Compare Cassandra and ScyllaDB 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cassandra
Star Rating
(35)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CassandraScyllaDB
Star Rating
(422)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that ScyllaDB excels in operational simplicity and cost efficiency, making it a preferred choice for users looking to optimize their infrastructure. Many users appreciate its ability to deliver high performance on fewer nodes, which significantly reduces costs.
- Users say that Cassandra is a highly scalable database with strong consistency across nodes, making it a solid option for those managing large amounts of unstructured data. Its open-source nature and wide community support are also frequently highlighted as major advantages.
- Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's scalability is a standout feature, allowing for seamless orchestration of multiple events. This capability is particularly beneficial for users who require low latency and the ability to scale up easily, enhancing their overall experience.
- According to verified reviews, Cassandra users appreciate its blazing fast speeds and the ability to handle large datasets without the complications of painful joins, thanks to its denormalization features. However, some users have noted challenges in matching specific workflow needs.
- G2 reviewers highlight that ScyllaDB's customer support is notably strong, with users feeling that the team is genuinely invested in their experience. This level of engagement contributes to a positive user experience and fosters a sense of community.
- Users report that while both databases have similar ease of setup, ScyllaDB tends to have a slight edge in user experience, with many finding its interface more intuitive and easier to navigate compared to Cassandra, which can sometimes feel more complex.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cassandra
No pricing availableScyllaDB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cassandra
No trial information availableScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
29
8.8
330
Ease of Use
7.8
29
8.5
339
Ease of Setup
8.2
18
8.2
247
Ease of Admin
7.9
16
8.2
125
Quality of Support
7.5
24
8.6
309
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.4
13
8.7
105
Product Direction (% positive)
6.9
26
9.0
321
Features by Category
Data Management
Not enough data
8.7
161
Not enough data
8.7
162
Availability
Not enough data
9.0
156
Not enough data
8.6
153
Not enough data
8.7
155
Performance
Not enough data
8.8
147
Security
Not enough data
8.4
140
Not enough data
8.5
143
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
8.6
142
Support
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Storage
Not enough data
8.5
68
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
76
Not enough data
8.7
69
Security
Not enough data
8.2
62
Support
Not enough data
8.5
72
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.2
66
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.5
6
Configuration
Not enough data
9.2
150
Not enough data
8.8
140
Not enough data
8.9
149
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.7
138
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.7
132
Availability
Not enough data
9.5
151
Not enough data
8.8
146
Not enough data
8.9
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Security
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.7
125
Not enough data
8.7
125
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
128
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cassandra and ScyllaDB are categorized as Wide Column Database and Key Value Databases
Unique Categories
Cassandra has no unique categories
ScyllaDB is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cassandra
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.3%
Internet
18.2%
Computer Software
12.1%
Retail
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
6.1%
Other
24.2%
Computer Software
30.1%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Financial Services
6.1%
Education Management
3.7%
Banking
3.7%
Other
43.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Cassandra has no discussions with answers
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
