When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN easier to use, set up, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of administration with Versa SASE.
Reviewers felt that Versa SASE meets the needs of their business better than Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Versa SASE over Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
No pricing available
Versa SASE
No pricing available
Free Trial
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
No trial information available
Versa SASE
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
56
9.5
10
Ease of Use
9.1
58
8.8
10
Ease of Setup
9.2
44
8.6
7
Ease of Admin
8.9
42
9.3
7
Quality of Support
8.9
55
8.7
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Cisco SDWAN is used for Software Defined Networking
Centralized management
Zero Touch provisioning
Link agnostic
Load Balancing and sharing...Read more
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.