Users report that Tungsten Capture excels in ease of use with a score of 9.0, while ChronoScan has a lower score of 7.8, indicating that Tungsten Capture may be more user-friendly for everyday tasks.
Reviewers mention that Tungsten Capture has a higher score for meeting requirements at 8.9 compared to ChronoScan's 8.5, suggesting that Tungsten Capture may better align with user needs and expectations.
G2 users highlight that Tungsten Capture's quality of support is rated at 7.7, which is slightly lower than ChronoScan's 8.0, indicating that users may find ChronoScan's support more responsive and helpful.
Users on G2 report that Tungsten Capture shines in document management with a score of 8.0, while ChronoScan also scores 8.0, but users mention that Tungsten Capture's integration capabilities are particularly robust, making it easier to connect with other tools.
Reviewers mention that Tungsten Capture has a better score for upload functionality at 8.3, while ChronoScan's score is not specified, suggesting that Tungsten Capture may offer a more seamless experience for uploading documents.
Users say that Tungsten Capture's product direction is rated at 7.5, which is higher than ChronoScan's 6.5, indicating that users may feel more confident in Tungsten Capture's future development and enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ChronoScan
No pricing available
Tungsten Capture
No pricing available
Free Trial
ChronoScan
No trial information available
Tungsten Capture
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
10
8.9
19
Ease of Use
7.8
10
9.0
19
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.3
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.1
7
Quality of Support
8.0
9
7.7
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.