Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Codacy and Embold 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Waydev
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
cside
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (60.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free
Codacy
Star Rating
(28)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansEmbold
Star Rating
(18)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (60.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Codacy excels in Repository Integration with a score of 9.6, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for seamless integration with their existing repositories. In contrast, Embold does not provide a specific score for this feature, indicating a potential gap in integration capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Embold shines in Testing Integration, scoring 9.7, which is crucial for teams that prioritize continuous testing in their development workflow. Codacy, while strong in other areas, does not highlight this feature as prominently.
- G2 users highlight that Codacy's Analytics and Trends feature, with a score of 8.3, provides valuable insights into code quality over time, although some users feel it could be more intuitive. Embold's analytics capabilities are less emphasized, suggesting a potential area for improvement.
- Users on G2 report that both products have strong Ease of Use ratings, with Codacy at 9.2 and Embold at 9.4. However, reviewers mention that Embold's interface is slightly more user-friendly, making it easier for new users to navigate.
- Reviewers say that Codacy's Quality of Support is rated at 9.2, with many users praising the responsiveness of the support team. In comparison, Embold's support rating is slightly higher at 9.4, indicating a more favorable experience for users needing assistance.
- Users report that both products have a strong focus on Static Code Analysis, but Codacy's approach is noted for its thoroughness, while Embold is recognized for its speed in delivering results, which can be a deciding factor for teams under tight deadlines.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Codacy
Open Source
Free
Unlimited free code scanning for open-source projects
- Unlimited lines of code in public projects
- Code quality and security scanning across 49 languages and frameworks
- 100% cloud-based analysis via Git - no server or build steps needed
Embold
Free Cloud Package
Free
5 scans up to 50k LOC and 5 seats/users for free. Buy more LOC and seats/users as needed.
- scan your private repositories
- 5 scans
- 5 users
Free Trial
Codacy
Free Trial is available
Embold
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
19
8.9
12
Ease of Use
9.2
20
9.4
12
Ease of Setup
9.1
13
9.3
5
Ease of Admin
8.9
12
8.7
5
Quality of Support
9.2
14
9.4
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
9
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
20
8.1
12
Features by Category
Protect
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Execute
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Codacy and Embold are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Codacy is categorized as Application Shielding, Software Composition Analysis, and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Embold is categorized as Software Development Analytics Tools, Peer Code Review, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Codacy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Embold
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
29.6%
Information Technology and Services
14.8%
Program Development
7.4%
Financial Services
7.4%
Security and Investigations
3.7%
Other
37.0%
Computer Software
33.3%
Internet
13.3%
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Non-Profit Organization Management
6.7%
Marketing and Advertising
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Discussions
Codacy has no discussions with answers
What devices are supported?
2 Comments
MW
Depending on your subscription/model (cloud / on-premise), Embold has the following requirements:
https://docs.embold.io/system-requirements/Read more
What packages do you have?
1 Comment
MW
Embold offers different types of packages. These can be found here:
https://embold.io/pricingRead more
What browsers are supported?
1 Comment
MW
Embold support the following browser:
https://docs.embold.io/system-requirements/#supported-browsersRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
