# CherryPy vs web2py Comparison

| | CherryPy | web2py | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 3.0 out of 5 | 4.1 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 12 | 12 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Small-Business (54.5% of reviews) | Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | 


---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | CherryPy | web2py | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.0 (9 reviews) | 8.9 (11 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 7.8 (9 reviews) | 8.5 (11 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 6.5 (8 reviews) | 8.2 (11 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 3.5 (9 reviews) | 6.8 (11 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### CherryPy

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available

### web2py

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available


---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (1):** [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)




---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | CherryPy | web2py | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 54.5% | 41.7% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 27.3% | 50.0% | 
| **Enterprise** | 18.2% | 8.3% | 

### By Industry

#### CherryPy

- **Publishing:** 9.1%
- **Program Development:** 9.1%
- **Oil & Energy:** 9.1%
- **Market Research:** 9.1%
- **Internet:** 9.1%
- **Higher Education:** 9.1%
- **Furniture:** 9.1%
- **E-Learning:** 9.1%
- **Education Management:** 9.1%
- **Computer Software:** 9.1%
- **Other:** 9.1%

#### web2py

- **Computer Software:** 50.0%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 25.0%
- **Legal Services:** 8.3%
- **Higher Education:** 8.3%
- **Financial Services:** 8.3%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to CherryPy

- [Django](https://www.g2.com/products/django/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (174 reviews)
- [Tornado](https://www.g2.com/products/tornado/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews)
- [Bottle](https://www.g2.com/products/bottle/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/products/pyramid/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [TurboGears](https://www.g2.com/products/turbogears/reviews) — 3.6/5 stars (11 reviews)
- [Kivy](https://www.g2.com/products/kivy/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (21 reviews)
- [CubicWeb](https://www.g2.com/products/cubicweb/reviews) — 3.4/5 stars (5 reviews)
- [jam.py](https://www.g2.com/products/jam-py/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (12 reviews)
- [ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/products/arcgis-api-for-python/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (15 reviews)
- [Riverbed SteelScript](https://www.g2.com/products/riverbed-steelscript/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (5 reviews)

### Alternatives to web2py

- [Django](https://www.g2.com/products/django/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (174 reviews)
- [Flask](https://www.g2.com/products/flask/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (49 reviews)
- [Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/products/pyramid/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [Bottle](https://www.g2.com/products/bottle/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (13 reviews)
- [TurboGears](https://www.g2.com/products/turbogears/reviews) — 3.6/5 stars (11 reviews)
- [Tornado](https://www.g2.com/products/tornado/reviews) — 3.8/5 stars (20 reviews)
- [jam.py](https://www.g2.com/products/jam-py/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (12 reviews)
- [Kivy](https://www.g2.com/products/kivy/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (21 reviews)
- [CubicWeb](https://www.g2.com/products/cubicweb/reviews) — 3.4/5 stars (5 reviews)
- [ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/products/arcgis-api-for-python/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (15 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### CherryPy

No discussions available for this product.

### web2py

No discussions available for this product.

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-web2py)