Users report that C++Builder has a lower ease of use rating (6.9) compared to RAD Studio (9.0), indicating that RAD Studio may be more intuitive for new users.
Reviewers mention that C++Builder's file management capabilities (6.9) fall short of RAD Studio's (8.3), with RAD Studio providing a more streamlined experience for organizing and accessing files.
G2 users highlight that RAD Studio excels in multi-language support (8.1), while C++Builder's rating (7.7) suggests it may not cater as effectively to developers working in diverse programming environments.
Users on G2 say that RAD Studio offers superior straight-out-the-box functionality (9.0), making it easier for users to start projects without extensive setup, unlike C++Builder (7.0), which may require more initial configuration.
Reviewers mention that RAD Studio's help guides (8.3) are more comprehensive and user-friendly compared to C++Builder's (6.7), which can be a significant factor for users seeking assistance during development.
Users report that while C++Builder has a decent patching and updates rating (7.5), RAD Studio's lower score (6.5) indicates that users may experience more challenges with updates and maintenance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
C++Builder
No pricing available
RAD Studio
No pricing available
Free Trial
C++Builder
Free Trial is available
RAD Studio
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
17
8.8
11
Ease of Use
7.7
17
8.5
10
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.0
16
8.9
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.