Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cobalt and Detectify 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hackrate Ethical Hacking Platform
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sprocket Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (47.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Contact Us
Cobalt
Star Rating
(147)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Browse all 3 pricing plansDetectify
Star Rating
(51)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Detectify excels in Asset Discovery with a perfect score of 10.0, making it a standout feature for organizations looking to identify and manage their assets effectively. In contrast, Cobalt's asset management features are less emphasized, which may leave some users wanting more in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Detectify's Automated Scans receive a high score of 8.9, indicating a robust capability for continuous security assessments. However, Cobalt's automated scanning features, while still effective, score slightly lower at 8.3, suggesting that Detectify may provide a more comprehensive automated scanning experience.
- G2 users highlight that Cobalt shines in Reporting and Analytics, scoring 9.3 compared to Detectify's 8.8. This suggests that Cobalt offers more detailed insights and analytics capabilities, which can be crucial for organizations needing to track and report on security metrics effectively.
- Users on G2 report that Detectify has a lower score for False Positives at 6.3, indicating that users may experience more irrelevant alerts compared to Cobalt, which scores 8.3. This difference can significantly impact the efficiency of security teams in managing alerts and prioritizing responses.
- Reviewers mention that Cobalt's Ease of Admin is rated at 9.3, which suggests a more user-friendly administrative experience compared to Detectify's score of 8.7. This could be a deciding factor for teams looking for a solution that minimizes administrative overhead.
- Users say that Detectify's Vulnerability Assessment features score 8.0, which may not be as comprehensive as Cobalt's offerings, which are rated higher. This could influence organizations that prioritize thorough vulnerability assessments in their security strategy.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cobalt
Standard
Contact Us
For teams in need of a speedy, annual pentest to meet a compliance need or client request.
- SAML-Based SSO
- User And Group Access Controls
- Best Practice Methodology + Coverage Checklist
Detectify
Full EASM solution
Contact Us
Designed for large organizations, this scalable package offers broader coverage of your external attack surface, is made for easy and flexible roll-out, and provides additional Enterprise support.
- Advanced API functionality and easy domain verification
- Extended authentication control with SSO access and 2FA
- Multi team set-up for flexible organizing of assets, access levels and results
Free Trial
Cobalt
No trial information availableDetectify
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
113
8.7
34
Ease of Use
9.2
115
9.0
35
Ease of Setup
9.1
104
9.2
25
Ease of Admin
9.2
80
8.7
26
Quality of Support
9.2
113
9.4
31
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
81
9.7
24
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
105
7.7
31
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
9.2
14
Risk Analysis
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
8.2
11
Threat Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.0
75
8.0
5
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
85
8.8
7
Analysis
9.0
83
7.8
6
8.8
84
9.2
8
8.7
72
9.3
9
Testing
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
8.3
81
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
9.7
6
9.1
85
9.5
7
Administration
8.6
7
7.6
7
8.6
7
6.7
5
Analysis
9.0
7
7.3
10
9.0
7
6.5
8
8.8
7
Feature Not Available
9.0
7
9.2
10
8.6
7
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
7
Feature Not Available
8.9
6
9.0
5
8.8
7
Feature Not Available
8.3
7
9.0
10
8.6
7
7.9
11
8.6
7
5.8
11
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
6.3
19
Not enough data
8.9
20
Network
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.3
10
Application
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.5
9
Not enough data
8.2
14
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Asset Management
Not enough data
10.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
10.0
6
Risk Management
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Identification and Assessment - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring and Integration - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cobalt and Detectify are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and Penetration Testing
Unique Categories
Cobalt is categorized as Crowd Testing Tools
Detectify is categorized as Website Security, Vulnerability Scanner, Exposure Management Platforms, and Attack Surface Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cobalt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Detectify
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
26.8%
Information Technology and Services
21.1%
Financial Services
6.3%
Hospital & Health Care
4.9%
Telecommunications
2.8%
Other
38.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.8%
Computer Software
14.6%
Computer & Network Security
6.3%
Retail
4.2%
Higher Education
4.2%
Other
50.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Cobalt has no discussions with answers
Do we have a solution to exclude or tag the findings that have been already reviewed?
1 Comment
Official Response from Detectify
Hi Francesco,
Thanks for your question. In the deep scan results you can tag findings as "fixed". There you can also filter by the "new" tag. To be able...Read more
Detectify has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
