Link copied to clipboard

# Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs Mendeley Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme/mendeley/export.csv)

Cite This For Me (formerly...Mendeley[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
No pricing available

**Mendeley**
No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
Not enough reviews yet

**Mendeley**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
Not enough reviews yet

**Mendeley**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
$$$$$

**Mendeley**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
Not enough reviews yet

**Mendeley**
Not enough reviews yet

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
Not enough data

**Mendeley**
Not enough data

Integrations

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
Not enough data

**Mendeley**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_89403f91f420a370f25b6800af702d70/microsoft-word.png "Product Avatar Image")

Microsoft Word

](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-word/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/integrations)

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**

9.1

9.117

**Mendeley**

8.6

8.6223

Ease of Use

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**

8.0

8.017

**Mendeley**

8.7

8.7223

Ease of Setup

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
Not enough data

**Mendeley**

9.2

9.217

Ease of Admin

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
Not enough data

**Mendeley**

9.6

9.69

Quality of Support

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**

7.1

7.112

**Mendeley**

7.9

7.9143

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**
Not enough data

**Mendeley**

8.9

8.96

Product Direction (% positive)

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)**

7.1

7.116

**Mendeley**

8.1

8.1216

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_3fe6ab0ed0e00cbf3d15c29adeb6804e/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme.png "Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)")](https://www.g2.com/products/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme/reviews)

Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

35.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

50.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

15.0%

[![Mendeley](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_5a282d8d948142ab885657207e9c3426/mendeley.png "Mendeley")](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/reviews)

Mendeley

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

30.7%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

20.9%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

48.4%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

35.0%

30.7%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

50.0%

20.9%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

15.0%

48.4%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_3fe6ab0ed0e00cbf3d15c29adeb6804e/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme.png "Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)")](https://www.g2.com/products/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme/reviews)
Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)

Writing and Editing

40.0%

Higher Education

15.0%

Research

10.0%

Hospital & Health Care

10.0%

Medical Practice

5.0%

Other

20.0%

[![Mendeley](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_5a282d8d948142ab885657207e9c3426/mendeley.png "Mendeley")](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/reviews)
Mendeley

Higher Education

42.2%

Research

23.8%

Education Management

7.0%

Hospital & Health Care

2.5%

Mechanical or Industrial Engineering

2.0%

Other

22.5%

FAQs

## Cite This For Me (formerly... vs Mendeley FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between Mendeley vs Cite This For Me (formerly...?

Mendeley and Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) differ most clearly in their reviewer ratings, support scores, and top-cited strengths, with Mendeley excelling in PDF management and Word integration, while Cite This For Me is favored for its citation style coverage and speed.

| [Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/reviews) | [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/products/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.3/5 (250 reviews) | 4.6/5 (22 reviews) |
| — | — |
| 9.2 | — |
| 7.9 | 7.1 |
| Automated PDF metadata extraction, cross-device sync, and Word plug-in for instant bibliography updates | Multiple citation formats (APA, MLA, Harvard), fast citation generation, and ease of use |

### How do the pricing models of Mendeley and Cite This For Me (formerly... compare?

G2 reviewers rate Mendeley and Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) similarly on value, with no Price/Cost dimension score provided for either product.

- **Mendeley:** In recent reviews, many highlight that Mendeley is free to use and offers robust features for academic writing and citation management, though some mention limitations in free storage and occasional sync issues.
- **Cite This For Me (formerly RefME):** Reviewers appreciate the free access to multiple citation styles and the time-saving automation, but note that the pro version is considered costly and the free version is ad-supported.

### What are the best alternatives to Mendeley and Cite This For Me (formerly...?

The top three alternatives to Mendeley and Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) are EndNote, ReadCube, and Zotero.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/reviews) | 4.3/5 (250 reviews) | — | Free tier available, robust features for academic writing | Automated PDF metadata extraction, Word integration |
| [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/products/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme/reviews) | 4.6/5 (22 reviews) | — | Free access with ads, pro version available | Multiple citation formats, fast citation generation |
| [EndNote](https://www.g2.com/products/endnote/reviews) | 4.1/5 (183 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Comprehensive reference management for large organizations |
| [ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/products/readcube/reviews) | 4.4/5 (174 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Modern interface and strong PDF management |
| [Zotero](https://www.g2.com/products/zotero/reviews) | 4.4/5 (99 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Open-source, flexible citation management |

### Which Reference Management features should I prioritize when comparing Mendeley and Cite This For Me (formerly...?

Buyers comparing Mendeley and Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) should prioritize citation style coverage, PDF/document management, integration with word processors, ease of use, and support quality.

