Link copied to clipboard

# Cisco Catalyst Center vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/cisco-cisco-catalyst-center/palo-alto-networks-panorama/export.csv)

Cisco DNA CenterPalo Alto Networks Panorama[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**Cisco Catalyst Center**

**$128.00** Per Feature Per Month · Basic

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**
No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Perceived Cost

**Cisco Catalyst Center**
$$$$$

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Cisco Catalyst Center**
Not enough reviews yet

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**
15%

Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience.
See it for free

Time to Implement

**Cisco Catalyst Center** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

Return on Investment

**Cisco Catalyst Center** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**Cisco Catalyst Center**

Ease of Use (2)

Productivity Improvement (2)

Compatibility Issues (1)

Complex Implementation (1)

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**

Centralized Management (2)

Features (2)

Complex Setup (1)

Difficult Learning Curve (1)

Integrations

**Cisco Catalyst Center**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_012b76ab301bdc170e19cf58ce3d11df/zscaler-generative-ai-security.jpeg "Product Avatar Image")

Zscaler Generative AI Security

](https://www.g2.com/products/zscaler-generative-ai-security/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-cisco-catalyst-center/integrations)

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_71b3279994498356444c5ab8c8cb23ae/meta-audience-network.png "Product Avatar Image")

Meta Audience Network

](https://www.g2.com/products/meta-audience-network/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_03bf54b4db6561d1ef5bcec7ccf6fffb/wildfire.png "Product Avatar Image")

Wildfire

](https://www.g2.com/products/wildfire/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/palo-alto-networks-panorama/integrations)

Screenshots

**Cisco Catalyst Center**
 ![Cisco Catalyst Center screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/107471/Screen-Shot-2019-05-30-at-3.01.52-PM.png)

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**
No screenshot available

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**Cisco Catalyst Center**

**8.6** /10

Based on 37 responses

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**

**9.0** /10

Based on 33 responses

Ease of Use

**Cisco Catalyst Center**

**8.5** /10

Based on 24 responses

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**

**8.7** /10

Based on 33 responses

Ease of Setup

**Cisco Catalyst Center**

**8.3** /10

Based on 18 responses

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**

**8.2** /10

Based on 31 responses

Ease of Admin

**Cisco Catalyst Center**

**8.2** /10

Based on 16 responses

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**

**8.9** /10

Based on 28 responses

Quality of Support

**Cisco Catalyst Center**

**8.9** /10

Based on 27 responses

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**

**8.5** /10

Based on 33 responses

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Cisco Catalyst Center**

**8.8** /10

Based on 20 responses

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**

**8.8** /10

Based on 28 responses

Product Direction (% positive)

**Cisco Catalyst Center**

**9.4** /10

Based on 36 responses

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama**

**10.0** /10

Based on 32 responses

**Features**
ratings from reviews

Network Security Policy Management (NSPM)

**8.6** /10

Based on 8 responses

**9.0** /10

Based on 25 responses

Zero Trust Networking

Not enough data

**9.0** /10

Based on 9 responses

Network Management Tools

**8.6** /10

Based on 7 responses

Not enough data

User Insights

**Reviewers' Company Size**

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
19.4%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
48.4%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
19.4%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
48.4%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
5.1%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
48.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
46.2%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
5.1%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
48.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
46.2%

**Reviewers' Industry**

[![Cisco Catalyst Center](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/93b1b2b88a0000d371b4f969f353c896/cisco-cisco-catalyst-center.png "Cisco Catalyst Center")](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-cisco-catalyst-center/reviews)
Cisco Catalyst Center

Computer & Network Security
14.9%

Hospital & Health Care
14.9%

Telecommunications
12.8%

Information Technology and Services
6.4%

Higher Education
6.4%

Other
44.7%

[![Palo Alto Networks Panorama](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/ebdad1b3b32aae1ae3e92d7c850a6be1/palo-alto-networks-panorama.svg "Palo Alto Networks Panorama")](https://www.g2.com/products/palo-alto-networks-panorama/reviews)
Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Information Technology and Services
28.2%

