Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cisco Secure Endpoints and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intezer
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (38.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cisco Secure Endpoints
Star Rating
(21)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cisco Secure EndpointsMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Star Rating
(305)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Defender for EndpointSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Cisco Secure Endpoints excels in Device Control with a score of 9.0, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint trails slightly at 8.5. Reviewers mention that Cisco's robust device management features allow for more granular control over endpoint devices.
- Reviewers mention that Cisco Secure Endpoints offers superior Web Control capabilities, scoring 9.1 compared to Microsoft Defender's 8.1. Users say that Cisco's web filtering options are more comprehensive, providing better protection against malicious sites.
- G2 users highlight the effectiveness of Cisco's Malware Detection with a score of 9.3, which outperforms Microsoft Defender's 8.7. Users report that Cisco's detection algorithms are more proactive, catching threats before they can cause damage.
- Users on G2 appreciate Cisco Secure Endpoints for its Automated Remediation features, scoring 8.3, which some reviewers say helps in quickly resolving security incidents without manual intervention, a feature that Microsoft Defender lacks in comparison.
- Reviewers mention that Cisco's Security Validation scored 9.4, indicating a strong capability in verifying the effectiveness of security measures, while Microsoft Defender's score of 8.5 suggests it may not be as thorough in this area.
- Users say that Cisco Secure Endpoints provides a better overall Quality of Support with a score of 9.3, compared to Microsoft Defender's 8.5. Reviewers report that Cisco's support team is more responsive and knowledgeable, enhancing the user experience significantly.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoints
No pricing availableMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cisco Secure Endpoints
No trial information availableMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.2
19
8.6
246
Ease of Use
9.2
19
8.6
251
Ease of Setup
9.3
9
8.6
161
Ease of Admin
8.9
9
8.6
154
Quality of Support
9.3
17
8.5
236
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
9
8.6
150
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
18
9.2
245
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
8.5
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.7
20
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.4
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Generative AI
Not enough data
8.0
52
Not enough data
8.0
52
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Services - Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR)
Not enough data
Not enough data
System Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Vulnerability Prevention
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cisco Secure Endpoints and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are categorized as Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR), Antivirus, and Endpoint Protection Platforms
Unique Categories
Cisco Secure Endpoints is categorized as Endpoint Management
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cisco Secure Endpoints
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Marketing and Advertising
9.5%
Hospital & Health Care
9.5%
Financial Services
9.5%
Other
42.9%
Information Technology and Services
25.5%
Computer & Network Security
14.3%
Computer Software
6.1%
Financial Services
5.8%
Telecommunications
2.4%
Other
45.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Cisco Secure Endpoints has no discussions with answers
when scheduled scan starts it consume 100% CPU, can you kindly provide solution for it.
1 Comment
PQ
Method I: Ensure that no other Adware, Antimalware or Antivirus software is installed or not fully removed
Method II: Prevent Windows Defender from scanning...Read more
can i use this for my video games?
1 Comment
PQ
if you are using Xbox, then all software's are certified by Microsoft, so no need the virus scan Read more
Which feature in Microsoft Defender for endpoint?
1 Comment
NM
Comprehensive protection: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides protection against a wide range of threats, including viruses, malware, ransomware, and...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
