Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Checkmarx and GuardRails 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (51.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$0.00 2 Seat Per Month
Checkmarx
Star Rating
(36)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CheckmarxGuardRails
Star Rating
(29)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 2 Seat Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Checkmarx excels in its Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, providing thorough detection of vulnerabilities, while GuardRails offers a slightly higher score of 9.3, indicating a more robust analysis capability that users appreciate for its accuracy.
- Reviewers mention that GuardRails shines in Continuous Assessment with a perfect score of 9.7, which users find invaluable for maintaining security throughout the development lifecycle, whereas Checkmarx, while effective, does not match this level of continuous monitoring.
- G2 users highlight Checkmarx's strong Customization options, scoring 9.0, allowing teams to tailor the software to their specific needs, while GuardRails, with a lower score of 8.0, is perceived as less flexible in this area.
- Users on G2 report that GuardRails provides superior Quality of Support with a score of 8.5, often citing responsive customer service, compared to Checkmarx's score of 8.3, which, while still good, does not meet the same level of user satisfaction.
- Reviewers mention that Checkmarx's API / Integrations capabilities are robust, allowing for seamless integration with existing tools, which is a critical feature for enterprise users, while GuardRails, although functional, does not offer the same breadth of integrations.
- Users say that GuardRails' Reporting and Analytics features, scoring 8.7, provide clear insights into security posture, which many find easier to interpret than Checkmarx's reporting, which, despite a solid score of 8.3, is seen as less user-friendly.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Checkmarx
No pricing availableGuardRails
Free
$0.00
2 Seat Per Month
For personal projects.
- Repositories: Up to 2
- Language Support: Limited (Python, Javascript, Solidity and Terraform)
- Scanning: Pull Requests (limited)
Free Trial
Checkmarx
Free Trial is available
GuardRails
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
27
8.6
27
Ease of Use
8.2
27
8.3
26
Ease of Setup
7.7
13
8.5
14
Ease of Admin
7.9
13
8.7
14
Quality of Support
8.3
22
8.5
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
12
9.4
14
Product Direction (% positive)
7.5
23
9.1
27
Features by Category
Administration
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Analysis
8.6
6
8.7
5
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
9.3
5
8.7
5
Not enough data
Testing
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
5.3
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Extensibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Assessment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
9.7
5
Management
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.0
5
Processes
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
7
Documentation
Not enough data
9.2
14
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
9.0
14
Security
Not enough data
7.1
13
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.0
13
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Checkmarx and GuardRails are categorized as Static Code Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Secure Code Review, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Unique Categories
Checkmarx is categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
GuardRails is categorized as Secure Code Training, Software Composition Analysis, Container Security, and DevOps Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Checkmarx
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GuardRails
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Computer & Network Security
9.4%
Banking
9.4%
Automotive
6.3%
Other
43.8%
Information Technology and Services
31.0%
Financial Services
27.6%
Computer Software
20.7%
Internet
6.9%
Non-Profit Organization Management
3.4%
Other
10.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Checkmarx used for?
2 Comments
SS
Checkmarx is a static code analysis tool used for SAST (Static application security testing)Read more
Which testing method does Checkmarx support?
1 Comment
SS
Checkmarx does support all these testing methodologies -Sast, Dast, IAST, SCA Read more
GuardRails has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
