Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Canonical Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Canonical Kubernetes
Canonical Kubernetes
Star Rating
(28)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Canonical Kubernetes
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Star Rating
(303)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShift
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that Red Hat OpenShift excels in user experience, particularly due to its intuitive dashboard that consolidates essential functions, making orchestration tasks significantly easier. In contrast, while Canonical Kubernetes is noted for its ease of installation on Ubuntu, users find it less comprehensive in terms of integrated features.
  • Users say that Red Hat OpenShift provides a more cohesive platform, effectively reducing the chaos often associated with Kubernetes environments. They appreciate how it bundles everything into one clean interface, which streamlines the path from code to production. Canonical Kubernetes, while praised for its auto-scaling capabilities, lacks this level of integration.
  • Reviewers mention that Red Hat OpenShift's implementation process is quick and user-friendly, with many highlighting its seamless support for containerization and deployment pipelines. On the other hand, Canonical Kubernetes users appreciate its flexibility in managing clusters but may face challenges in achieving the same level of support and ease during setup.
  • According to verified reviews, Red Hat OpenShift scores higher in overall satisfaction metrics, reflecting a more positive user experience. Users frequently commend its quality of support, which is crucial for enterprise environments. In comparison, while Canonical Kubernetes has a solid support rating, it does not match the extensive resources available for OpenShift users.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that Red Hat OpenShift is particularly favored in enterprise settings, with nearly half of its reviews coming from larger organizations. This contrasts with Canonical Kubernetes, which is more popular among small businesses, indicating that OpenShift may better meet the needs of larger teams requiring robust orchestration solutions.
  • Users report that while both platforms offer strong orchestration capabilities, Red Hat OpenShift's developer toolkit is more comprehensive, enhancing productivity for development teams. Canonical Kubernetes, while effective, is seen as less feature-rich in this area, which may impact developers looking for advanced tools.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canonical Kubernetes
No pricing available
Red Hat OpenShift
No pricing available
Free Trial
Canonical Kubernetes
No trial information available
Red Hat OpenShift
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
12
8.7
83
Ease of Use
8.5
12
8.2
226
Ease of Setup
8.1
9
7.8
193
Ease of Admin
8.3
9
8.6
57
Quality of Support
8.2
11
8.4
73
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
8
8.6
53
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
11
9.0
80
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.8
6
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Automation
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
8.8
27
Development
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.1
18
Not enough data
9.2
16
Database
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.2
24
8.5
9
8.7
39
Management
8.0
9
8.5
32
8.5
9
8.4
31
8.5
9
8.2
30
Organization
8.1
9
8.5
32
8.7
9
8.9
33
9.1
9
9.1
31
Development
7.6
9
8.5
27
8.5
9
8.8
30
9.0
8
8.6
25
8.7
9
9.2
26
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canonical Kubernetes
Canonical Kubernetes
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Canonical Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift are categorized as Container Orchestration and Container Management
Unique Categories
Canonical Kubernetes
Canonical Kubernetes has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canonical Kubernetes
Canonical Kubernetes
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
39.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
28.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
32.1%
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
27.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
49.1%
Reviewers' Industry
Canonical Kubernetes
Canonical Kubernetes
Information Technology and Services
21.4%
Computer Software
14.3%
Banking
10.7%
Logistics and Supply Chain
7.1%
Design
7.1%
Other
39.3%
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Information Technology and Services
15.5%
Financial Services
13.8%
Banking
9.2%
Computer Software
8.5%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Other
45.9%
Alternatives
Canonical Kubernetes
Canonical Kubernetes Alternatives
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Add DigitalOcean
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
Add Akamai Cloud Computing
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Add VMware vSphere
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Mirantis
Add Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift Alternatives
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Add VMware vSphere
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Mirantis
Add Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Add Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Kubernetes Engine
Add Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Discussions
Canonical Kubernetes
Canonical Kubernetes Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Canonical Kubernetes has no discussions with answers
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift Discussions
What is included in Red Hat OpenShift container platform?
1 Comment
Narayanaswamy G.
NG
you can deploy your applications and have UI which is more superior to Kubernetes. operator development, etc.. all features of k8s are present in OCP.Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Red Hat OpenShift has no more discussions with answers