- Home
- ...
- Container Management Software
- Canonical LXD
- Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
- Canonical LXD-vs-Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
Compare Canonical LXD and Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine 
Canonical LXD vs Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine easier to use and set up. However, reviewers felt that administration of both products was equally easy, and preferred doing business with Canonical LXD overall.
- Reviewers felt that Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine meets the needs of their business better than Canonical LXD.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Canonical LXD over Red Hat OpenShift Kubernetes Engine.
LXD provides support for system containers and virtual machines. When running a system container, LXD simulates a virtual version of an entire operating system. To do this, it uses the functionality provided by the kernel running on the host...
It is very easy to configure and use. Containers are supported natively but the ease of orchestration and management of the containers through RedHat OpenShift Kubernetes are far more delighted.
LXD provides support for system containers and virtual machines. When running a system container, LXD simulates a virtual version of an entire operating system. To do this, it uses the functionality provided by the kernel running on the host...
It is very easy to configure and use. Containers are supported natively but the ease of orchestration and management of the containers through RedHat OpenShift Kubernetes are far more delighted.
