Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Canto and Pimberly SaaS PIM & DAM 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.9% of reviews)
Mid-Market (55.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
$36,000.00 50000 SKUs Per Year
Canto
Star Rating
(1,690)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Learn more about CantoPimberly SaaS PIM & DAM
Star Rating
(195)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$36,000.00 50000 SKUs Per Year
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Canto excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to Pimberly SaaS PIM & DAM. Users appreciate Canto's easy navigation and AI integration, which streamline workflows and enhance productivity.
- According to verified reviews, Canto's implementation process is praised for its intuitive onboarding, making it easier for teams to get started quickly. In contrast, Pimberly users have noted some challenges with setup, although they find the system intuitive and easy to use once established.
- Users say that Canto's search and sorting features are particularly effective, helping them avoid issues with misplaced documents. This capability is highlighted as a major advantage over Pimberly, where users have expressed a desire for improved search functionalities.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms offer strong customer support, but Canto's support quality is rated slightly higher. Users of Canto appreciate the quick responses and helpful guidance, while Pimberly users commend their top-notch customer service but note that they sometimes require more detailed assistance.
- According to recent feedback, Canto's digital asset management capabilities are robust, with users highlighting features like version control and file previews that enhance their workflow. Pimberly also offers useful features, such as the ability to manage multiple pricing structures, but users feel that Canto provides a more comprehensive solution for digital asset management.
- G2 reviewers indicate that while Pimberly shines in handling complex workflows, Canto's overall user experience is more favorable, with users noting that it allows them to manage branding and marketing content without the hassle of missing important documents. This ease of use is a significant factor for teams looking to streamline their operations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canto
Canto Digital Asset Management
Contact Us
Canto's platform, supported by a flexible and transparent pricing structure, caters to a diverse array of industries. It empowers companies ranging from teams of 50 employees to global enterprises to fuel their content delivery, maximizing their ROI.
- Increase content ROI
- Go to market faster
- Improve efficiency and streamline collaboration
Pimberly SaaS PIM & DAM
Regular
$36,000.00
50000 SKUs Per Year
The world's most powerful Enterprise SaaS PIM/DAM solution for brands, manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, and retailers.
- 50,000 SKUs
- 20 Users
- Integrated DAM
Free Trial
Canto
No trial information availablePimberly SaaS PIM & DAM
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
1,472
8.6
184
Ease of Use
8.7
1,484
8.4
185
Ease of Setup
8.3
907
7.8
145
Ease of Admin
8.7
858
8.5
78
Quality of Support
9.1
1,269
9.1
180
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
842
9.1
78
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
1,434
9.4
183
Features by Category
Interface and Performance
8.6
1235
|
Verified
8.5
88
8.5
1251
|
Verified
7.9
82
8.6
1267
|
Verified
7.6
85
8.5
1244
|
Verified
7.9
80
7.7
507
7.3
79
Asset Management
9.0
1211
|
Verified
8.7
83
8.8
1084
|
Verified
8.0
79
8.4
951
|
Verified
7.6
77
8.4
894
|
Verified
7.8
80
8.7
886
|
Verified
7.6
78
8.2
716
|
Verified
6.6
75
8.6
799
|
Verified
7.2
77
8.5
560
7.7
77
Media Types
8.6
1049
|
Verified
7.2
78
8.6
793
|
Verified
6.8
74
9.4
1254
|
Verified
8.5
85
Administration
8.2
703
|
Verified
8.4
83
8.7
1117
|
Verified
8.3
84
8.7
1067
|
Verified
7.7
78
7.9
749
|
Verified
7.2
78
7.9
659
|
Verified
7.4
78
Agentic AI - Digital Asset Management
7.1
66
6.9
12
Data Management
8.7
39
8.0
152
8.2
29
7.6
150
8.7
34
8.1
152
9.1
36
8.1
149
8.8
31
7.7
147
8.6
29
8.0
147
9.4
41
7.9
155
Optimization
8.8
37
8.3
150
8.3
36
8.4
153
8.4
27
7.8
146
Analytics
8.3
32
7.8
143
7.6
23
7.2
145
8.7
36
7.7
150
Editing
6.5
116
Not enough data
7.9
121
Not enough data
5.7
113
Not enough data
6.8
111
Not enough data
Search
8.2
126
Not enough data
7.9
119
Not enough data
6.9
126
Not enough data
7.1
118
Not enough data
Permissions
8.3
123
Not enough data
8.5
123
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
Platform
8.1
118
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
7.4
118
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Brand Asset Management
5.8
24
Not enough data
5.9
24
Not enough data
6.1
25
Not enough data
6.1
24
Not enough data
6.0
24
Not enough data
6.0
24
Not enough data
Data management - Catalog Management
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
9.0
29
Product catalogs - Catalog Management
Not enough data
8.8
30
Not enough data
8.0
29
Not enough data
7.7
26
Integration - Catalog Management
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.0
26
Analytics and Reporting - Catalog Management
Not enough data
8.2
26
Not enough data
7.5
26
Agentic AI - Catalog Management
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
5.8
8
Not enough data
6.9
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canto and Pimberly SaaS PIM & DAM are categorized as Digital Asset Management and Product Information Management (PIM)
Unique Categories
Canto is categorized as Brand Asset Management
Pimberly SaaS PIM & DAM is categorized as Catalog Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canto
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Pimberly SaaS PIM & DAM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Marketing and Advertising
9.3%
Non-Profit Organization Management
7.8%
Higher Education
7.2%
Consumer Goods
6.6%
Retail
4.9%
Other
64.1%
Retail
23.9%
Apparel & Fashion
12.8%
Wholesale
6.9%
Building Materials
6.4%
Manufacturing
5.9%
Other
44.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Can you add a feature to compose a presentation in deck format or even a reel?
1 Comment
KM
Thanks for the suggestion, Camilo. I'll take this to the team!Read more
Will canto provide an option to connect social media
1 Comment
CO
You are currently able to share to an array of social media outlets directly from Canto (Twitter, Facebook, etc.).Read more
What is the best file structure and tagging structure?
1 Comment
CK
You can use whatever structure you’d like. You can even import your current file structure directly (from server, for example). However, with DAM systems,...Read more
Pimberly SaaS PIM & DAM has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
