Compare Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) and ReadCube

At a Glance
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Star Rating
(22)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
ReadCube
ReadCube
Star Rating
(173)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $7.00 Per Month
Browse all 2 pricing plans

Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs ReadCube

  • Reviewers felt that Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) meets the needs of their business better than ReadCube.
  • When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that ReadCube is the preferred option.
  • For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of ReadCube over Cite This For Me (formerly RefME).
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
No pricing available
ReadCube
Papers by ReadCube - Individual Licenses
Starting at $7.00
Per Month
Browse all 2 pricing plans
Free Trial
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
No trial information available
ReadCube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
17
8.4
133
Ease of Use
8.0
17
8.5
141
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.7
56
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.4
6
Quality of Support
7.1
12
8.7
105
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
16
8.4
124
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
ReadCube
ReadCube
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) and ReadCube are categorized as Reference Management
Unique Categories
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) has no unique categories
ReadCube
ReadCube has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
35.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
50.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
15.0%
ReadCube
ReadCube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
53.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
12.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
34.3%
Reviewers' Industry
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Writing and Editing
40.0%
Higher Education
15.0%
Research
10.0%
Hospital & Health Care
10.0%
Medical Practice
5.0%
Other
20.0%
ReadCube
ReadCube
Research
39.3%
Higher Education
20.8%
Biotechnology
7.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
4.2%
Other
23.2%
Alternatives
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) Alternatives
Mendeley
Mendeley
Add Mendeley
Zotero
Zotero
Add Zotero
EndNote
EndNote
Add EndNote
RefWorks
RefWorks
Add RefWorks
ReadCube
ReadCube Alternatives
Mendeley
Mendeley
Add Mendeley
EndNote
EndNote
Add EndNote
EasyBib.com
EasyBib.com
Add EasyBib.com
Zotero
Zotero
Add Zotero
Discussions
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) has no discussions with answers
ReadCube
ReadCube Discussions
How can I see pdf while editing bibliographic data?
2 Comments
Jacob M.
JM
You can use the Preview button in the bottom left of the app to see a preview of the PDF while you are editing metadata fieldsRead more
How do identify articles that are not grouped
2 Comments
Daniel K.
DK
I do a search in my general library.Read more
Does Papers easily replace EndNote for the generation bibliographies, within Word documents?
2 Comments
Alex H.
AH
Yes it does. The SmartCite plugin supports Word & Google Docs and supported 9000+ preset styles. Custom styles can also be used.Read more