- Home
- ...
- Continuous Integration Tools
- CircleCI
- Application Release Automation
- CircleCI-vs-Application Release Automation
Compare CircleCI and IBM UrbanCode Deploy 
CircleCI vs IBM UrbanCode Deploy
- Users report that CircleCI excels in "Continuous Deployment" with a score of 9.0, highlighting its ability to automate deployment processes seamlessly, which is crucial for teams looking to streamline their workflows.
- Reviewers mention that CircleCI's "Pipeline Control" feature, rated at 8.8, provides excellent visibility and management of deployment pipelines, making it easier for developers to track progress and troubleshoot issues.
- G2 users indicate that IBM UrbanCode Deploy shines in "Configuration Management" with a score of 8.8, allowing for robust management of application configurations across various environments, which is particularly beneficial for enterprise-level deployments.
- Users on G2 report that IBM UrbanCode Deploy's "Processes and Workflow" functionality, rated at 8.4, offers strong orchestration capabilities, enabling teams to define and manage complex deployment workflows effectively.
- Reviewers say that CircleCI's "Automation" feature, rated at 8.9, is highly praised for its ability to automate testing and deployment processes, which significantly reduces manual intervention and speeds up release cycles.
- Users mention that while both products have strong integration capabilities, CircleCI's "Integrations" score of 8.9 is noted for its extensive support for various third-party tools, making it a preferred choice for teams using diverse tech stacks.
- Up to 6,000 build minutes per month
- Largest selection: Build for Docker, Windows, Linux, Arm, and macOS or on your own compute with self-hosted runners
- Build better: Choose the right resource class size (S–L) to go fast and maximize your build minutes
Things that I like arranged sorted by usefulness - 1. * Debug via SSH * - This is pretty much the best feature it has, where you can actively debug your builds when there is a error instead of just failing. As the tests are run on their containers, it...
Occasional connectivity issues, nonsense 137 OOM and infrastructure failure which result in build failures with no part on our end. That costs us credits. 137 OOM error happens from time to time to our Node.JS application when their dashboard resources show...
The flexibility it offers us in automaring our deployment processes
Agent management. We have several thousahd agents and maintainance of thiose agents(install, java upgrades, and overall health) is sometimes overwhelming.
Things that I like arranged sorted by usefulness - 1. * Debug via SSH * - This is pretty much the best feature it has, where you can actively debug your builds when there is a error instead of just failing. As the tests are run on their containers, it...
The flexibility it offers us in automaring our deployment processes
Occasional connectivity issues, nonsense 137 OOM and infrastructure failure which result in build failures with no part on our end. That costs us credits. 137 OOM error happens from time to time to our Node.JS application when their dashboard resources show...
Agent management. We have several thousahd agents and maintainance of thiose agents(install, java upgrades, and overall health) is sometimes overwhelming.
