Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Clang and Coverity 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Clang
Star Rating
(16)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ClangCoverity
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CoveritySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Coverity excels in static code analysis with a score of 9.2, which reviewers mention helps in identifying critical vulnerabilities early in the development process. In contrast, Clang, while strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.9 in code analysis, indicating it may not catch as many issues upfront.
- Reviewers mention that Coverity's documentation is highly rated at 9.3 for both feedback and prioritization, making it easier for teams to understand and implement the tool effectively. Clang, however, does not have the same level of documentation support, which users say can lead to confusion during setup and usage.
- G2 users highlight that Coverity's API and integrations score 8.3, allowing for better connectivity with other tools in the development pipeline. In comparison, Clang's extensibility is rated at 9.0, which users say provides more flexibility for custom development, but may require more effort to integrate with existing systems.
- Users on G2 report that Coverity has a higher quality of support with a score of 8.6, which reviewers say is crucial for resolving issues quickly. Clang's support is rated at 8.3, which, while still good, may not be as responsive or comprehensive as Coverity's offerings.
- Reviewers mention that Coverity's product direction is rated at 7.7, indicating some concerns about future updates and features. In contrast, Clang boasts a perfect score of 10.0 in this area, with users saying they feel confident in the ongoing development and enhancement of the tool.
- Users report that Coverity's false positives score is 7.0, which some reviewers say can lead to unnecessary distractions during the development process. Clang, with a slightly better score of 7.6, is noted by users as having a more refined detection mechanism, reducing the noise in the analysis results.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Clang
No pricing availableCoverity
No pricing availableFree Trial
Clang
No trial information availableCoverity
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.7
15
8.9
43
Ease of Use
8.2
15
8.4
43
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.2
19
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.2
19
Quality of Support
8.3
11
8.6
37
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.1
18
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
15
7.7
40
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.0
12
Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Testing
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
7.6
12
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Security
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Clang and Coverity are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Clang has no unique categories
Coverity is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Clang
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Coverity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.8%
Computer Software
18.8%
Information Services
12.5%
Banking
12.5%
Research
6.3%
Other
31.3%
Computer Software
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Semiconductors
5.5%
Other
29.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Clang has no discussions with answers
Coverity has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
