Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cerner CareTracker and ESO EHR 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ECP
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Eldermark
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Practice Better
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (44.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (73.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cerner CareTracker
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (44.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cerner CareTrackerESO EHR
Star Rating
(19)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (73.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ESO EHRSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ESO EHR excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for organizations looking for a quick implementation, while Cerner CareTracker, with a score of 8.5, is noted to have a more complex setup process.
- Reviewers mention that Cerner CareTracker offers superior ease of use, scoring 8.9 compared to ESO EHR's 7.9, indicating that users find Cerner's interface more intuitive and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that ESO EHR shines in its performance reporting capabilities, particularly with features like "Patient Health Information Management," which allows for comprehensive tracking of patient data, whereas Cerner CareTracker's performance reporting is seen as less robust.
- Users on G2 report that both products have strong data management features, but ESO EHR is particularly praised for its "Clinical Workflow Management," which streamlines processes effectively, while Cerner CareTracker is noted for its "Billing" capabilities, which some users find more efficient.
- Reviewers mention that ESO EHR has a better product direction with a positive score of 8.1, suggesting that users feel confident in the future development of the software, while Cerner CareTracker's lower score of 5.8 raises concerns about its ongoing improvements and updates.
- Users say that both products have solid security and privacy controls, but ESO EHR is often highlighted for its comprehensive "ePHI Storage" solutions, which provide peace of mind regarding patient data security, whereas Cerner CareTracker's security features are considered standard but not as advanced.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cerner CareTracker
No pricing availableESO EHR
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cerner CareTracker
No trial information availableESO EHR
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
16
8.3
12
Ease of Use
8.9
16
7.9
12
Ease of Setup
8.5
8
9.3
5
Ease of Admin
8.5
8
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.3
15
8.2
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
7
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
5.8
14
8.1
12
Features by Category
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytic Tools - Healthcare Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Clinical Workflow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Patient Health Information Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - EHR
Not enough data
Not enough data
Emergency Response
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Business Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cerner CareTracker and ESO EHR are categorized as EHR
Unique Categories
Cerner CareTracker is categorized as Assisted Living and Healthcare Analytics
ESO EHR is categorized as Emergency Medical Services
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cerner CareTracker
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ESO EHR
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Hospital & Health Care
72.0%
Medical Practice
12.0%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.0%
Mental Health Care
4.0%
Government Administration
4.0%
Other
4.0%
Public Safety
31.6%
Medical Practice
21.1%
Hospital & Health Care
21.1%
Government Administration
10.5%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.3%
Other
10.5%
Discussions
Cerner CareTracker has no discussions with answers
ESO EHR has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
