Users report that CMake has a steeper learning curve compared to SCons, with a rating of 6.6 for ease of use, while SCons shines with an 8.3 rating, making it more accessible for new users.
Reviewers mention that CMake's quality of support is rated at 7.2, which is slightly better than SCons's 6.9, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when using CMake.
G2 users highlight that CMake is particularly strong in enterprise environments, with 41.2% of reviews coming from this segment, while SCons is favored in mid-market settings, suggesting that CMake may be better suited for larger organizations.
Users on G2 report that CMake's product direction is rated at 7.1, which is lower than SCons's 8.2, indicating that users feel more optimistic about the future development and enhancements of SCons.
Reviewers say that both products have the same total number of reviews (17), but CMake's higher star rating of 4.3 compared to SCons's 4.1 suggests a more favorable overall perception among users.
Users report that CMake's ability to handle complex build configurations is a standout feature, while SCons is praised for its simplicity and ease of setup, making it a preferred choice for smaller projects.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CMake
No pricing available
SCons
No pricing available
Free Trial
CMake
No trial information available
SCons
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
16
8.6
12
Ease of Use
6.6
16
8.3
13
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.2
10
6.9
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.