Join the 1500 companies using G2 Track to manage SaaS spend, usage, contracts & compliance.
Compare CA PPM, Micro Focus PPM, Rukovoditel, and Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management

Pricing

 
Standard Part
$0
No Restrictions
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
 
Extension
$95
No Restrictions
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
 
Project Online Premium
$55
/User/Month
 
Project Online Professional
$30
/User/Month
 
Project Online Essentials
$7
/User/Month
 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
CA PPM
Free Trial Unavailable
Micro Focus PPM
Free Trial Unavailable
Rukovoditel
Standard Part
$0No Restrictions
Extension
$95No Restrictions
Free Trial Unavailable
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
Project Online Premium
$55/User/Month
Project Online Professional
$30/User/Month
Project Online Essentials
$7/User/Month
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
7.6
8.3
9.2
8.3
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
6.6
6.8
9.2
7.2
Ease of Setup
Ease of Setup
5.6
7.7
9.2
7.5
Ease of Admin
Ease of Admin
6.4
8.4
8.8
7.6
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
6.4
7.2
9.4
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business With
7.6
8.0
Not enough data available
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
5.6
6.7
9.3
6.5
Meets Requirements
CA PPM
7.6
Micro Focus PPM
8.3
Rukovoditel
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Ease of Use
CA PPM
6.6
Micro Focus PPM
6.8
Rukovoditel
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.2
Ease of Setup
CA PPM
5.6
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Admin
CA PPM
6.4
Micro Focus PPM
8.4
Rukovoditel
8.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Quality of Support
CA PPM
6.4
Micro Focus PPM
7.2
Rukovoditel
9.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
CA PPM
7.6
Micro Focus PPM
8.0
Rukovoditel
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
CA PPM
5.6
Micro Focus PPM
6.7
Rukovoditel
9.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
6.5

Features

Tasks
Task Creation and Assignment
CA PPM
7.8
Micro Focus PPM
7.9
Rukovoditel
9.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.4
Due Dates
CA PPM
7.8
Micro Focus PPM
8.1
Rukovoditel
9.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.5
Task Prioritization
CA PPM
7.4
Micro Focus PPM
7.8
Rukovoditel
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.2
To-Do Lists
CA PPM
7.2
Micro Focus PPM
7.2
Rukovoditel
8.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Collaboration
Collaborative Project Planning
CA PPM
7.2
Micro Focus PPM
7.6
Rukovoditel
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Comments
CA PPM
6.7
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
9.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Documents and Uploads
CA PPM
7.4
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
8.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Projects
Gantt Chart / Project Map
CA PPM
7.3
Micro Focus PPM
7.8
Rukovoditel
8.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.6
Calendar View
CA PPM
7.2
Micro Focus PPM
7.5
Rukovoditel
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Baselining / KPIs
CA PPM
7.4
Micro Focus PPM
7.1
Rukovoditel
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Project Budgeting
CA PPM
7.4
Micro Focus PPM
8.2
Rukovoditel
8.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Issue Tracking
CA PPM
6.7
Micro Focus PPM
8.2
Rukovoditel
9.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Coordination
CA PPM
7.8
Micro Focus PPM
7.9
Rukovoditel
9.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Portfolio Budgeting
CA PPM
7.4
Micro Focus PPM
7.8
Rukovoditel
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
What-If Scenarios
CA PPM
7.3
Micro Focus PPM
7.4
Rukovoditel
9.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Workflow
CA PPM
6.7
Micro Focus PPM
8.1
Rukovoditel
9.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Request Management
CA PPM
7.1
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
9.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Cost Tracking
CA PPM
7.3
Micro Focus PPM
7.6
Rukovoditel
9.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
ROI and Forecasting
CA PPM
7.0
Micro Focus PPM
7.2
Rukovoditel
9.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Risk Analysis
CA PPM
7.3
Micro Focus PPM
7.9
Rukovoditel
9.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Resource Management
Resource Database
CA PPM
7.9
Micro Focus PPM
8.1
Rukovoditel
9.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Resource Allocation
CA PPM
7.5
Micro Focus PPM
7.4
Rukovoditel
9.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Workload Capacity
CA PPM
7.6
Micro Focus PPM
8.0
Rukovoditel
9.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Time Tracking
CA PPM
8.1
Micro Focus PPM
8.3
Rukovoditel
9.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Platform
Alerts
CA PPM
7.0
Micro Focus PPM
8.0
Rukovoditel
8.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Mobile
CA PPM
5.8
Micro Focus PPM
5.6
Rukovoditel
8.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.0
User, Role, and Access Management
CA PPM
7.1
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
9.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
API / Integrations
CA PPM
6.3
Micro Focus PPM
6.8
Rukovoditel
9.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Reporting and Dashboards
CA PPM
7.6
Micro Focus PPM
7.5
Rukovoditel
8.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Customization
CA PPM
7.3
Micro Focus PPM
7.4
Rukovoditel
9.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Performance and Reliability
CA PPM
7.4
Micro Focus PPM
7.7
Rukovoditel
9.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
0%
9.5%
31.3%
24.7%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
26.8%
28.6%
50.0%
27.2%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
73.2%
61.9%
18.8%
48.1%
CA PPM
Small-Business
0%
Mid-Market
26.8%
Enterprise
73.2%
Micro Focus PPM
Small-Business
9.5%
Mid-Market
28.6%
Enterprise
61.9%
Rukovoditel
Small-Business
31.3%
Mid-Market
50.0%
Enterprise
18.8%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Small-Business
24.7%
Mid-Market
27.2%
Enterprise
48.1%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Information Technology and Services
34.6%
Restaurants
10.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
 
