Link copied to clipboard # Checkmarx vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/checkmarx/opentext-static-application-security-testing/export.csv) CheckmarxOpenText Static Application...[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Checkmarx** Free Trial **Contact Us** · SAST **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **Checkmarx** $$$$$ **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** $$$$$ Average Discount **Checkmarx** Not enough reviews yet **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** Not enough reviews yet Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **Checkmarx** 6 months Based on 100 responses **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** 6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **Checkmarx** 6 months Based on 100 responses **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Checkmarx** Implementation Ease (2) User Interface (2) False Positives (1) Lacking Features (1) **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** Easy Integrations (1) Integrations (1) False Positives (1) Integrations **Checkmarx** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_b3390b4cc3d92e87d570895f7358c003/aws-lambda.jpg "Product Avatar Image") AWS Lambda ](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-lambda/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_2ac0e7b10e1efb64107026cb2b241d53/azure-pipelines.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Azure Pipelines ](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-pipelines/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_816e7e27d5ac09363053c4ca43e63c5c/jenkins.png "Product Avatar Image") Jenkins ](https://www.g2.com/products/jenkins/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_30c8c0be4019fecb52bbd21b32b79b69/teamcity.png "Product Avatar Image") TeamCity ](https://www.g2.com/products/teamcity/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/checkmarx/integrations) **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** Not enough data Screenshots **Checkmarx** ![Checkmarx screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1898040/Checkmarx_One_Platform.png) **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** No screenshot available **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Checkmarx** **8.6** /10 Based on 37 responses **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** **8.3** /10 Based on 15 responses Ease of Use **Checkmarx** **8.5** /10 Based on 37 responses **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** **8.7** /10 Based on 15 responses Ease of Setup **Checkmarx** **8.2** /10 Based on 23 responses **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** **8.3** /10 Based on 9 responses Ease of Admin **Checkmarx** **8.3** /10 Based on 17 responses **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** **8.1** /10 Based on 9 responses Quality of Support **Checkmarx** **8.4** /10 Based on 31 responses **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** **8.7** /10 Based on 15 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Checkmarx** **8.6** /10 Based on 16 responses **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** **8.5** /10 Based on 9 responses Product Direction (% positive) **Checkmarx** **8.2** /10 Based on 32 responses **OpenText Static Application Security Testing** **9.1** /10 Based on 13 responses **Features** ratings from reviews Static Application Security Testing (SAST) **8.5** /10 Based on 15 responses **8.1** /10 Based on 13 responses User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 23.9% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.9% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 52.2% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 23.9% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.9% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 52.2% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 28.6% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 47.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 28.6% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 47.6% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Checkmarx](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/ee46b61b130757d24b7633fe98e00fb6/checkmarx.svg "Checkmarx")](https://www.g2.com/products/checkmarx/reviews) Checkmarx Information Technology and Services 19.0% Computer Software 16.7% Banking 11.9% Computer & Network Security 11.9% Automotive 4.8% Other 35.7% [![OpenText Static Application Security Testing](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2b4f4de47adee5040ae421fc276784e9/opentext-static-application-security-testing.svg "OpenText Static Application Security Testing")](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews) OpenText Static Application Security Testing Financial Services 23.8% Banking 19.0% Information Technology and Services 14.3% Computer Software 14.3% Computer & Network Security 9.5% Other 19.0% Alternatives **Checkmarx Alternatives** ![Veracode Application Security Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d30c215643c0b745ba4951ab20b60121/veracode-application-security-platform.svg "Veracode Application Security Platform") [ Veracode Application... ](/products/veracode-application-security-platform/reviews) ![SonarQube](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2d6b80be24e9f51c144f780f2aa41cb3/sonarqube.svg "SonarQube") [ SonarQube ](/products/sonarqube/reviews) ![Black Duck Polaris Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/195ba70518e2390f639f5372bea2e6c0/black-duck-polaris-platform.svg "Black Duck Polaris Platform") [ Black Duck Polaris Platform ](/products/black-duck-polaris-platform/reviews) ![GitLab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2397ccd7309ef2bca71e3a275d59a5a3/gitlab.svg "GitLab") [ GitLab ](/products/gitlab/reviews) **OpenText Static Application Security Testing Alternatives** ![SonarQube](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2d6b80be24e9f51c144f780f2aa41cb3/sonarqube.svg "SonarQube") [ SonarQube ](/products/sonarqube/reviews) ![GitHub](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8ec3c17e3fb1df25b6a8bd7cc69cf2d1/github.png "GitHub") [ GitHub ](/products/github/reviews) ![Semgrep](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1e7a6e6a67aa276a2da4cfd90e817e9f/semgrep.svg "Semgrep") [ Semgrep ](/products/semgrep/reviews) ![Mend.io](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/21ab57a73c55fc03865e0381fe1de98a/mend-io.svg "Mend.io") [ Mend.io ](/products/mend-io/reviews) ## Checkmarx vs OpenText Static Application... FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 14, 2026 ### What is the