Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Candidate Labs and SecureVision

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Candidate Labs
Candidate Labs
Star Rating
(296)5.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Candidate Labs
SecureVision
SecureVision
Star Rating
(496)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (67.1% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SecureVision
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that SecureVision excels in resource allocation, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, while Candidate Labs scored slightly lower at 10.0. Reviewers mention that SecureVision's team effectively utilizes resources, leading to more efficient project execution.
  • Reviewers say that both products have strong technical expertise, scoring 9.9 each. However, users on G2 highlight that SecureVision's team is particularly adept at integrating with existing systems, which enhances overall functionality.
  • Users say that SecureVision consistently meets deadlines with a perfect score of 10.0, while Candidate Labs scored 9.9. Reviewers mention that SecureVision's project management tools, such as their timeline tracking feature, contribute significantly to their reliability in meeting project timelines.
  • Reviewers mention that Candidate Labs shines in change management skills, scoring 9.8, compared to SecureVision's 9.9. Users report that Candidate Labs provides more comprehensive training resources, which helps teams adapt to changes more smoothly.
  • G2 users highlight that SecureVision's communication skills are exceptional, with a score of 9.9, matching Candidate Labs. However, users report that SecureVision's regular project updates feature is particularly praised for keeping stakeholders informed throughout the project lifecycle.
  • Users on G2 mention that while both products have strong vertical expertise, SecureVision's partnerships with technology providers scored a perfect 10.0, indicating a broader range of integrations that enhance its functionality compared to Candidate Labs' score of 9.9.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Candidate Labs
No pricing available
SecureVision
No pricing available
Free Trial
Candidate Labs
No trial information available
SecureVision
No trial information available
Ratings
Quality of Work
9.9
196
9.8
404
Responsiveness
9.9
199
9.9
406
Expertise of Team
9.9
193
9.8
398
Execution Ability
9.9
192
9.8
381
Communication Skills
9.9
198
9.9
406
Professionalism
9.9
200
9.9
412
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.9
237
9.8
382
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Planning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Team Quality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Candidate Labs
Candidate Labs
SecureVision
SecureVision
Candidate Labs and SecureVision are categorized as Recruitment Agencies and Staffing Agencies
Unique Categories
Candidate Labs
Candidate Labs has no unique categories
SecureVision
SecureVision is categorized as Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Candidate Labs
Candidate Labs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
64.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
31.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
4.1%
SecureVision
SecureVision
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
67.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
28.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
4.4%
Reviewers' Industry
Candidate Labs
Candidate Labs
Computer Software
47.6%
Information Technology and Services
23.3%
Marketing and Advertising
4.1%
Financial Services
3.7%
Internet
3.0%
Other
18.2%
SecureVision
SecureVision
Computer Software
24.0%
Information Technology and Services
21.6%
Marketing and Advertising
14.1%
Real Estate
5.2%
Computer & Network Security
4.4%
Other
30.6%
Alternatives
Candidate Labs
Candidate Labs Alternatives
Hirewell
Hirewell
Add Hirewell
Victory Lap
Victory Lap
Add Victory Lap
memoryBlue
memoryBlue
Add memoryBlue
Sales Talent Inc.
Sales Talent Inc.
Add Sales Talent Inc.
SecureVision
SecureVision Alternatives
Hirewell
Hirewell
Add Hirewell
memoryBlue
memoryBlue
Add memoryBlue
Sales Talent Inc.
Sales Talent Inc.
Add Sales Talent Inc.
Lucas James Talent Partners
Lucas James Talent Partners
Add Lucas James Talent Partners