Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Capistrano and Google Cloud Shell 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (88.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (44.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Capistrano
Star Rating
(11)3.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (88.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CapistranoGoogle Cloud Shell
Star Rating
(26)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud ShellSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Google Cloud Shell excels in its integration with Google Cloud services, allowing for seamless management of cloud resources, while Capistrano is praised for its robust deployment capabilities, particularly in automating application releases.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Shell's ease of use is highlighted by its intuitive interface and built-in code editor, making it accessible for users with varying technical skills, whereas Capistrano's learning curve can be steep, especially for those unfamiliar with Ruby.
- G2 users indicate that Google Cloud Shell's quality of support is rated at 8.1, with many appreciating the extensive documentation and community forums, while Capistrano users express concerns over limited support options, which are reflected in its lower ratings.
- Users on G2 report that Google Cloud Shell's product direction is highly rated at 9.6, suggesting a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates, in contrast to Capistrano, which has a lower rating of 5.6, indicating potential stagnation in its development.
- Reviewers say that Google Cloud Shell's ease of setup is a significant advantage, allowing users to get started quickly without extensive configuration, while Capistrano requires more initial setup and configuration, which can be a barrier for new users.
- Users mention that Google Cloud Shell's overall performance in meeting requirements is rated at 9.0, showcasing its reliability for cloud-based tasks, while Capistrano, with a rating of 8.5, is still effective but may not meet the needs of all users as efficiently.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Capistrano
No pricing availableGoogle Cloud Shell
No pricing availableFree Trial
Capistrano
No trial information availableGoogle Cloud Shell
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
8
8.9
19
Ease of Use
7.5
8
8.9
20
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.4
8
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.4
8
Quality of Support
Not enough data
8.7
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.5
8
Product Direction (% positive)
5.6
8
9.4
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Capistrano and Google Cloud Shell are categorized as Other IT Management
Unique Categories
Capistrano has no unique categories
Google Cloud Shell has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Capistrano
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Google Cloud Shell
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Internet
22.2%
Professional Training & Coaching
11.1%
Information Technology and Services
11.1%
Hospitality
11.1%
Hospital & Health Care
11.1%
Other
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
28.0%
Computer Software
12.0%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.0%
Education Management
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
8.0%
Other
36.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Capistrano has no discussions with answers
Google Cloud Shell has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