- **Citation style coverage:** Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) is frequently praised for supporting a wide range of citation formats including APA, MLA, Harvard, and Chicago; Mendeley also supports multiple styles but is more often cited for its automation.
- **PDF/document management:** Mendeley is highlighted for automated PDF metadata extraction and annotation features, which are not mentioned for Cite This For Me (formerly RefME).
- **Integration with word processors:** Mendeley is repeatedly cited for its Microsoft Word plug-in, enabling instant bibliography updates; Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) reviewers note the lack of direct Word integration as a limitation.
- **Ease of use:** Mendeley scores 8.7 and Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) scores 8.0 on Ease of Use.
- **Support quality:** Mendeley scores 7.9 and Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) scores 7.1 on Quality of Support.

### What are the pros and cons of Mendeley vs Cite This For Me (formerly...?

Mendeley's headline strength is its automated PDF management and Word integration, while Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) is strongest in citation style coverage and speed.

- **Mendeley strengths:** Automated PDF metadata extraction, cross-device sync, robust Word plug-in for instant bibliography updates, and strong folder organization.
- **Mendeley trade-offs:** Limited free storage (2GB), sync issues, occasional crashes, frequent logouts, and slower performance with large libraries.
- **Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) strengths:** Wide range of citation formats (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago), fast citation generation, and ease of use for quick bibliography creation.
- **Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) trade-offs:** Ad-supported free version, costly pro version, lack of direct Word integration, and occasional inaccuracies in auto-generated citations.

### Is Mendeley or Cite This For Me (formerly... better for small businesses?

Mendeley is the better fit for small businesses, as it is frequently used by small-business reviewers and offers features that support collaborative academic work.

- **Mendeley:** Small-business reviewers highlight its ease of use, collaboration features, and free tier as valuable for academic teams and research groups.
- **Cite This For Me (formerly RefME):** While used by small-business reviewers, feedback centers on its speed and citation style coverage, but notes limitations in integration and ad-supported experience.

### Which Reference Management platform has better integrations?

Mendeley is favored for integrations, particularly with Microsoft Word, which is a recurring theme in reviewer feedback.

- **Mendeley:** Microsoft Word integration is cited in 30 all-time reviews, with many reviewers highlighting the convenience of the Word plug-in for citation management.
- **Cite This For Me (formerly RefME):** Reviewers mention the lack of direct integration with Microsoft Word as a limitation, and no other integrations are cited in recent reviews.

### How do Mendeley and Cite This For Me (formerly... compare on customer support?

Mendeley and Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) are rated within 0.8 points on Quality of Support, with Mendeley scoring higher at 7.9 versus 7.1.

- **Mendeley:** Reviewers describe support as responsive and helpful, with a large user community and official resources available.
- **Cite This For Me (formerly RefME):** Support is described as adequate but less responsive, with some reviewers noting slow responses and limited assistance for technical issues.

### Which is easier to implement, Mendeley or Cite This For Me (formerly...?

Mendeley is rated higher on Ease of Setup, scoring 9.2, while no Ease of Setup score is available for Cite This For Me (formerly RefME).

- **Mendeley:** Reviewers consistently describe setup as intuitive and quick, with most able to start using the platform productively within minutes.
- **Cite This For Me (formerly RefME):** Reviewers mention that the platform is easy to use, but do not provide detailed feedback on the setup process.

Alternatives

**Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) Alternatives**

 ![Zotero](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_10f1683f53cc35fb59cf660e80d6be20/zotero.png "Zotero")

[
Zotero
](/products/zotero/reviews)

 ![EndNote](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_79d1e55423c4e496e5de32d1d55e2efb/endnote.png "EndNote")

[
EndNote
](/products/endnote/reviews)

 ![RefWorks](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_e39812b59d9f0c9d5a53b9777df49d64/refworks.png "RefWorks")

[
RefWorks
](/products/refworks/reviews)

 ![ReadCube](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/04acb9eb76dc91a3c8f563d1594800e4/readcube.svg "ReadCube")

[
ReadCube
](/products/readcube/reviews)

**Mendeley Alternatives**

 ![EndNote](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_79d1e55423c4e496e5de32d1d55e2efb/endnote.png "EndNote")

[
EndNote
](/products/endnote/reviews)

 ![ReadCube](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/04acb9eb76dc91a3c8f563d1594800e4/readcube.svg "ReadCube")

[
ReadCube
](/products/readcube/reviews)

 ![EasyBib.com](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_9ef7ead04618db7671a8a6b8650bbf4d/easybib-com.png "EasyBib.com")

[
EasyBib.com
](/products/easybib-com/reviews)

 ![Zotero](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_10f1683f53cc35fb59cf660e80d6be20/zotero.png "Zotero")

[
Zotero
](/products/zotero/reviews)

## Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs Mendeley

- Reviewers felt that Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) meets the needs of their business better than Mendeley.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Mendeley is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Mendeley over Cite This For Me (formerly RefME).