Compare Bynder Webdam and Canto 
Bynder Webdam vs Canto
- Users report that Canto excels in its search functionality with a score of 8.6, while Bynder Webdam falls short with a score of 7.6. Reviewers mention that Canto's advanced filtering options make it easier to locate assets quickly.
- Reviewers mention that Canto's quality of support is notably higher, scoring 8.8 compared to Bynder Webdam's 8.0. Users on G2 appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of Canto's support team.
- Users say that Canto offers a more user-friendly organizational interface with a score of 8.2, while Bynder Webdam scores 7.9. Reviewers highlight that Canto's layout is intuitive, making navigation seamless.
- G2 users report that Canto's photo editing capabilities are limited, scoring only 6.4, whereas Bynder Webdam does not provide a specific score but is noted for better integration with editing tools, which some users find beneficial.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms score equally on content expiration at 8.6, but users on G2 feel that Canto's implementation is more straightforward, making it easier to manage asset lifecycles.
- Users report that Canto shines in asset permissions with a score of 8.3, compared to Bynder Webdam's 8.2. Reviewers appreciate Canto's granular control over user access, which enhances security and compliance.
- Increase content ROI
- Go to market faster
- Improve efficiency and streamline collaboration
Ease of use! webDAM has all of the functionality necessary to manage all of our digital assets. It is easy to use so we have not had problems with our end users or our internal team learning to use it. I also really like the formatting functionality when...
Cursor is not already in the user name box when you open the login page. Sometimes some of the photo thumbnails don't show up. Photos take a long time to process after uploading. The Watermark is hard to change.
We researched a number of DAMS before choosing Flight, but all of them seemed too focused on how large businesses might need to manage their assets. They were feature rich, but these features came with a price tag. As a small non-profit, we didn't want to...
Upload speeds and user interface are terrible. Price is extremely high for amount of storage given.
Ease of use! webDAM has all of the functionality necessary to manage all of our digital assets. It is easy to use so we have not had problems with our end users or our internal team learning to use it. I also really like the formatting functionality when...
We researched a number of DAMS before choosing Flight, but all of them seemed too focused on how large businesses might need to manage their assets. They were feature rich, but these features came with a price tag. As a small non-profit, we didn't want to...
Cursor is not already in the user name box when you open the login page. Sometimes some of the photo thumbnails don't show up. Photos take a long time to process after uploading. The Watermark is hard to change.
Upload speeds and user interface are terrible. Price is extremely high for amount of storage given.