difference between Checkmarx vs OpenText Static Application...? OpenText Static Application... stands out for its higher G2 rating and support scores, while Checkmarx is noted for its implementation ease and automation capabilities. | [Checkmarx](https://www.g2.com/products/checkmarx/reviews) | [OpenText Static Application...](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.2/5 (48 reviews) | 4.5/5 (24 reviews) | | 8.1 | 8.3 | | 8.3 | 8.7 | | Implementation Ease | Easy Integrations | ### How do the pricing models of Checkmarx and OpenText Static Application... compare? OpenText Static Application... is rated higher for price satisfaction, indicating reviewers consider it the stronger value. - **Checkmarx:** In recent reviews, several reviewers cite high cost as a concern, especially for startups and small organizations. - **OpenText Static Application...:** Reviewers note the price is high but generally feel the value aligns with its capabilities. - **Switching reasons:** Reviewers mention switching away from Checkmarx due to cost concerns and lack of a free edition. ### What are the best alternatives to Checkmarx and OpenText Static Application...? The top 3 alternatives to Checkmarx and OpenText Static Application... are SonarQube, Veracode Application..., and Black Duck Coverity Static. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Checkmarx](https://www.g2.com/products/checkmarx/reviews) | 4.2/5 (48 reviews) | — | High cost cited as a concern | Implementation Ease | | [OpenText Static Application...](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-static-application-security-testing/reviews) | 4.5/5 (24 reviews) | — | Price is high but value aligns with capabilities | Easy Integrations | | [SonarQube](https://www.g2.com/products/sonarqube/reviews) | 4.4/5 (155 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Comprehensive code quality analysis | | [Veracode Application...](https://www.g2.com/products/veracode-application-security-platform/reviews) | 3.8/5 (26 reviews) | — | — | Cloud-based security testing | | [Black Duck Coverity Static](https://www.g2.com/products/black-duck-coverity-static/reviews) | 4.3/5 (65 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Strong vulnerability detection | ### Which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) features should I prioritize when comparing Checkmarx and OpenText Static Application...? Buyers should prioritize integration capabilities, scan accuracy, ease of setup, false positive management, and reporting features when comparing Checkmarx and OpenText Static Application.... - **Integration capabilities:** Checkmarx (Easy Integrations, 1 all-time mention); OpenText Static Application... (Easy Integrations, 1 all-time mention) - **Scan accuracy:** Checkmarx (Accuracy of Results, 1 all-time mention); OpenText Static Application... (Critical issue detection cited in recent reviews) - **Ease of setup:** Checkmarx (Ease of Setup score: 8.1); OpenText Static Application... (Ease of Setup score: 8.3) - **False positive management:** Both products have recent reviewer concerns about false positives (1 all-time mention each) - **Reporting features:** Checkmarx (Dashboard Usability, 1 all-time mention); OpenText Static Application... (Organized Dashboard cited in recent reviews) ### What are the pros and cons of Checkmarx vs OpenText Static Application...? Checkmarx is strongest for implementation ease and automation, while OpenText Static Application... is favored for integrations and support. - **Checkmarx strengths:** Implementation Ease (2 all-time mentions), Automation Testing (1), User Interface (2), Dashboard Usability (1), Easy Integrations (1), Vulnerability Detection (1) - **Checkmarx trade-offs:** False Positives (1), High cost cited in recent reviews, Steep learning curve, Scan duration for large codebases - **OpenText Static Application... strengths:** Easy Integrations (1), Integration Support (1), Wide language support, Organized Dashboard, Real-time scanning, Strong support experience - **OpenText Static Application... trade-offs:** False Positives (1), High price, Initial setup complexity, Scan speed on large projects ### Is Checkmarx or OpenText Static Application... better for small businesses? OpenText Static Application... is the better fit for small businesses, supported by higher ease-of-setup and support scores. - **Checkmarx:** Largest segment not specified; reviewers in startups and small organizations cite high cost as a barrier. - **OpenText Static Application...:** Largest segment not specified; reviewers highlight ease of use and value for small teams despite higher price. ### Which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) platform has better integrations? OpenText Static Application... is favored for integrations, with reviewers highlighting broad integration support. - **Checkmarx:** Jenkins and GitHub integrations mentioned in recent reviews; Jenkins (2 all-time mentions), GitHub (1 all-time mention) - **OpenText Static Application...:** Integrations with IntelliJ, Visual Studio, Android Studio, and CI/CD pipelines cited in recent reviews; Easy Integrations (1 all-time mention) ### How do Checkmarx and OpenText Static Application... compare on customer support? OpenText Static Application... leads on Quality of Support with a 0.4-point advantage over Checkmarx (8.7 vs 8.3). - **Checkmarx:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive, though some note delays and room for improvement. - **OpenText Static Application...:** Reviewers consistently praise support quality, training, and onboarding assistance. ### Which is easier to implement, Checkmarx or OpenText Static Application...? OpenText Static Application... and Checkmarx score within 0.2 points on Ease of Setup (8.3 vs 8.1), indicating near parity. - **Checkmarx:** Reviewers note a learning curve and initial setup complexity, but also mention straightforward integration with CI/CD pipelines. - **OpenText Static Application...:** Reviewers highlight ease of deployment, though some mention initial setup can be complex for large projects. ## Checkmarx vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found OpenText Static Application Security Testing easier to use and set up. However, Checkmarx is easier to administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Checkmarx overall. - Reviewers felt that Checkmarx meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Static Application Security Testing. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that OpenText Static Application Security Testing is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of OpenText Static Application Security Testing over Checkmarx.