Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Clang and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Clang
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ClangVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the "Ease of Setup" for Veracode Application Security Platform is notably lower, with a score of 5.7, indicating a more complex initial configuration process compared to Clang, which has a higher ease of setup rating, making it more user-friendly for new adopters.
- Reviewers mention that Veracode excels in "Static Code Analysis" with a score of 9.3, highlighting its robust capabilities in identifying vulnerabilities in code, while Clang, although strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.6, suggesting that Veracode may provide more comprehensive insights in this area.
- G2 users indicate that Clang shines in "Extensibility" with a score of 9.2, allowing for greater customization and integration with other tools, whereas Veracode's extensibility features are less emphasized, which may limit its adaptability in diverse environments.
- Users on G2 report that Veracode's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.0, which is competitive, but Clang edges ahead with an 8.3 rating, suggesting that users may find more responsive and helpful support when using Clang.
- Reviewers mention that Clang has a higher "Detection Rate" at 8.0, which implies it may be more effective at identifying security issues compared to Veracode, which has a lower detection rate, potentially leading to missed vulnerabilities.
- Users say that Veracode's "Product Direction" score of 6.3 indicates some concerns about its future development and feature enhancements, while Clang's perfect score of 10.0 suggests a strong commitment to continuous improvement and innovation, making it a more future-proof choice for buyers.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Clang
No pricing availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Clang
No trial information availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.7
15
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.2
15
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.4
7
Quality of Support
8.3
11
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
15
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Clang and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Clang has no unique categories
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Scanner, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Clang
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.8%
Computer Software
18.8%
Information Services
12.5%
Banking
12.5%
Research
6.3%
Other
31.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Discussions
Clang has no discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
