# Cassandra vs ScyllaDB Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- **G2 reviewers report** that ScyllaDB excels in **operational simplicity** and **cost efficiency** , making it a preferred choice for users looking to optimize their infrastructure. Many users appreciate its ability to deliver high performance on fewer nodes, which significantly reduces costs.
- **Users say** that Cassandra is a **highly scalable database** with strong consistency across nodes, making it a solid option for those managing large amounts of unstructured data. Its open-source nature and wide community support are also frequently highlighted as major advantages.
- **Reviewers mention** that ScyllaDB's **scalability** is a standout feature, allowing for seamless orchestration of multiple events. This capability is particularly beneficial for users who require low latency and the ability to scale up easily, enhancing their overall experience.
- **According to verified reviews** , Cassandra users appreciate its **blazing fast speeds** and the ability to handle large datasets without the complications of painful joins, thanks to its denormalization features. However, some users have noted challenges in matching specific workflow needs.
- **G2 reviewers highlight** that ScyllaDB's **customer support** is notably strong, with users feeling that the team is genuinely invested in their experience. This level of engagement contributes to a positive user experience and fosters a sense of community.
- **Users report** that while both databases have similar ease of setup, ScyllaDB tends to have a slight edge in **user experience** , with many finding its interface more intuitive and easier to navigate compared to Cassandra, which can sometimes feel more complex.



| | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.1 out of 5 | 4.5 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 35 | 427 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (48.5% of reviews) | Small-Business (41.8% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### Cassandra

**Not enough data**

### ScyllaDB

Pros:
- Performance (57 reviews)
- Speed (49 reviews)

Cons:
- Learning Curve (21 reviews)
- Limited Features (13 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.3 (29 reviews) | 8.8 (333 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 7.8 (29 reviews) | 8.5 (342 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 8.2 (18 reviews) | 8.3 (250 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 7.9 (16 reviews) | 8.2 (125 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 7.5 (24 reviews) | 8.6 (312 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 7.4 (13 reviews) | 8.7 (105 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 6.9 (26 reviews) | 9.0 (324 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### Cassandra

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available

### ScyllaDB

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Key Value Databases

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Cassandra** | N/A | N/A |
| **ScyllaDB** | 8.6/10 | 183 |

#### Data Management

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Data Model** | Not enough data | 8.7 (162 reviews) | 
| **Data Types** | Not enough data | 8.8 (163 reviews) | 

#### Availability

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Auto Sharding** | Not enough data | 9.0 (157 reviews) | 
| **Auto Recovery** | Not enough data | 8.6 (154 reviews) | 
| **Data Replication** | Not enough data | 8.7 (156 reviews) | 

#### Performance 

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Integrated Cache** | Not enough data | 8.8 (148 reviews) | 

#### Security

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Role-Based Authorization** | Not enough data | 8.4 (141 reviews) | 
| **Authentication** | Not enough data | 8.5 (144 reviews) | 
| **Audit Logs** | Not enough data | 8.5 (142 reviews) | 
| **Encryption** | Not enough data | 8.6 (143 reviews) | 

#### Support

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Multi-Model** | Not enough data | 8.5 (139 reviews) | 
| **Operating Systems** | Not enough data | Feature Not Available | 

### Wide Column Database

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Cassandra** | N/A | N/A |
| **ScyllaDB** | 8.5/10 | 83 |

#### Storage

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Data Storage Method** | Not enough data | 8.5 (70 reviews) | 

#### Scalability

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Database Scalability** | Not enough data | 9.1 (78 reviews) | 
| **Auto Sharding** | Not enough data | 8.7 (71 reviews) | 

#### Security

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Order Preserving Encryption** | Not enough data | 8.2 (64 reviews) | 

#### Support

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Data Types Support** | Not enough data | 8.6 (74 reviews) | 
| **Different Operating Systems** | Not enough data | Feature Not Available | 
| **Multi model Database Support** | Not enough data | 8.3 (68 reviews) | 

#### Agentic AI - Wide Column Database

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Decision Making** | Not enough data | 7.9 (7 reviews) | 

### Database as a Service (DBaaS)

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Cassandra** | N/A | N/A |
| **ScyllaDB** | 8.8/10 | 163 |

#### Configuration

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Application Performance** | Not enough data | 9.2 (152 reviews) | 
| **Orchestration** | Not enough data | 8.8 (142 reviews) | 
| **Database Monitoring** | Not enough data | 8.9 (151 reviews) | 
| **Anomaly Detection** | Not enough data | 8.4 (136 reviews) | 
| **Network Security** | Not enough data | 8.7 (139 reviews) | 

#### Database Administration

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Provisioning** | Not enough data | 8.8 (137 reviews) | 
| **Governance** | Not enough data | 8.7 (133 reviews) | 
| **Auditing** | Not enough data | 8.7 (133 reviews) | 

