Users report that Cassandra excels in scalability, with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for enterprises that require handling large volumes of data efficiently. In contrast, OrientDB's scalability score of 7.6 indicates it may not perform as well under heavy loads.
Reviewers mention that Cassandra's data model is highly rated at 9.0, which allows for flexible data structures, while OrientDB's data model score of 8.6 is still strong but may not offer the same level of flexibility for complex data relationships.
G2 users highlight that Cassandra's built-in search feature scores 8.0, providing decent search capabilities, but users on G2 note that OrientDB's built-in search is slightly better at 8.2, making it more effective for applications requiring robust search functionalities.
Reviewers say that while both products have solid support for multi-model databases, OrientDB shines with a support score of 8.0, compared to Cassandra's lower score, indicating a more comprehensive approach to handling various data types.
Users report that Cassandra's auto recovery feature scores only 6.9, which some find lacking in reliability, whereas OrientDB's overall security features, including role-based authorization and encryption, score higher at 8.0, making it a more secure option for sensitive data.
Reviewers mention that while both products have a good quality of support, Cassandra's score of 7.5 is slightly lower than OrientDB's 7.4, suggesting that users may find OrientDB's support more responsive and helpful in resolving issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cassandra
No pricing available
OrientDB
Community
FREE
The Community Edition is released with Apache2 license, that means FREE for any purpose.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.