Users report that Cloudera excels in Data Processing with a score of 8.7, while Confluent shines in Real-Time Processing with a score of 9.0, indicating that users find Confluent more effective for real-time data needs.
Reviewers mention that Cloudera's Data Integration capabilities are robust, scoring 8.8, but Confluent's Real-Time Analytics feature stands out with a score of 8.9, suggesting that users appreciate its ability to analyze data as it streams.
G2 users highlight that Cloudera has a strong Hadoop Integration score of 8.7, making it a preferred choice for organizations heavily invested in Hadoop ecosystems, whereas Confluent's integration with Spark is rated slightly higher at 8.2, appealing to users who prioritize Spark compatibility.
Users on G2 report that Cloudera's Data Management features, particularly in Data Lake management, score 8.1, while Confluent's score of 8.3 indicates a more favorable user experience in managing data lakes.
Reviewers mention that Cloudera's Quality of Support is rated lower at 6.9, which may lead to frustration for users needing assistance, while Confluent's support quality is rated at 8.3, suggesting a more reliable support experience.
Users say that Cloudera's Customization options are rated at 8.5, allowing for tailored solutions, while Confluent's score of 8.3 indicates solid customization but may not be as flexible as Cloudera in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cloudera
No pricing available
Confluent
No pricing available
Free Trial
Cloudera
No trial information available
Confluent
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
30
8.7
87
Ease of Use
7.7
30
8.4
88
Ease of Setup
7.8
18
8.2
38
Ease of Admin
7.2
18
8.1
38
Quality of Support
6.9
26
8.3
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.