Users report that Keras excels in ease of use, with a star rating of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for beginners in deep learning, while Chainer, with a rating of 7.9, is noted for having a steeper learning curve.
Reviewers mention that Keras offers superior documentation and support, which is crucial for new users, whereas Chainer's documentation is considered less comprehensive, leading to challenges in onboarding.
G2 users highlight Keras's strong performance in model optimization, particularly with its built-in features for hyperparameter tuning, while Chainer users report that it lacks some of these automated tuning capabilities, making optimization more manual.
Users on G2 indicate that Keras has a more intuitive user interface, which enhances the overall user experience, while Chainer's interface is described as less user-friendly, potentially hindering productivity.
Reviewers say that Keras shines in its deep learning capabilities, particularly with its support for transfer learning, which is highly valued in the community, whereas Chainer is noted for its flexibility but lacks some of the advanced features that Keras offers.
Users report that Keras's scalability is a significant advantage, allowing for seamless integration with larger datasets, while Chainer, although capable, is often seen as less efficient in handling large-scale data processing.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Chainer
No pricing available
Keras
No pricing available
Free Trial
Chainer
No trial information available
Keras
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.9
8
8.9
50
Ease of Use
7.9
8
8.9
50
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.8
24
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.8
20
Quality of Support
7.7
8
7.8
41
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.