Compare Canto and Pimcore 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free
Canto
Star Rating
(1,732)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Learn more about CantoPimcore
Star Rating
(48)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Canto excels in user experience, with many praising its intuitive navigation and the way it categorizes topics, making it easy to find images that align with company guidelines. In contrast, while Pimcore offers a simple interface for managing data and experiences, some users find it less user-friendly for specific tasks.
- Users say that Canto's implementation process is quick and straightforward, with a clear onboarding wizard that helps new users get started efficiently. On the other hand, Pimcore, while customizable, can require more time to configure to fit unique business needs, which may lead to a steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that Canto provides excellent support, with a high quality of assistance reported by users. They appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Conversely, while Pimcore's support is generally good, some users feel it could be improved, especially in more complex scenarios.
- According to verified reviews, Canto shines in its ability to manage digital assets effectively, with users highlighting features like the availability of multiple file formats (PNG, JPEG, GIF) and a robust digital rights management system. Pimcore, while also capable, has received mixed feedback regarding its digital asset management capabilities.
- G2 reviewers report that Canto's organizational interface is well-designed, making it easy for teams to share and access images. Users have noted that it allows for seamless collaboration, which is a significant advantage over Pimcore, where some users have mentioned challenges in collaboration features.
- Users say that Canto's overall satisfaction is reflected in its high G2 Score, indicating a strong preference among users for its features and usability. In contrast, Pimcore's lower score suggests that while it has valuable features, it may not meet the expectations of all users as effectively as Canto does.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canto
Canto Digital Asset Management
Contact Us
Canto's platform, supported by a flexible and transparent pricing structure, caters to a diverse array of industries. It empowers companies ranging from teams of 50 employees to global enterprises to fuel their content delivery, maximizing their ROI.
- Increase content ROI
- Go to market faster
- Improve efficiency and streamline collaboration
Pimcore
Community Edition
Free
Build and experiment with the award-winning core of Pimcore—free of charge. The Community Edition offers essential PIM, MDM, DAM, and DXP features, recognized in the Gartner Magic Quadrant. Ideal for non-production use, academic environments, non-profits, and businesses with annual revenue under EUR/USD 5 million.
- PIM/MDM/DAM
- DXP/CMS/Commerce
- Unlimited Entities, Data & Users
Free Trial
Canto
No trial information availablePimcore
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
1,502
8.8
36
Ease of Use
8.7
1,514
8.2
36
Ease of Setup
8.3
934
7.8
23
Ease of Admin
8.7
869
8.6
21
Quality of Support
9.1
1,297
8.6
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
852
8.8
18
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
1,464
9.0
36
Features by Category
Interface and Performance
8.6
1249
|
Verified
8.3
18
|
Verified
8.5
1269
|
Verified
8.8
17
|
Verified
8.6
1287
|
Verified
8.7
19
|
Verified
8.5
1252
|
Verified
8.9
19
|
Verified
7.7
513
Not enough data
Asset Management
9.0
1219
|
Verified
9.1
17
|
Verified
8.8
1095
|
Verified
9.2
18
|
Verified
8.4
955
|
Verified
8.9
16
|
Verified
8.4
901
|
Verified
9.3
14
|
Verified
8.7
891
|
Verified
8.5
10
8.2
721
|
Verified
8.2
10
|
Verified
8.6
803
|
Verified
8.0
10
|
Verified
8.5
566
Not enough data
Media Types
8.6
1054
|
Verified
8.7
13
|
Verified
8.6
798
|
Verified
8.0
9
|
Verified
9.4
1261
|
Verified
9.2
17
|
Verified
Administration
8.2
708
|
Verified
8.1
14
|
Verified
8.7
1129
|
Verified
8.5
17
|
Verified
8.7
1085
|
Verified
9.0
12
|
Verified
7.9
757
|
Verified
8.3
10
|
Verified
7.9
662
|
Verified
8.0
10
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Digital Asset Management
7.0
69
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
8.8
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
14
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
16
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
17
|
Verified
Design
Not enough data
5.3
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.5
14
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.3
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
18
|
Verified
Platform
Not enough data
8.5
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
16
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
15
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
15
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Web Content Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design & Development
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Experience Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Sourcing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.7
39
8.7
5
8.2
29
Not enough data
8.7
34
Not enough data
9.1
36
Not enough data
8.8
31
Not enough data
8.6
29
Not enough data
9.4
41
8.3
5
Optimization
8.8
37
Not enough data
8.3
36
Not enough data
8.4
27
9.2
6
Analytics
8.3
32
Not enough data
7.6
23
Not enough data
8.7
36
Not enough data
Publishing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Headless CMS
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Headless Commerce
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - E-Commerce Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Merchandising/Marketing
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
7.2
10
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
9.2
10
Product Catalog
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
10
Order Process
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Multi-Channel Support
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.0
10
Platform
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Editing
6.5
117
Not enough data
8.0
124
Not enough data
5.7
113
Not enough data
6.8
111
Not enough data
Search
8.2
126
Not enough data
7.9
119
Not enough data
6.9
128
Not enough data
7.1
118
Not enough data
Permissions
8.3
124
Not enough data
8.5
125
Not enough data
8.4
121
Not enough data
Platform
8.1
119
Not enough data
8.4
122
Not enough data
7.4
118
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Brand Asset Management
5.8
24
Not enough data
5.9
24
Not enough data
6.1
25
Not enough data
6.1
24
Not enough data
6.0
24
Not enough data
6.0
24
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canto and Pimcore are categorized as Digital Asset Management and Product Information Management (PIM)
Unique Categories
Canto is categorized as Brand Asset Management
Pimcore is categorized as Customer Data Platform (CDP), Master Data Management (MDM), Digital Experience Platforms (DXP), Web Content Management, Headless CMS, E-Commerce Platforms, and Data Mapping
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canto
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Pimcore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
9.2%
Non-Profit Organization Management
7.9%
Higher Education
7.5%
Consumer Goods
6.5%
Retail
4.8%
Other
64.0%
Information Technology and Services
35.9%
Sporting Goods
5.1%
Financial Services
5.1%
Automotive
2.6%
Chemicals
2.6%
Other
48.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Can you add a feature to compose a presentation in deck format or even a reel?
1 Comment
KM
Thanks for the suggestion, Camilo. I'll take this to the team!Read more
Will canto provide an option to connect social media
1 Comment
CO
You are currently able to share to an array of social media outlets directly from Canto (Twitter, Facebook, etc.).Read more
What is the best file structure and tagging structure?
1 Comment
CK
You can use whatever structure you’d like. You can even import your current file structure directly (from server, for example). However, with DAM systems,...Read more
Describe who the software is best for, their role(s) within what kind of companies?
1 Comment
Official Response from Pimcore
Pimcore is best for CMOs, Senior Marketing Leaders, CTOs, Senior Technical Leaders and Senior Sales Leaders of Retail, Manufacturing, Travel and B2B companies.Read more
Who are Pimcore biggest competitors?
1 Comment
Official Response from Pimcore
Pimcore competitiors:
• Akeneo
• Salsify
• InRiver
• Riversand
• AdobeRead more
What kind of Pimcore features can customers expect to see in the near future?
1 Comment
Official Response from Pimcore
In the near future product enhancements will be in data management and experience management. In areas such as cloud hosting and data integration...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
