Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Carbide and Secureframe 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Comp AI
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Conveyor
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Decrypt Compliance
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (79.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (67.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us 1 Company Size and Package
Carbide
Star Rating
(86)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (79.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CarbideSecureframe
Star Rating
(767)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (67.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Company Size and Package
Free Trial is available
Learn more about SecureframeSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Secureframe excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to Carbide. Users appreciate the platform's ability to automate evidence collection, which is described as a "game-changer" for lean IT teams, allowing for seamless integration with tools like AWS and GitHub.
- According to verified reviews, Secureframe's implementation process is praised for its ease, with many users noting that the initial setup was straightforward. In contrast, while Carbide offers a user-friendly video interface, some users still find the onboarding process less intuitive compared to Secureframe's streamlined approach.
- Users say that Secureframe provides a centralized dashboard for compliance tasks, making it easier to manage security training and document submissions. This feature is highlighted as particularly beneficial for those handling SOC-2 compliance, whereas Carbide, while having competent advisors, may not offer the same level of centralized task management.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have strong support, with Secureframe receiving high marks for its quality of support. Users have noted the helpfulness of Secureframe's team, while Carbide users appreciate the dedicated guidance from advisors, which can be invaluable for newcomers to SaaS compliance.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Secureframe's compliance monitoring capabilities are robust, with users noting the effectiveness of its tools in tracking compliance requirements. Carbide, while offering solid features, has received feedback indicating that its compliance monitoring may not be as comprehensive as Secureframe's.
- According to recent user feedback, Secureframe's ability to gather necessary information for audits without manual effort is a significant advantage. In contrast, while Carbide's online solution is easy to learn, some users feel it lacks the depth of features that Secureframe provides, particularly in automated documentation and policy enforcement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Carbide
No pricing availableSecureframe
Standard
Contact Us
1 Company Size and Package
- Secureframe Federal
- Secureframe Fundamentals
- Secureframe Complete
Free Trial
Carbide
No trial information availableSecureframe
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
67
9.3
671
Ease of Use
8.9
66
8.9
689
Ease of Setup
9.3
46
8.8
575
Ease of Admin
8.9
45
9.0
467
Quality of Support
9.4
66
9.4
645
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
46
9.5
465
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
62
9.6
662
Features by Category
Security
8.1
18
9.4
232
7.5
17
8.3
209
7.7
19
8.2
205
7.9
18
8.7
208
Compliance
9.0
21
9.2
218
8.5
19
8.9
212
8.8
20
9.1
215
Administration
8.8
23
9.2
220
Feature Not Available
9.0
213
7.6
20
8.5
207
Functionality
9.5
23
Not enough data
9.0
22
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
21
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
Assesment
8.6
38
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Training
9.0
39
Not enough data
9.1
39
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Administration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
35
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.5
208
Not enough data
8.9
209
Not enough data
8.7
208
Not enough data
9.1
211
Risk assessment
Not enough data
9.1
206
Not enough data
8.1
188
Not enough data
8.8
204
Not enough data
7.2
108
Generative AI - Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment
Not enough data
7.5
97
Not enough data
7.6
98
Risk Assessment
Not enough data
9.2
180
Not enough data
7.6
102
Risk Control
Not enough data
8.8
178
Not enough data
9.3
190
Not enough data
8.6
178
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.6
177
Not enough data
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.9
179
Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
182
Not enough data
9.1
180
Not enough data
8.8
172
Agentic AI - Third Party & Supplier Risk Management
Not enough data
7.0
91
Not enough data
7.4
92
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.0
137
Not enough data
6.9
137
Workflows - Audit Management
Not enough data
8.6
146
Not enough data
8.6
147
Not enough data
8.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
146
Not enough data
8.3
144
Documentation - Audit Management
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.8
144
Reporting & Analytics - Audit Management
Not enough data
9.1
151
Not enough data
9.0
146
Not enough data
9.4
145
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Security Compliance
7.8
9
7.2
287
8.5
9
7.7
288
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Carbide and Secureframe are categorized as Security Compliance and Cloud Compliance
Unique Categories
Carbide is categorized as Privacy Policy Generator and Security Awareness Training
Secureframe is categorized as Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment, Third Party & Supplier Risk Management, and Audit Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Carbide
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Secureframe
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
19.8%
Information Technology and Services
15.1%
E-Learning
5.8%
Accounting
5.8%
Financial Services
4.7%
Other
48.8%
Computer Software
27.2%
Information Technology and Services
17.6%
Financial Services
9.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.7%
Marketing and Advertising
3.9%
Other
37.0%
Discussions
How can we get the most out of Carbide for our young startup company?
1 Comment
Official Response from Carbide
Hi Jacob, thanks for your question!
As you know the Carbide platform is designed to help organizations build and manage their security and compliance...Read more
Carbide has no more discussions with answers
What does Secureframe do?
4 Comments
MK
SecureFrame is a compliance software platform that helps businesses achieve and maintain compliance with various regulatory requirements, including SOC 2...Read more
What is the difference between ISO and soc2?
4 Comments
AC
I've had it explained to me that ISO is of more interest in Europe and SOC2 is of more interest in the United States (and maybe North America?). Someone...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
