Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare C++Builder and Qt 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
DocSheets
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Visure Requirements
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Opti Digital
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (52.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
C++Builder
Star Rating
(18)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (52.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Browse all 4 pricing plansQt
Star Rating
(53)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QtSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that C++Builder has a steeper learning curve compared to Qt, with a usability score of 6.9, while Qt shines with an ease of use score of 9.0, making it more accessible for beginners.
- Reviewers mention that C++Builder's file management capabilities are rated at 6.9, which some users find limiting, whereas Qt offers a more robust file management system with a score of 7.7, enhancing user experience.
- G2 users highlight that C++Builder's multi-language support is rated at 7.7, which is decent, but Qt excels with a score of 8.3, making it a better choice for projects requiring extensive language support.
- Users on G2 report that C++Builder's customization options are rated at 7.5, which some find adequate, but Qt's customization score of 8.0 indicates a more flexible and user-friendly approach to tailoring applications.
- Reviewers say that C++Builder's help guides are rated at 6.7, which can be lacking, while Qt's help guides score 8.3, providing users with better resources and support for troubleshooting and learning.
- Users mention that C++Builder's patching and updates score is 7.5, which is satisfactory, but Qt's score of 7.7 suggests a more proactive approach to maintaining software performance and security.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
C++Builder
No pricing availableQt
No pricing availableFree Trial
C++Builder
Free Trial is available
Qt
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
17
8.5
45
Ease of Use
7.7
17
8.4
45
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.5
13
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.3
11
Quality of Support
7.0
16
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.8
10
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
16
8.2
45
Features by Category
Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
6.9
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
6.7
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Platform - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advertising - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
C++Builder and Qt are categorized as C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE) and Application Development Platforms
Unique Categories
C++Builder has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
C++Builder
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
29.4%
Information Technology and Services
11.8%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.9%
Telecommunications
5.9%
Information Services
5.9%
Other
41.2%
Computer Software
28.8%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Telecommunications
5.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.8%
Higher Education
5.8%
Other
46.2%
Discussions
C++Builder has no discussions with answers
What are the primary benefits of QtCreator?
1 Comment
LR
QtCreator has many benefits:
+ It is stable mature software being continuously developed and maintained following best practices since 1995.
+ It has...Read more
What is the use of Qt Creator?
1 Comment
SP
It’s a multi-platform Développement IDE available for windows, Linux, macOS, android and others.Read more
Is Qt Creator IDE free?
1 Comment
SP
QT Creator is the development IDE, you can use the IDE however the QT libraries are only free for open source development which means if you use the open...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
