Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Canonical MicroK8s and Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Canonical MicroK8s
Star Rating
(17)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Canonical MicroK8sRed Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
Star Rating
(15)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes EngineSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Canonical MicroK8s excels in ease of use with a score of 9.5, making it particularly appealing for small businesses looking for a straightforward Kubernetes solution. In contrast, Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine has a lower ease of use rating at 8.5, which some users find less intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that Canonical MicroK8s offers impressive deployment capabilities with a score of 9.6, allowing for rapid application deployment. On the other hand, Red Hat OpenShift's deployment features, while robust, do not match this level of efficiency, leading to some frustration among users.
- G2 users highlight the self-healing high availability feature of Canonical MicroK8s, scoring it at 8.7, which ensures that applications remain operational even during failures. Conversely, Red Hat OpenShift's self-healing capabilities are perceived as less effective, with a lower score, which can impact reliability in critical environments.
- Reviewers mention that Canonical MicroK8s provides automatic security updates with a score of 9.0, which is a significant advantage for users concerned about maintaining security without manual intervention. In contrast, Red Hat OpenShift's security updates score lower at 8.7, leading some users to express concerns about the frequency and management of updates.
- Users on G2 report that Canonical MicroK8s shines in scalability with a score of 9.2, making it suitable for growing businesses that need to expand their applications quickly. Red Hat OpenShift, while scalable, does not receive the same level of praise, with users noting that scaling can be more complex and less seamless.
- Reviewers mention that Canonical MicroK8s has a strong product direction with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating a clear roadmap and commitment to future enhancements. In contrast, Red Hat OpenShift's product direction score of 9.0, while still positive, suggests that some users are less confident in the future trajectory of the platform.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canonical MicroK8s
No pricing availableRed Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
No pricing availableFree Trial
Canonical MicroK8s
No trial information availableRed Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
10
8.6
11
Ease of Use
9.5
10
8.5
14
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.2
8
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.3
6
Quality of Support
8.3
8
8.8
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.6
6
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
7
9.0
12
Features by Category
Application Support
Not enough data
9.6
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.7
9
System Capability
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Security
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.7
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canonical MicroK8s and Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine are categorized as Container Engine
Unique Categories
Canonical MicroK8s has no unique categories
Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canonical MicroK8s
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
47.1%
Information Technology and Services
23.5%
Financial Services
11.8%
Telecommunications
5.9%
Education Management
5.9%
Other
5.9%
Computer Software
26.7%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Banking
13.3%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Retail
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Canonical MicroK8s has no discussions with answers
Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
