Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CockroachDB and Neo4j Graph Database 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (55.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
CockroachDB
Star Rating
(29)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (55.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about CockroachDBNeo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in data modeling with a score of 8.6, allowing for complex relationships and graph structures, while CockroachDB, with a score of 7.7, is noted for its more traditional relational data model, which may not be as flexible for graph-based applications.
- Reviewers mention that CockroachDB shines in scalability, achieving a score of 9.4, which is particularly beneficial for applications requiring high availability and distributed data, whereas Neo4j's scalability score of 7.9 indicates it may not handle large-scale deployments as effectively.
- G2 users highlight the quality of support for CockroachDB, scoring 9.0, which is praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness, while Neo4j's support score of 8.5, although good, may not match the level of service provided by CockroachDB.
- Users on G2 report that Neo4j's query language is highly intuitive and powerful for graph queries, scoring 8.6, which is a significant advantage for developers working with complex data relationships, while CockroachDB's query language, although functional, does not offer the same level of graph-specific capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that CockroachDB's disaster recovery features are robust, with a score of 9.2, ensuring data integrity and availability, while Neo4j's disaster recovery capabilities, although present, do not receive the same level of acclaim, scoring lower in this critical area.
- Users say that Neo4j's built-in search functionality, scoring 8.0, is beneficial for applications needing quick access to graph data, while CockroachDB's search capabilities are less emphasized, indicating a potential gap for users requiring advanced search features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CockroachDB
No pricing availableNeo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Free Trial
CockroachDB
Free Trial is available
Neo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
23
8.5
73
Ease of Use
8.9
24
8.2
75
Ease of Setup
9.0
14
8.7
31
Ease of Admin
9.1
9
8.0
28
Quality of Support
9.0
21
8.5
64
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
8
8.8
24
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
21
9.0
68
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
Support
6.7
8
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Security
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
Performance
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
Database Features
8.7
15
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Availability
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Performance
Not enough data
7.4
19
Security
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Support
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Data Indexing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Filters
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.5
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
7.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
Availability
8.7
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
Security
6.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
6.5
8
Not enough data
Data Management
9.4
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CockroachDB and Neo4j Graph Database are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS) and Database Management Systems (DBMS)
Unique Categories
CockroachDB is categorized as Relational Databases and Vector Database
Neo4j Graph Database is categorized as Graph Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CockroachDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
29.6%
Information Technology and Services
18.5%
Financial Services
14.8%
Telecommunications
3.7%
Retail
3.7%
Other
29.6%
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
CockroachDB has no discussions with answers
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What companies use neo4j?
1 Comment
Official Response from Neo4j Graph Database
Great question. This page https://neo4j.com/customers/ has a shortlist of referenceable customers. Comcast, eBay, Adobe, and Microsoft, to name a few. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
