Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ClickHouse and Neo4j Graph Database 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $1.00 Per Month
Free
ClickHouse
Star Rating
(20)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $1.00 Per Month
Learn more about ClickHouseNeo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in data modeling with a score of 9.4, allowing for complex relationships to be easily represented, while ClickHouse, with a score of 7.7, is noted for its limitations in handling intricate data models.
- Reviewers mention that Neo4j's query language, Cypher, is highly intuitive and powerful, scoring 9.3, which enhances user experience, whereas ClickHouse's SQL-like query language, while functional, does not offer the same level of expressiveness, scoring slightly lower at 8.2.
- G2 users highlight Neo4j's strong performance in data replication with a score of 7.9, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity across distributed systems, while ClickHouse's replication features are rated lower, indicating potential challenges in data consistency.
- Users on G2 emphasize that Neo4j provides robust support for ACID compliance, which is essential for transactional integrity, while ClickHouse, although it offers some level of ACID support, does not fully meet the same standards, leading to concerns about data reliability.
- Reviewers mention that ClickHouse shines in query performance with lower query latency, scoring 9.0, making it ideal for analytical workloads, while Neo4j, although effective, does not match this performance level, particularly in large-scale data queries.
- Users say that Neo4j's built-in search capabilities, rated at 8.0, enhance the ability to find and traverse data efficiently, while ClickHouse's search features, although functional, do not provide the same level of integration and ease of use, leading to a less seamless experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ClickHouse
ClickHouse Pricing
Starting at $1.00
Per Month
Options for every user, organization, and use case.
- Up to 1 TB storage
- 16 GiB total memory
- Burstable CPU
Neo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Free Trial
ClickHouse
No trial information availableNeo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
11
8.5
73
Ease of Use
8.6
11
8.2
75
Ease of Setup
9.0
7
8.7
31
Ease of Admin
7.0
5
8.0
28
Quality of Support
8.7
9
8.5
64
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.8
24
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
10
9.0
68
Features by Category
Management
9.4
6
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
10.0
5
Not enough data
Maintenance
8.8
7
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Availability
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Performance
Not enough data
7.4
19
Security
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Support
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Storage
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
Availability
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Performance
8.1
6
Not enough data
Security
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ClickHouse and Neo4j Graph Database are categorized as Database Management Systems (DBMS)
Unique Categories
ClickHouse is categorized as Real-time Analytic Database, Relational Databases, and Columnar Databases
Neo4j Graph Database is categorized as Graph Databases and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ClickHouse
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
31.6%
Computer Software
21.1%
Wholesale
5.3%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Marketing and Advertising
5.3%
Other
31.6%
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
ClickHouse has no discussions with answers
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What are some of the benefits provided by the neo4j DBMS?
1 Comment
SS
Very easy to grow database schema over timeRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
