Users report that StackPath CDN has a solid entry-level price of $15 per month, making it accessible for small businesses, while CacheFly, although more expensive, offers a higher overall G2 rating of 4.5, indicating a stronger user satisfaction.
Reviewers mention that StackPath CDN excels in static content caching with a score of 8.6, but CacheFly outshines it with a score of 9.4, highlighting its superior performance in delivering cached content quickly and efficiently.
G2 users indicate that CacheFly's dynamic content routing is rated at 9.7, significantly higher than StackPath's 8.4, suggesting that CacheFly provides a more effective solution for handling dynamic content requests.
Users on G2 report that CacheFly's cache purging feature is exceptional, scoring 9.9, while StackPath's score of 7.9 indicates that users find its cache purging capabilities less efficient, which can impact content updates.
Reviewers mention that the quality of support for CacheFly is rated at 9.6, compared to StackPath's 8.2, suggesting that users feel more supported and valued with CacheFly, especially when issues arise.
Users say that CacheFly's dashboard and reporting features are rated at 9.4, significantly higher than StackPath's 8.3 and 7.4 respectively, indicating that CacheFly provides a more user-friendly and insightful management experience.
Hi Madison,
Thanks for the great question. Every CacheFly account comes with it's own storage attached to it, and the ability to FTP content into that...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.