Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cassandra and ScyllaDB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (40.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cassandra
Star Rating
(35)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CassandraScyllaDB
Star Rating
(356)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ScyllaDB excels in scalability with a score of 9.2, allowing for seamless handling of large datasets, while Cassandra's scalability score is slightly lower at 8.9, which some users feel may limit performance under heavy loads.
- Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's ease of use is a standout feature, scoring 8.6, compared to Cassandra's 7.8. Many users appreciate ScyllaDB's intuitive interface and straightforward setup process, making it more accessible for teams without extensive database experience.
- G2 users highlight ScyllaDB's superior quality of support, with a score of 8.3, compared to Cassandra's 7.5. Reviewers often note that ScyllaDB's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, which enhances the overall user experience.
- Users on G2 report that ScyllaDB offers better performance in terms of integrated caching, scoring 8.0, which helps in reducing latency during data retrieval. In contrast, Cassandra's integrated cache performance is perceived as less effective, leading to slower response times in some scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's advanced data analytics capabilities, scoring 8.5, provide more robust insights compared to Cassandra's offerings. Users appreciate the ability to perform complex queries and analytics more efficiently with ScyllaDB.
- Users say that while both products offer solid data replication features, ScyllaDB's replication score of 8.6 is often praised for its reliability and speed, whereas Cassandra's score of 8.1 indicates room for improvement, particularly in high-availability scenarios.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cassandra
No pricing availableScyllaDB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cassandra
No trial information availableScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
29
8.8
300
Ease of Use
7.8
29
8.6
309
Ease of Setup
8.2
18
8.3
218
Ease of Admin
7.9
16
8.2
115
Quality of Support
7.5
24
8.5
280
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.4
13
8.7
95
Product Direction (% positive)
6.9
26
9.2
292
Features by Category
Data Management
Not enough data
8.6
143
Not enough data
8.6
148
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
8.6
141
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
139
Security
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
8.5
134
Not enough data
8.4
131
Not enough data
8.5
130
Support
Not enough data
8.5
128
Not enough data
8.4
135
Storage
Not enough data
8.4
66
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
71
Not enough data
8.6
68
Security
Not enough data
8.1
63
Support
Not enough data
8.5
70
Not enough data
8.4
69
Not enough data
8.2
65
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.0
5
Configuration
Not enough data
9.2
146
Not enough data
8.8
139
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
8.7
135
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.7
131
Availability
Not enough data
9.4
144
Not enough data
8.9
141
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
8.8
140
Security
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
8.7
123
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
132
Not enough data
8.7
126
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cassandra and ScyllaDB are categorized as Wide Column Database and Key Value Databases
Unique Categories
Cassandra has no unique categories
ScyllaDB is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cassandra
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.3%
Internet
18.2%
Computer Software
12.1%
Retail
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
6.1%
Other
24.2%
Computer Software
29.3%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Financial Services
5.8%
Education Management
3.5%
Banking
3.5%
Other
45.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Cassandra has no discussions with answers
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
