# Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs RefWorks Comparison --- ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What is the difference between RefWorks vs Cite This For Me (formerly...? Cite This For Me (formerly...) stands out from RefWorks with a higher G2 rating and stronger reviewer sentiment on meeting requirements, while RefWorks is more frequently used in enterprise settings and scores higher on support. | [RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/products/refworks/reviews) | [Cite This For Me (formerly...)](https://www.g2.com/products/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 3.9/5 (29 reviews) | 4.6/5 (22 reviews) | | Enterprise | Mid-Market | | 7.0 | 6.0 | | 8.2 | 7.1 | | Strong integration with Google Scholar and Microsoft Word | Highly rated for ease of use and multiple citation formats | ### How do the pricing models of RefWorks and Cite This For Me (formerly... compare? Cite This For Me (formerly...) is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its price and cost structure compared to RefWorks. - **RefWorks:** Reviewers note that RefWorks can be expensive for individual users and cite the short trial period as a drawback. - **Cite This For Me (formerly...):** Reviewers appreciate the free version for basic citation needs but mention that the premium version is considered costly and is required to remove ads and access advanced features. ### What are the best alternatives to RefWorks and Cite This For Me (formerly...? The top three alternatives to RefWorks and Cite This For Me (formerly...) are Mendeley, EndNote, and Zotero. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/products/refworks/reviews) | 3.9/5 (29) | Enterprise | Reviewers cite high cost for individuals | Integration with Google Scholar and Word | | [Cite This For Me (formerly...)](https://www.g2.com/products/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme/reviews) | 4.6/5 (22) | Mid-Market | Free version available, premium considered costly | Multiple citation formats, ease of use | | [Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/reviews) | 4.3/5 (250) | Enterprise | — | Robust academic collaboration features | | [EndNote](https://www.g2.com/products/endnote/reviews) | 4.1/5 (183) | Enterprise | — | Comprehensive reference management | | [Zotero](https://www.g2.com/products/zotero/reviews) | 4.4/5 (99) | Small-Business | — | Open-source and flexible for individual researchers | ### Which Reference Management features should I prioritize when comparing RefWorks and Cite This For Me (formerly...? Buyers comparing RefWorks and Cite This For Me (formerly...) should prioritize citation format coverage, integration with writing tools, ease of use, support quality, and cost structure. - **Citation format coverage:** Cite This For Me (formerly...) is highly rated for supporting multiple citation styles, while RefWorks supports major academic formats. - **Integration with writing tools:** RefWorks is frequently cited for its integration with Google Scholar and Microsoft Word; Cite This For Me (formerly...) reviewers request better Word integration. - **Ease of use:** RefWorks scores 8.1 and Cite This For Me (formerly...) scores 8.0 on Ease of Use, indicating near parity. - **Support quality:** RefWorks scores 8.2 and Cite This For Me (formerly...) scores 7.1 on Quality of Support, favoring RefWorks. - **Cost structure:** Cite This For Me (formerly...) is praised for its free version, while RefWorks is noted as expensive for individuals. ### What are the pros and cons of RefWorks vs Cite This For Me (formerly...? RefWorks is strongest for integration with academic tools, while Cite This For Me (formerly...) excels in ease of use and citation format variety. - **RefWorks strengths:** Integration with Google Scholar and Microsoft Word, ability to organize sources and generate bibliographies in multiple styles, strong support for academic workflows. - **RefWorks trade-offs:** Reviewers cite a dated interface, limited customization, occasional technical issues with Word integration, and higher cost for individuals. - **Cite This For Me (formerly...) strengths:** High ease of use, broad citation format support (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago), fast citation generation, and a free version for basic needs. - **Cite This For Me (formerly...) trade-offs:** Reviewers mention intrusive ads in the free version, premium features considered costly, and requests for better integration with Microsoft Word. ### Is RefWorks or Cite This For Me (formerly... better for small businesses? Zotero is the leading small-business fit among the top alternatives, but between RefWorks and Cite This For Me (formerly...), Cite This For Me (formerly...) is better suited for small businesses based on reviewer sentiment and segment alignment. - **RefWorks:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers note it is more institution-focused and costly for individuals or small teams. - **Cite This For Me (formerly...):** Largest segment is Mid-Market; reviewers highlight its accessibility, ease of use, and free version as advantages for smaller organizations. ### Which Reference Management platform has better integrations? RefWorks is favored for integrations, particularly with academic and writing tools. - **RefWorks:** Reviewers frequently mention integration with Google Scholar and Microsoft Word as key strengths. - **Cite This For Me (formerly...):** Reviewers request improved integration with Microsoft Word and note the absence of direct browser add-ons for citation capture. ### How do RefWorks and Cite This For Me (formerly... compare on customer support? RefWorks has a higher Quality of Support score than Cite This For Me (formerly...), with a 1.1-point advantage indicating a material