Link copied to clipboard # CLion vs KDevelop Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/clion/kdevelop/export.csv) CLionKDevelop[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **CLion** Free Trial **$19.99** Per User Per Month · Basic **KDevelop** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **CLion** $$$$$ **KDevelop** Not enough reviews yet Average Discount **CLion** Not enough reviews yet **KDevelop** Not enough reviews yet Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **CLion** 6 months Based on 100 responses **KDevelop** 6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **CLion** 6 months Based on 100 responses **KDevelop** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Pros & Cons** from reviews **CLion** Not enough data **KDevelop** Not enough data Screenshots **CLion** ![CLion screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/36731/Screenshot-2023-12-01-at-13.26.42.png) **KDevelop** ![KDevelop screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/37756/KDevelop_Screenshot-3.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **CLion** **8.9** /10 Based on 51 responses **KDevelop** **9.2** /10 Based on 8 responses Ease of Use **CLion** **8.4** /10 Based on 51 responses **KDevelop** **9.0** /10 Based on 8 responses Ease of Setup **CLion** Not enough data **KDevelop** Not enough data Ease of Admin **CLion** Not enough data **KDevelop** Not enough data Quality of Support **CLion** **7.9** /10 Based on 29 responses **KDevelop** **8.0** /10 Based on 5 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **CLion** Not enough data **KDevelop** Not enough data Product Direction (% positive) **CLion** **9.8** /10 Based on 49 responses **KDevelop** **8.5** /10 Based on 8 responses **Features** ratings from reviews C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE) **8.2** /10 Based on 30 responses Not enough data User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 60.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 20.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 18.9% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 60.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 20.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 18.9% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 50.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 20.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 30.0% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 50.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 20.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 30.0% **Reviewers' Industry** [![CLion](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/fd3f7b61a619d7c2a7a9af28834ccc10/clion.svg "CLion")](https://www.g2.com/products/clion/reviews) CLion Computer Software 32.1% Information Technology and Services 9.4% Higher Education 9.4% Research 5.7% Internet 5.7% Other 37.7% [![KDevelop](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_5934623ed0656739e662f442fc913407/kdevelop.png "KDevelop")](https://www.g2.com/products/kdevelop/reviews) KDevelop Computer Software 30.0% Information Technology and Services 20.0% Renewables & Environment 10.0% Medical Devices 10.0% Marketing and Advertising 10.0% Other 20.0% Alternatives **CLion Alternatives** ![Visual Studio](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/646c72569089375221819d6efbe819a0/visual-studio.svg "Visual Studio") [ Visual Studio ](/products/visual-studio/reviews) ![Eclipse](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/99f6b354a419d817b55329e62b0ea83f/eclipse.svg "Eclipse") [ Eclipse ](/products/eclipse/reviews) ![Xcode](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1487565953/xcode.svg "Xcode") [ Xcode ](/products/xcode/reviews) ![NetBeans](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1487565581/netbeans.svg "NetBeans") [ NetBeans ](/products/netbeans/reviews) **KDevelop Alternatives** ![Qt Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/b2899396eaa9cffe3357a0fe23e7a35e/qt-platform.svg "Qt Platform") [ Qt ](/products/qt-platform/reviews) ![Eclipse](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/99f6b354a419d817b55329e62b0ea83f/eclipse.svg "Eclipse") [ Eclipse ](/products/eclipse/reviews) ![Visual Studio](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/646c72569089375221819d6efbe819a0/visual-studio.svg "Visual Studio") [ Visual Studio ](/products/visual-studio/reviews) ![Code::Blocks](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_3ce3fb0a2f4ed7db412496427fabdc75/code-blocks.jpg "Code::Blocks") [ Code::Blocks ](/products/code-blocks/reviews) ## CLion vs KDevelop FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 14, 2026 ### What is the difference between KDevelop vs CLion? KDevelop stands out for its higher G2 rating and ease of use, while CLion is noted for its robust feature set and integrations. | [KDevelop](https://www.g2.com/products/kdevelop/reviews) | [CLion](https://www.g2.com/products/clion/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.6/5 (10 reviews) | 4.4/5 (55 reviews) | | — | — | | 7.0 | 7.0 | | 8.0 | 7.9 | | Free, open-source, highly extensible with plugins | Powerful integrations, strong C++ support, robust refactoring tools | ### How do the pricing models of KDevelop and CLion compare? KDevelop is considered the stronger value due to its free and open-source model, while CLion is praised for its reasonable pricing and feature set. - **KDevelop:** Reviewers highlight that KDevelop is free to use and open-source, making it highly attractive for cost-conscious buyers. - **CLion:** Reviewers describe CLion as offering a reasonable cost for its robust feature set, with additional praise for its free student license and affordable plans. ### What are the best alternatives to KDevelop and CLion? The top three alternatives to KDevelop and CLion are Visual Studio, Qt, and Eclipse. