Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CherryPy and Flask 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
CherryPy
Star Rating
(12)3.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CherryPyFlask
Star Rating
(47)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FlaskSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that CherryPy has a steeper learning curve compared to Flask, with a G2 rating of 7.8 for ease of use, while Flask shines with a rating of 9.3, making it more accessible for beginners.
- Reviewers mention that CherryPy's support quality is lacking, with a G2 rating of 6.5, whereas Flask users appreciate the higher quality of support, reflected in its rating of 8.1, indicating a more responsive and helpful support team.
- G2 users highlight that CherryPy's product direction is perceived as less favorable, with a rating of 3.5, suggesting concerns about future updates and features, while Flask enjoys a more positive outlook with a rating of 7.9, indicating a commitment to ongoing development.
- Users on G2 report that CherryPy's setup process can be cumbersome, lacking the streamlined experience that Flask offers, which has a setup ease rating of 8.8, making it quicker to get started with projects.
- Reviewers say that CherryPy is particularly suited for small business applications, but Flask is noted for its versatility and broader appeal across various market segments, as indicated by its higher percentage of small-business reviews at 57.8% compared to CherryPy's 54.5%.
- Users say that while CherryPy has a solid foundation for web applications, Flask's flexibility and extensive community support make it a preferred choice for developers looking for a more dynamic framework to build upon.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CherryPy
No pricing availableFlask
No pricing availableFree Trial
CherryPy
No trial information availableFlask
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.0
9
9.0
42
Ease of Use
7.8
9
9.3
42
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.9
16
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.7
15
Quality of Support
6.5
8
8.1
36
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.7
9
Product Direction (% positive)
3.5
9
8.0
41
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CherryPy and Flask are categorized as Python Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
CherryPy has no unique categories
Flask has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CherryPy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Flask
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Publishing
9.1%
Program Development
9.1%
Oil & Energy
9.1%
Market Research
9.1%
Internet
9.1%
Other
54.5%
Computer Software
31.9%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
8.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.3%
Telecommunications
2.1%
Other
29.8%
Discussions
CherryPy has no discussions with answers
Is Flask reliable for building realtime chat applications?
1 Comment
VG
Yes, it is. You can build realtime chats with flask and Websocket.Read more
Flask has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
