Compare Celoxis and Planview AdaptiveWork 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (48.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$10.00 1 User Per Month
No pricing available
Celoxis
Star Rating
(593)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$10.00 1 User Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansPlanview AdaptiveWork
Star Rating
(530)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Planview AdaptiveWorkSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Celoxis excels in providing real-time project status updates, which significantly enhances the efficiency of weekly reviews. Users appreciate how it surfaces project health without relying on project managers to compile status updates, making meetings more productive and aligned.
- Users say that Planview AdaptiveWork offers a high level of customization, allowing teams to tailor the software to fit their specific needs. This flexibility is highlighted by reviewers who mention its rich features for managing various projects and tasks, making it suitable for diverse organizational requirements.
- Reviewers mention that Celoxis stands out for its robust project risk tracking capabilities. Users find this feature invaluable, as it helps identify potential issues early on, preventing minor problems from escalating into major delays, which is crucial for maintaining project timelines.
- According to verified reviews, Planview AdaptiveWork has a strong focus on task management, with features like creation and assignment, due dates, and dependencies receiving high praise. Users find these tools effective for keeping track of ongoing projects and ensuring that tasks are prioritized appropriately.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Celoxis has a more user-friendly interface, with higher ratings for ease of use and setup. This aspect is particularly beneficial for teams looking to onboard quickly and start utilizing the software without extensive training or support.
- Users report that while Planview AdaptiveWork has a wealth of features, some find it challenging to navigate due to its complexity. This can lead to a steeper learning curve compared to Celoxis, which is often praised for its intuitive design and straightforward functionality.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Celoxis
Core
$10.00
1 User Per Month
- Advanced Analytics & B.I.
- Aggregated Dashboards
- Gantt Charts
Planview AdaptiveWork
No pricing availableFree Trial
Celoxis
Free Trial is available
Planview AdaptiveWork
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
425
8.4
443
Ease of Use
9.0
431
7.7
447
Ease of Setup
8.9
334
7.3
184
Ease of Admin
8.6
143
7.8
185
Quality of Support
9.0
417
8.4
372
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
142
8.4
181
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
422
7.8
444
Features by Category
Tasks
9.0
294
|
Verified
9.2
83
|
Verified
9.0
297
|
Verified
9.0
87
|
Verified
9.0
292
|
Verified
9.0
48
8.9
290
|
Verified
9.0
78
|
Verified
8.9
290
|
Verified
9.0
77
8.8
285
8.9
45
8.8
290
|
Verified
8.5
82
|
Verified
8.8
285
8.7
77
Projects
9.1
297
|
Verified
9.2
82
|
Verified
8.8
290
|
Verified
9.2
83
|
Verified
9.0
292
|
Verified
9.1
79
|
Verified
8.8
288
|
Verified
8.9
76
|
Verified
8.9
293
|
Verified
9.0
82
|
Verified
9.0
293
8.9
71
8.9
284
8.9
76
8.9
284
|
Verified
9.0
85
|
Verified
8.8
287
9.0
73
8.9
288
9.2
74
|
Verified
8.9
285
|
Verified
8.8
71
|
Verified
Resource Management
8.9
289
|
Verified
8.9
77
|
Verified
9.0
294
|
Verified
8.8
77
|
Verified
9.0
297
|
Verified
9.0
76
|
Verified
Project Monitoring
9.0
287
|
Verified
9.0
76
|
Verified
8.9
299
|
Verified
8.9
77
|
Verified
9.1
297
|
Verified
9.1
84
|
Verified
Generative AI
8.8
237
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Project Management
8.9
124
Not enough data
8.8
123
Not enough data
9.0
123
Not enough data
9.1
124
Not enough data
9.0
123
Not enough data
8.9
124
Not enough data
9.1
123
Feature Not Available
Portfolio Management
9.0
204
|
Verified
8.4
110
|
Verified
9.0
208
|
Verified
8.4
125
|
Verified
9.0
205
|
Verified
8.4
109
|
Verified
8.9
204
|
Verified
8.3
95
|
Verified
Project Management
9.0
207
|
Verified
8.4
140
|
Verified
9.1
208
|
Verified
8.3
133
|
Verified
9.0
205
|
Verified
8.3
104
|
Verified
Resource Management
8.9
205
|
Verified
8.5
124
|
Verified
9.0
205
|
Verified
8.3
127
|
Verified
8.9
202
|
Verified
8.1
119
|
Verified
Data & Analytics
8.9
202
|
Verified
8.2
124
|
Verified
9.1
202
|
Verified
8.0
126
|
Verified
8.9
204
|
Verified
8.0
124
|
Verified
