Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CockroachDB and Google Cloud Spanner 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (55.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
CockroachDB
Star Rating
(29)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (55.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about CockroachDBGoogle Cloud Spanner
Star Rating
(35)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud SpannerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Google Cloud Spanner excels in scalability with a score of 8.8, allowing businesses to handle large volumes of transactions seamlessly, while CockroachDB scores slightly higher at 8.9, indicating its strong performance in scaling across distributed environments.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Spanner's data replication feature is robust, scoring 9.3, which ensures high availability and consistency across multiple regions. In contrast, CockroachDB also offers solid data replication but does not have a specific score listed, suggesting it may not be as highly rated in this area.
- G2 users highlight that Google Cloud Spanner's disaster recovery capabilities are rated at 7.8, which some users find lacking compared to CockroachDB's impressive score of 9.2, indicating a more reliable recovery process in case of failures.
- Users on G2 appreciate the ease of setup for CockroachDB, which scores 8.9, making it user-friendly for new adopters. Google Cloud Spanner, while still decent at 8.3, may require more configuration, which could be a consideration for teams looking for quick deployment.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Spanner shines in its application performance with a score of 8.2, but CockroachDB's score of 7.8 suggests it may not perform as well under heavy workloads, which could impact user experience during peak times.
- Users say that Google Cloud Spanner's security features, particularly its data encryption, are highly rated at 9.4, providing peace of mind for enterprises. CockroachDB, while still secure, has a lower score of 7.7 in this area, indicating potential vulnerabilities that users should consider.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CockroachDB
No pricing availableGoogle Cloud Spanner
No pricing availableFree Trial
CockroachDB
Free Trial is available
Google Cloud Spanner
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
23
8.7
24
Ease of Use
8.9
24
7.8
24
Ease of Setup
9.0
14
8.2
10
Ease of Admin
9.1
9
8.7
9
Quality of Support
9.0
21
8.6
20
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
8
8.3
10
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
21
8.4
22
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.1
9
8.1
6
8.1
9
8.9
6
8.7
10
9.2
6
8.8
7
9.2
6
Support
6.7
8
8.7
5
7.8
10
8.3
6
7.3
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
8.6
6
Security
8.5
8
8.7
5
8.9
9
8.7
5
7.6
7
9.4
6
8.3
9
9.2
6
Performance
8.5
9
7.8
6
7.9
8
9.2
6
8.1
8
8.9
6
7.9
7
7.5
6
7.3
8
8.7
5
Database Features
8.7
15
9.5
13
9.1
15
8.6
13
8.7
15
9.0
13
9.2
13
9.2
13
8.0
14
8.9
12
8.1
14
8.3
13
8.5
14
8.6
13
Data Indexing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Filters
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.5
10
8.2
10
9.0
10
7.6
9
8.8
10
7.3
10
7.2
10
8.1
8
8.2
10
8.1
8
Database Administration
8.3
9
8.2
10
8.3
8
6.3
10
8.1
8
7.0
10
Availability
8.7
10
8.8
10
9.0
10
6.7
9
8.8
8
7.0
10
8.3
10
8.1
9
Security
6.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
6.5
8
Not enough data
Data Management
9.4
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CockroachDB and Google Cloud Spanner are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS) and Relational Databases
Unique Categories
CockroachDB is categorized as Database Management Systems (DBMS) and Vector Database
Google Cloud Spanner has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CockroachDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Google Cloud Spanner
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
29.6%
Information Technology and Services
18.5%
Financial Services
14.8%
Telecommunications
3.7%
Retail
3.7%
Other
29.6%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Biotechnology
6.7%
Sports
3.3%
Other
46.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
CockroachDB has no discussions with answers
Google Cloud Spanner has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