#### Availability

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Scalability** | Not enough data | 9.5 (153 reviews) | 
| **Backup** | Not enough data | 8.9 (147 reviews) | 
| **Archiving** | Not enough data | 8.9 (136 reviews) | 
| **Indexing** | Not enough data | 8.9 (145 reviews) | 

#### Security

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Data Masking** | Not enough data | 8.7 (123 reviews) | 
| **Authentication And Single Sign-On** | Not enough data | 8.7 (126 reviews) | 
| **Data Anonymization** | Not enough data | 8.7 (126 reviews) | 

#### Data Management

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Data Replication** | Not enough data | 8.9 (137 reviews) | 
| **Advanced Data Analytics** | Not enough data | 8.7 (129 reviews) | 

### NoSQL Databases

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Cassandra** | N/A | N/A |
| **ScyllaDB** | N/A | N/A |

#### Database Features

| Feature | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Storage** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Availability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Stability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Scalability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Manipulation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Query Language** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (2):** [Wide Column Database Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/wide-column-database), [Key Value Databases](https://www.g2.com/categories/key-value-databases)


**Unique to ScyllaDB (1):** [Database as a Service (DBaaS) Providers](https://www.g2.com/categories/database-as-a-service-dbaas)


---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | Cassandra | ScyllaDB | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 18.2% | 41.8% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 33.3% | 29.6% | 
| **Enterprise** | 48.5% | 28.6% | 

### By Industry

#### Cassandra

- **Information Technology and Services:** 30.3%
- **Internet:** 18.2%
- **Computer Software:** 12.1%
- **Retail:** 9.1%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 6.1%
- **Telecommunications:** 3.0%
- **Research:** 3.0%
- **Political Organization:** 3.0%
- **Marketing and Advertising:** 3.0%
- **Higher Education:** 3.0%
- **Other:** 9.1%

#### ScyllaDB

- **Computer Software:** 29.8%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 13.2%
- **Financial Services:** 6.1%
- **Education Management:** 3.7%
- **Banking:** 3.7%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 3.2%
- **Telecommunications:** 2.6%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 2.4%
- **Consulting:** 2.4%
- **Entertainment:** 2.1%
- **Other:** 30.9%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to Cassandra

- [Redis Software](https://www.g2.com/products/redis-software/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (134 reviews)
- [Amazon DynamoDB](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-web-services-aws-amazon-dynamodb/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (529 reviews)
- [Arango](https://www.g2.com/products/arango/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (115 reviews)
- [Azure Cosmos DB](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-cosmos-db/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (68 reviews)
- [Couchbase](https://www.g2.com/products/couchbase/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (150 reviews)
- [OrientDB](https://www.g2.com/products/orientdb/reviews) — 3.9/5 stars (60 reviews)
- [Aerospike](https://www.g2.com/products/aerospike/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (83 reviews)
- [Azure Table Storage](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-table-storage/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (16 reviews)
- [Cloudera Data Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudera-cloudera-data-platform/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (136 reviews)
- [Amazon ElastiCache](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-elasticache/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (87 reviews)

### Alternatives to ScyllaDB

- [Couchbase](https://www.g2.com/products/couchbase/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (150 reviews)
- [Amazon DynamoDB](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-web-services-aws-amazon-dynamodb/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (529 reviews)
- [Redis Software](https://www.g2.com/products/redis-software/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (134 reviews)
- [Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-relational-database-service-rds/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (906 reviews)
- [MongoDB Atlas](https://www.g2.com/products/mongodb-atlas/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (370 reviews)
- [SAP HANA Cloud](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-hana-cloud-2025-10-01/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (620 reviews)
- [Oracle Database](https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-database/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (1009 reviews)
- [IBM Db2](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-db2/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (682 reviews)
- [Amazon Aurora](https://www.g2.com/products/amazon-aurora/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (457 reviews)
- [DigitalOcean](https://www.g2.com/products/digitalocean/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (746 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### Cassandra

No discussions available for this product.

### ScyllaDB

- Title: [What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-agenda-for-the-coming-quarter-what-new-features-will-be-introduced) — 2 comments, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x

• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base..."
- Title: [Is ScyllaDB free?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-scylladb-free) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "ScyllaDB is available as a “source available” solution. You can utilize the complete ScyllaDB feature set for free if your deployment remains under 10 TB of..."
- Title: [How does ScyllaDB handle sharding and replication?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-does-scylladb-handle-sharding-and-replication) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "ScyllaDB follows a shard-per-core design that assigns specific data partitions to individual CPU cores, reducing internal contention. It employs consistent..."
- Title: [What are the main tradeoffs when switching to ScyllaDB?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-main-tradeoffs-when-switching-to-scylladb) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "As a NoSQL database, ScyllaDB prioritizes performance and scalability over traditional relational features like complex joins or ad-hoc reporting. While it..."
- Title: [Why is ScyllaDB faster than alternatives?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/why-is-scylladb-faster-than-alternatives) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "The speed of ScyllaDB stems from its shared-nothing, shard-per-core architecture, which maximizes CPU efficiency and concurrency. Built on the Seastar..."

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/cassandra-vs-scylladb)