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
Telecommunications
11.5%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
 
Insurance
13.2%
Management Consulting
7.7%
Food & Beverages
10.0%
Higher Education
5.0%
 
Telecommunications
7.5%
Insurance
7.7%
Computer Software
10.0%
Construction
4.7%
 
Accounting
7.5%
Non-Profit Organization Management
3.8%
Computer Hardware
10.0%
Computer Software
4.4%
 
Other
35.8%
Other
34.6%
Other
50.0%
Other
66.0%
CA PPM
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Hospital & Health Care
17.0%
Insurance
13.2%
Telecommunications
7.5%
Accounting
7.5%
Other
35.8%
Micro Focus PPM
Information Technology and Services
34.6%
Telecommunications
11.5%
Management Consulting
7.7%
Insurance
7.7%
Non-Profit Organization Management
3.8%
Other
34.6%
Rukovoditel
Restaurants
10.0%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Food & Beverages
10.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Computer Hardware
10.0%
Other
50.0%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
Higher Education
5.0%
Construction
4.7%
Computer Software
4.4%
Other
66.0%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

Peter B.
User in Computer Software

I evaluated and ran a trial of this software a few years ago and it basically was a good tool for large IT shops that need to keep track of all their projects in one central repository.

Thomas G.
Consultant in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad

First off, Rukovoditel is a very flexible and easy to use PMS. Once you are set up, you will be able to create projects, tasks and tickets and assign them to anyone in your team, as well as attach files and a range of other useful things. But what really...

John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
Tiberius F.
User in Automotive

My dislikes are: User driven customization of the product is not fully supported by Clarity PPM. CA PPM only allows data extraction to third party software and does not support full integration. No social collaboration features

G2 User in Hospital & Health Care

I am a basic user of the system and therefore can only review the application from that standpoint. With this in mind, as a user, I think the application is rather cumbersome. If you add more than a handful of tasks / assets / miscellaneous items to your...

Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

 
CA PPM
Most Helpful Favorable Review
James P.
Consultant in Information Technology and Services

My favorite part of Clarity is how easily you can configure the application as an end user. You can easily save different filters and views to display specific data each time the application is launched. Additionally, back end administrators can easily...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Tiberius F.
User in Automotive

My dislikes are: User driven customization of the product is not fully supported by Clarity PPM. CA PPM only allows data extraction to third party software and does not support full integration. No social collaboration features

Micro Focus PPM
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Peter B.
User in Computer Software

I evaluated and ran a trial of this software a few years ago and it basically was a good tool for large IT shops that need to keep track of all their projects in one central repository.

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User in Hospital & Health Care

I am a basic user of the system and therefore can only review the application from that standpoint. With this in mind, as a user, I think the application is rather cumbersome. If you add more than a handful of tasks / assets / miscellaneous items to your...

Rukovoditel
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Thomas G.
Consultant in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad

First off, Rukovoditel is a very flexible and easy to use PMS. Once you are set up, you will be able to create projects, tasks and tickets and assign them to anyone in your team, as well as attach files and a range of other useful things. But what really...

Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

Screenshots

 
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
1 of 6
2 of 6
3 of 6
4 of 6
5 of 6
6 of 6
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
Micro Focus PPM
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Ask CA PPM a QuestionContact CA PPMAsk Micro Focus PPM a QuestionContact Micro Focus PPMAsk Rukovoditel a QuestionContact RukovoditelRequest More InformationRequest More Information