G2 reviewers report that Cobalt excels in user experience, particularly highlighting its speed of scheduling and execution. Users appreciate the quality of reports generated, which are noted for their thoroughness and clarity, making it a preferred choice for external pentesting.
Users say that Pentera offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the vulnerability scanning process. Many find it easy to navigate and appreciate the automation features that save time compared to manual methods, allowing teams to run more scans efficiently.
According to verified reviews, Cobalt's implementation process is praised for its intuitive onboarding, which helps teams get up and running quickly. This contrasts with Pentera, where some users have noted challenges during setup, indicating a steeper learning curve.
Reviewers mention that both products provide strong support, but Cobalt stands out slightly with its quality of support ratings. Users have expressed satisfaction with Cobalt's responsiveness and expertise, particularly in automating pen testing as a service.
G2 reviewers highlight that while both products have similar star ratings, Cobalt's higher overall G2 Score reflects a broader consensus of satisfaction among users. This is bolstered by a greater number of recent reviews, indicating that Cobalt is consistently meeting user needs.
Users report that Cobalt's reporting and analytics capabilities are particularly robust, with many praising its ability to provide realistic attack simulations. In comparison, while Pentera offers valuable remediation suggestions, some users feel its reporting features could be enhanced further.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cobalt
Standard
Contact Us
For teams in need of a speedy, annual pentest to meet a compliance need or client request.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.