8.9
199
|
Verified
8.1
105
|
Verified
Strategy - Project and Portfolio Management
8.8
161
Not enough data
9.0
160
Not enough data
8.8
161
Not enough data
8.8
159
Not enough data
8.9
160
Not enough data
8.8
159
Not enough data
8.9
157
Not enough data
9.0
159
Not enough data
8.9
158
Not enough data
9.0
159
Not enough data
Planning
8.9
173
Not enough data
9.0
174
Not enough data
8.9
173
Not enough data
Optimization
9.0
174
Not enough data
8.8
171
Not enough data
8.8
172
Not enough data
Customer Management
Not enough data
8.9
25
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
26
|
Verified
Project Management
Not enough data
9.0
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
29
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.3
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
29
|
Verified
Accounting
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.4
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.0
25
Not enough data
9.1
26
|
Verified
Portfolio Management
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.1
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
25
Analytics
Not enough data
9.0
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
30
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
27
|
Verified
Administration
Not enough data
8.5
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
28
|
Verified
Platform
Not enough data
8.5
26
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
27
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
26
|
Verified
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Professional Services Automation
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Professional Services Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
9.2
52
Not enough data
9.1
51
Not enough data
9.1
47
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.1
47
Not enough data
9.2
50
Project management
Not enough data
9.3
51
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.4
50
Not enough data
9.1
50
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
9.0
51
Workload
Not enough data
9.1
50
Not enough data
9.1
50
Not enough data
8.9
49
Not enough data
8.9
47
Communication & Collaboration
Not enough data
8.9
47
Not enough data
8.8
46
Not enough data
9.2
47
Cost Management
Not enough data
8.7
46
Not enough data
9.1
48
Not enough data
8.6
45
Integration
Not enough data
9.3
39
Not enough data
9.1
39
Not enough data
9.1
37
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Work Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Planning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Workflow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Celoxis and Planview AdaptiveWork are categorized as Project Management and Project and Portfolio Management
Unique Categories
Celoxis is categorized as Resource Management
Planview AdaptiveWork is categorized as Work Management, Professional Services Automation, and Product Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Celoxis
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Planview AdaptiveWork
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
19.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.6%
Marketing and Advertising
12.4%
Construction
3.7%
Consulting
2.8%
Other
43.1%
Information Technology and Services
14.8%
Computer Software
12.5%
Marketing and Advertising
8.6%
Financial Services
4.9%
Hospital & Health Care
2.9%
Other
56.3%
Discussions
How has Celoxis transformed your project management approach, and what do you like most about it?
2 Comments
SK
Celoxis has significantly transformed our project management approach by bringing everything into one unified platform. What I like most about it is its...Read more
Celoxis has no more discussions with answers
How can we automate the flow and approval of QA testing and release?
3 Comments
DW
Hi Ashraf,
We're running our entire Demand Management Process in Clarizen One using the Request Module and a series of Custom Actions. We set this up...Read more
Why when i am adding new milestone from a project, i need to add the name of the project? bug?
2 Comments
AS
Actually if you open the project plan (schedule) and you try to add a milestone Clarizen doesn't ask about the project name. I tested it and it works.Read more
How can I create more automation options at the Configure tab?
2 Comments
DG
Hi Christopher - our Customer Success site is quite well visited by Clarizen team and other customers so you can get good feedback there for questions like...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