Computer & Network Security
17.9%

Oil & Energy
5.1%

Medical Devices
5.1%

Internet
5.1%

Other
38.5%

Alternatives

**Cisco Catalyst Center Alternatives**

 ![Progress WhatsUp Gold](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/6bb9084083b71cf2b4cc4ad7c2be392b/progress-whatsup-gold.svg "Progress WhatsUp Gold")

[
Progress WhatsUp Gold
](/products/progress-whatsup-gold/reviews)

 ![Auvik](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/05e67363e9264c32e4022d98bbf4e2c3/auvik-networks.svg "Auvik")

[
Auvik
](/products/auvik-networks/reviews)

 ![HPE Aruba Networking Management](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_3a3011d148181c9769d5f17b48322103/hpe-aruba-networking-management.png "HPE Aruba Networking Management")

[
HPE Aruba Networking...
](/products/hpe-aruba-networking-management/reviews)

 ![SolarWinds Observability](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/af917f02e5d5dda08cf58d16d36f6a8d/solarwinds-worldwide-llc-solarwinds-observability.svg "SolarWinds Observability")

[
SolarWinds Observability
](/products/solarwinds-worldwide-llc-solarwinds-observability/reviews)

**Palo Alto Networks Panorama Alternatives**

 ![Okta](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/fc3b8f792177eb1565971fd0bb450896/okta.svg "Okta")

[
Okta
](/products/okta/reviews)

 ![AlgoSec Horizon](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_45a75f85a8be38a11dd6bc3d85904968/algosec-horizon.png "AlgoSec Horizon")

[
AlgoSec Horizon
](/products/algosec-horizon/reviews)

 ![Cisco Duo](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/0c4cbb48b5fd0e4e0c50c0a558e4898e/cisco-duo.svg "Cisco Duo")

[
Cisco Duo
](/products/cisco-duo/reviews)

 ![Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFWs)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/64ff8da1b6e6ffabf4336ae2510e8e3e/check-point-next-generation-firewalls-ngfws.svg "Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFWs)")

[
Check Point Next Generation...
](/products/check-point-next-generation-firewalls-ngfws/reviews)

## Cisco DNA Center vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 15, 2026

### What is the difference between Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Cisco DNA Center?

Palo Alto Networks Panorama stands out for centralized management of Palo Alto firewalls, while Cisco DNA Center is favored for automation and integration within Cisco environments.

| [Palo Alto Networks Panorama](https://www.g2.com/products/palo-alto-networks-panorama/reviews) | [Cisco DNA Center](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-cisco-dna-center/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| G2 Rating (reviews): 4.5/5 (48 reviews) | G2 Rating (reviews): 4.3/5 (53 reviews) |
| Ease of Setup: 8.3 | Ease of Setup: 8.3 |
| Quality of Support: 8.5 | Quality of Support: 8.9 |
| Top Reviewer-Cited Strength: Centralized Management (2 all-time mentions) | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength: Automation (1 all-time mention) |

### How do the pricing models of Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco DNA Center compare?

Reviewers rate Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco DNA Center at parity for value, with both products showing similar satisfaction on price and cost-related dimensions.

- **Palo Alto Networks Panorama:** In recent reviews, several reviewers note that licensing costs are high, but the return on investment is justified for multi-firewall environments due to operational efficiencies.
- **Cisco DNA Center:** Recent reviewers describe the platform as powerful but note that it can be expensive, especially for businesses with budget constraints, and that licensing complexity is a consideration.

### What are the best alternatives to Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco DNA Center?

The top three alternatives to Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco DNA Center are Progress WhatsUp Gold, Okta, and Auvik.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Palo Alto Networks Panorama](https://www.g2.com/products/palo-alto-networks-panorama/reviews) | 4.5/5 (48 reviews) | — | Licensing is costly but justified by operational efficiency | Centralized Management |
| [Cisco DNA Center](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-cisco-dna-center/reviews) | 4.3/5 (53 reviews) | — | Powerful but can be expensive and complex to license | Automation |
| [Progress WhatsUp Gold](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-whatsup-gold/reviews) | 4.4/5 (390 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Network Monitoring |
| [Okta](https://www.g2.com/products/okta/reviews) | 4.5/5 (1373 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Identity Management |
| [Auvik](https://www.g2.com/products/auvik-networks/reviews) | 4.5/5 (380 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Network Visibility |

### Which Network Security Policy Management (NSPM) features should I prioritize when comparing Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco DNA Center?

