Users report that F5 NGINX excels in performance and reliability, achieving a score of 9.5, while Charles Proxy falls short in this area, indicating that F5 NGINX is better suited for high-demand environments.
Reviewers mention that F5 NGINX offers superior logging and reporting capabilities with a score of 9.3, compared to Charles Proxy, which lacks comprehensive reporting features, making it less effective for detailed analysis.
G2 users highlight that F5 NGINX provides robust security features, particularly in SSL/TLS processing with a score of 9.0, while Charles Proxy's security monitoring features are rated lower, suggesting a potential vulnerability in sensitive environments.
Users on G2 indicate that F5 NGINX has a more favorable ease of use rating at 8.4, compared to Charles Proxy's 7.2, which suggests that F5 NGINX may be more user-friendly for teams without extensive technical expertise.
Reviewers say that F5 NGINX's API and integrations score of 8.0 is a strong point, allowing for better customization and flexibility, whereas Charles Proxy's lower score in this area may limit its adaptability in diverse tech stacks.
Users report that F5 NGINX's management features, particularly in server management with a score of 8.9, are more advanced than those of Charles Proxy, which could lead to more efficient operations and reduced downtime.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Charles Proxy
No pricing available
F5 NGINX
NGINX Plus, Single Instance
Starting at $2500
per year
24/7 Enterprise support with 30-minute SLA is available, for $5,000/year per instance.
We also provide Basic support for $2,500/year and Professional support for $3,500/year for less-critical deployments.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.