difference. - **RefWorks:** Reviewers describe support as responsive and helpful, with several citing positive experiences and a score of 8.2. - **Cite This For Me (formerly...):** Reviewers rate support at 7.1, with mixed feedback; some mention slow or limited support, especially for free users. ### Which is easier to implement, RefWorks or Cite This For Me (formerly...? RefWorks and Cite This For Me (formerly...) score within a point of each other on Ease of Setup, with RefWorks at 7.0 and Cite This For Me (formerly...) at 6.0, indicating a slight advantage for RefWorks. - **RefWorks:** Reviewers note that initial setup can be challenging for new users but becomes easier with experience and support materials. - **Cite This For Me (formerly...):** Reviewers describe setup as straightforward, especially for basic citation needs, but mention that advanced features require account creation and can be less intuitive. | | Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) | RefWorks | |---|---|---| | **Star Rating** | 4.6 out of 5 | 3.9 out of 5 | | **Total Reviews** | 22 | 29 | | **Largest Market Segment** | Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews) | Enterprise (55.2% of reviews) | | **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | --- ## Ratings Comparison | Rating | Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) | RefWorks | |---|---|---| | **Meets Requirements** | 9.1 (17 reviews) | 7.9 (26 reviews) | | **Ease of Use** | 8.0 (17 reviews) | 8.1 (27 reviews) | | **Ease of Setup** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Ease of Admin** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Quality of Support** | 7.1 (12 reviews) | 8.2 (15 reviews) | | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 7.1 (16 reviews) | 5.0 (28 reviews) | --- ## Pricing ### Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available ### RefWorks #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available --- ## Categories **Shared Categories (1):** [Reference Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management) --- ## Reviewer Demographics ### By Company Size | Segment | Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) | RefWorks | |---|---|---| | **Small-Business** | 35.0% | 20.7% | | **Mid-Market** | 50.0% | 24.1% | | **Enterprise** | 15.0% | 55.2% | ### By Industry #### Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) - **Writing and Editing:** 40.0% - **Higher Education:** 15.0% - **Research:** 10.0% - **Hospital & Health Care:** 10.0% - **Medical Practice:** 5.0% - **Market Research:** 5.0% - **Legal Services:** 5.0% - **Health, Wellness and Fitness:** 5.0% - **Education Management:** 5.0% #### RefWorks - **Higher Education:** 41.4% - **Research:** 17.2% - **Education Management:** 10.3% - **Publishing:** 3.4% - **Non-Profit Organization Management:** 3.4% - **Libraries:** 3.4% - **Information Technology and Services:** 3.4% - **Human Resources:** 3.4% - **Hospital & Health Care:** 3.4% - **Health, Wellness and Fitness:** 3.4% - **Other:** 6.9% --- ## Alternatives ### Alternatives to Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) - [Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (250 reviews) - [Zotero](https://www.g2.com/products/zotero/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (99 reviews) - [EndNote](https://www.g2.com/products/endnote/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (183 reviews) - [ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/products/readcube/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (174 reviews) - [Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/products/sciwheel/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (48 reviews) - [Citavi](https://www.g2.com/products/citavi/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (18 reviews) - [Logically](https://www.g2.com/products/afforai-logically/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (146 reviews) - [JabRef](https://www.g2.com/products/jabref/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (12 reviews) - [Paperguide](https://www.g2.com/products/paperguide/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (102 reviews) - [Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/products/paperpile/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (26 reviews) ### Alternatives to RefWorks - [Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (250 reviews) - [EndNote](https://www.g2.com/products/endnote/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (183 reviews) - [EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/products/easybib-com/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (152 reviews) - [Zotero](https://www.g2.com/products/zotero/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (99 reviews) - [Citavi](https://www.g2.com/products/citavi/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (18 reviews) - [ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/products/readcube/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (174 reviews) - [Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/products/paperpile/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (26 reviews) - [Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/products/sciwheel/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (48 reviews) - [JabRef](https://www.g2.com/products/jabref/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (12 reviews) - [Logically](https://www.g2.com/products/afforai-logically/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (146 reviews) --- ## Top Discussions ### Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) No discussions available for this product. ### RefWorks No discussions available for this product. --- **Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-refworks)