Buyers should prioritize centralized management, automation, ease of use, integration capabilities, and policy consistency when comparing Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco DNA Center.

- **Centralized Management:** Palo Alto Networks Panorama: 2 all-time mentions; Cisco DNA Center: 1 all-time mention (as management ease).
- **Automation:** Cisco DNA Center: 1 all-time mention; Palo Alto Networks Panorama: not cited for automation in recent reviews.
- **Ease of Use:** Palo Alto Networks Panorama: 8.7; Cisco DNA Center: 8.5.
- **Integration Capabilities:** Cisco DNA Center: 1 all-time mention for easy integrations; Palo Alto Networks Panorama: Wildfire integration cited in recent reviews.
- **Policy Consistency:** Palo Alto Networks Panorama: multiple recent reviews highlight policy consistency and enforcement across devices.

### What are the pros and cons of Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Cisco DNA Center?

Palo Alto Networks Panorama is strongest for centralized firewall management, while Cisco DNA Center excels in automation and integration within Cisco environments.

- **Palo Alto Networks Panorama strengths:** Centralized Management (2 all-time mentions), Features (2), Ease of Use (1), Security (1), User Interface (1).
- **Palo Alto Networks Panorama trade-offs:** Complex Setup (1), Difficult Learning Curve (1), Expensive (1), Poor Customer Support (1).
- **Cisco DNA Center strengths:** Ease of Use (2), Productivity Improvement (2), Automation (1), Easy Integrations (1), Efficiency (1), Management Ease (1), Monitoring (1), Network Connectivity (1), Network Management (1).
- **Cisco DNA Center trade-offs:** Compatibility Issues (1), Complex Implementation (1), Complex Interface (1), Complexity (1), High Licensing Costs (1), Interface Issues (1), Learning Curve (1), Licensing Issues (1), Limited Compatibility (1), Limited Customization (1).

### Is Palo Alto Networks Panorama or Cisco DNA Center better for small businesses?

Auvik is the better fit for small businesses, as indicated by its largest segment and reviewer sentiment, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco DNA Center are more commonly used in mid-market and enterprise environments.

- **Palo Alto Networks Panorama:** Largest reviewer segment is Mid-Market; reviewers highlight centralized management and operational efficiency for larger environments.
- **Cisco DNA Center:** Largest reviewer segment is Mid-Market; reviewers note its power and automation but also mention complexity and cost as considerations for smaller organizations.

### Which Network Security Policy Management (NSPM) platform has better integrations?

Cisco DNA Center is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing easy integrations and automation capabilities.

- **Palo Alto Networks Panorama:** Wildfire integration is cited in recent reviews, with 2 all-time mentions.
- **Cisco DNA Center:** Easy integrations are cited in recent reviews, with 1 all-time mention for integrations and 1 for easy integrations.

### How do Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco DNA Center compare on customer support?

Cisco DNA Center scores higher on Quality of Support, with a 0.4-point advantage over Palo Alto Networks Panorama (8.9 vs 8.5).

- **Palo Alto Networks Panorama:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive and technically strong, though some mention delayed responses and occasional difficulty connecting with support.
- **Cisco DNA Center:** Reviewers consistently highlight strong support experiences, with several noting helpful and knowledgeable support teams and positive interactions with Cisco TAC.

### Which is easier to implement, Palo Alto Networks Panorama or Cisco DNA Center?

Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco DNA Center are rated at parity for Ease of Setup, both scoring 8.3, with reviewers noting a learning curve for both platforms.

- **Palo Alto Networks Panorama:** Reviewers frequently mention a steep learning curve and the need for training during initial setup, but also note that onboarding resources and documentation are comprehensive.
- **Cisco DNA Center:** Reviewers describe the setup as straightforward for experienced engineers, but note that the platform's complexity and architecture can make implementation challenging for new users.

## Cisco Catalyst Center vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Palo Alto Networks Panorama easier to use and administer. However, Cisco Catalyst Center is easier to set up. Reviewers agreed that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall.

- Reviewers felt that Palo Alto Networks Panorama meets the needs of their business better than Cisco Catalyst Center.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Cisco Catalyst Center is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Palo Alto Networks Panorama over Cisco Catalyst Center.