy's advanced reporting and analytics features, which provide detailed insights into code quality and vulnerabilities, while Pylint's reporting is more basic, lacking some of the depth that Codacy offers.
Reviewers say that Codacy's continuous monitoring feature is a standout, allowing teams to maintain code quality over time, while Pylint does not offer the same level of ongoing analysis, which can lead to missed issues in long-term projects.
Users report that Codacy's remediation suggestions are particularly helpful, providing actionable insights to improve code quality, whereas Pylint's suggestions can be less comprehensive, requiring more manual intervention from developers.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Codacy
Open Source
Free
Unlimited free code scanning for open-source projects
Unlimited lines of code in public projects
Code quality and security scanning across 49 languages and frameworks
100% cloud-based analysis via Git - no server or build steps needed
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.