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [KDevelop](https://www.g2.com/products/kdevelop/reviews) | 4.6/5 (10 reviews) | — | Free and open-source | Highly extensible with plugins | | [CLion](https://www.g2.com/products/clion/reviews) | 4.4/5 (55 reviews) | — | Reasonable cost, free student license | Robust C++ support and integrations | | [Visual Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/visual-studio/reviews) | 4.5/5 (4004 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Comprehensive development environment | | [Qt](https://www.g2.com/products/qt/reviews) | 4.3/5 (54 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Strong cross-platform capabilities | | [Eclipse](https://www.g2.com/products/eclipse/reviews) | 4.3/5 (3221 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Extensive plugin ecosystem | ### Which C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE) features should I prioritize when comparing KDevelop and CLion? Buyers should prioritize extensibility, code navigation, debugger quality, integrations, and ease of use when comparing KDevelop and CLion. - **Extensibility:** KDevelop is highly extensible with plugins, as cited in multiple reviews; CLion also offers a wide range of plugins and integrations. - **Code Navigation:** KDevelop scores 9.0 on Ease of Use, with reviewers praising its smooth code navigation; CLion scores 8.4 and is noted for intuitive navigation and refactoring tools. - **Debugger Quality:** Both products are praised for their GUI debuggers, with KDevelop reviewers highlighting its superiority over gdb and CLion reviewers noting robust debugging features. - **Integrations:** CLion is frequently cited for its strong integration with CMake, Git, and other JetBrains tools; KDevelop is noted for Git and CMake integration. - **Ease of Use:** KDevelop leads with a 9.0 Ease of Use score, while CLion follows at 8.4. ### What are the pros and cons of KDevelop vs CLion? KDevelop's headline strength is its free, open-source extensibility, while CLion's is its robust feature set and integrations. - **KDevelop strengths:** Free and open-source, highly extensible with plugins, strong code navigation, smooth integration with Git and CMake, user-friendly GUI, lightweight and fast for large projects. - **KDevelop trade-offs:** Occasional slowness during project scanning, setup can be difficult on Windows, search feature needs improvement, average documentation and support forums. - **CLion strengths:** Powerful C++ support, robust refactoring and code navigation, strong integration with CMake and JetBrains ecosystem, real-time collaboration, optimized auto-completion, cross-platform support, affordable plans and free student license. - **CLion trade-offs:** No built-in compiler, requires external compiler setup, integration with GitHub and GitLab could be improved, can be slow with large projects, limited to CMake for build systems, plugin addition can be buggy, some UI elements could be more intuitive. ### Is KDevelop or CLion better for small businesses? KDevelop is the better fit for small businesses due to its free, open-source model and positive sentiment from small-business reviewers. - **KDevelop:** Small-business reviewers highlight the value of a free, open-source IDE with strong extensibility and ease of use. - **CLion:** Small-business reviewers appreciate the affordable pricing and robust feature set, but note the need for external compiler setup and some integration challenges. ### Which C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE) platform has better integrations? CLion is favored for integrations, with reviewers frequently citing its strong ecosystem and plugin support. - **KDevelop:** Reviewers mention integration with Git and CMake, as well as support for multiple languages and version control systems. - **CLion:** Reviewers highlight integration with CMake, Git, and other JetBrains tools, with frequent praise for its plugin ecosystem and compatibility with popular development tools. ### How do KDevelop and CLion compare on customer support? KDevelop and CLion are at near-parity on Quality of Support, with scores of 8.0 and 7.9 respectively, indicating similar reviewer satisfaction. - **KDevelop:** Reviewers describe support as generally positive, though some mention slow or average documentation and support forums. - **CLion:** Reviewers note responsive support and helpful documentation, with some citing room for improvement in integration and setup guidance. ### Which is easier to implement, KDevelop or CLion? KDevelop and CLion score equally on Ease of Setup at 7.0, indicating parity in implementation experience. - **KDevelop:** Reviewers describe a user-friendly GUI and almost zero learning curve, though setup on Windows can be more challenging. - **CLion:** Reviewers mention easy installation and a familiar interface for JetBrains users, but note that initial setup, especially compiler configuration, can be complex for beginners. ### Which product has better File Management? CLion is less favored for File Management compared to KDevelop, with reviewers noting issues in recent feedback. - **KDevelop:** Reviewers highlight smooth code navigation and efficient handling of large projects, with a 9.0 Ease of Use score supporting positive file management experiences. - **CLion:** Recent reviews mention that the file management system does not work very well, despite an 8.4 Ease of Use score. ## CLion vs KDevelop - Reviewers felt that KDevelop meets the needs of their business better than CLion. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that KDevelop is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of CLion over KDevelop.