Link copied to clipboard # Burp Suite vs Qualys WAS Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/burp-suite/qualys-was/export.csv) Burp SuiteQualys WAS[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Burp Suite** **$475.00** 1 User Per Year · Burp Suite Professional **Contact Us** Per Year · Burp Suite DAST **Qualys WAS** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **Burp Suite** $$$$$ **Qualys WAS** Not enough reviews yet Average Discount **Burp Suite** Not enough reviews yet **Qualys WAS** Not enough reviews yet Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **Burp Suite** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Qualys WAS** 6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **Burp Suite** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Qualys WAS** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Burp Suite** Ease of Use (12) User Interface (8) Expensive (5) Slow Performance (5) **Qualys WAS** Not enough data Integrations **Burp Suite** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_1eff145289f3ee8649ba9d287a4fc68a/gitlab.jpeg "Product Avatar Image") GitLab ](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_793034d14bb0f3fa12d97cf3cc0032c4/jira.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Jira ](https://www.g2.com/products/jira/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_c65522c8f7bacfdc0684fc8d26bba00d/mozilla-firefox.png "Product Avatar Image") Firefox ](https://www.g2.com/products/mozilla-firefox/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_fd527e1fc777d9e31b2a28e8d3c959a4/postman.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Postman ](https://www.g2.com/products/postman/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/integrations) **Qualys WAS** Not enough data **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Burp Suite** **9.4** /10 Based on 112 responses **Qualys WAS** **9.7** /10 Based on 15 responses Ease of Use **Burp Suite** **8.8** /10 Based on 115 responses **Qualys WAS** **9.3** /10 Based on 15 responses Ease of Setup **Burp Suite** **9.3** /10 Based on 50 responses **Qualys WAS** **10.0** /10 Based on 6 responses Ease of Admin **Burp Suite** **9.1** /10 Based on 29 responses **Qualys WAS** **10.0** /10 Based on 5 responses Quality of Support **Burp Suite** **8.6** /10 Based on 100 responses **Qualys WAS** **9.3** /10 Based on 15 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Burp Suite** **9.7** /10 Based on 27 responses **Qualys WAS** **9.7** /10 Based on 5 responses Product Direction (% positive) **Burp Suite** **9.2** /10 Based on 111 responses **Qualys WAS** **10.0** /10 Based on 13 responses **Features** ratings from reviews Vulnerability Scanner **8.1** /10 Based on 84 responses **8.2** /10 Based on 15 responses Penetration Testing **9.2** /10 Based on 26 responses Not enough data User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 33.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 39.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 27.1% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 33.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 39.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 27.1% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 20.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 50.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 30.0% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 20.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 50.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 30.0% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Burp Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1084a0792dcd7344d19c56aea015669c/burp-suite.svg "Burp Suite")](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) Burp Suite Computer & Network Security 28.0% Information Technology and Services 28.0% Computer Software 14.4% Financial Services 4.5% Retail 3.0% Other 22.0% [![Qualys WAS](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1539625325/qualys-was.png "Qualys WAS")](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-was/reviews) Qualys WAS Information Technology and Services 30.0% Computer Software 30.0% Computer & Network Security 20.0% Financial Services 10.0% Outsourcing/Offshoring 5.0% Other 5.0% Alternatives **Burp Suite Alternatives** ![Intruder](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1539808658/intruder.svg "Intruder") [ Intruder ](/products/intruder/reviews) ![Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8b9bbc1b8758727122569ca626a30959/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix.svg "Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)") [ Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix) ](/products/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix/reviews) ![Invicti](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3bee4d2b732dab5368b9a8aa21f05e30/invicti.svg "Invicti") [ Invicti ](/products/invicti/reviews) ![Veracode Application Security Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d30c215643c0b745ba4951ab20b60121/veracode-application-security-platform.svg "Veracode Application Security Platform") [ Veracode Application... ](/products/veracode-application-security-platform/reviews) **Qualys WAS Alternatives** ![Tenable Nessus](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/127e03b7d601741c15306f07b0f8cf84/tenable-nessus.svg "Tenable Nessus") [ Tenable Nessus ](/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) ![Wiz](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/991dbad301661dc9e1b78a7e252252b4/wiz-wiz.svg "Wiz") [ Wiz ](/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) ![Orca Security](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/7bfb8b139d34ddbb4c7f1c4dc8e7b029/orca-security.svg "Orca Security") [ Orca Security ](/products/orca-security/reviews) ![Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_7b1e34d1cfcc265beee0d9b4290461fa/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform.jpg "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform") [ Red Hat Ansible Automation... ](/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) ## Burp Suite vs Qualys WAS FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 14, 2026 ### What is the difference between Burp Suite vs Qualys WAS? Burp Suite stands out for its higher G2 rating and reviewer-cited strengths in extensibility and manual testing control, while Qualys WAS is favored for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive cloud-based scanning. | [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) | [Qualys WAS](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-was/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.8/5 (129 reviews) | 4.5/5 (20 reviews) | | — | — | | 9.3 | 10.0 | | 8.7 | 9.3 | | Extensive extension ecosystem and manual testing control | User-friendly interface and comprehensive cloud-based scanning | ### How do the pricing models of Burp Suite and Qualys WAS compare? Burp Suite is rated higher for price satisfaction, with reviewers consistently citing its value for penetration testers, while Qualys WAS is noted as expensive, especially for small organizations. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers describe the Professional license as justified for serious penetration testers, though the price is a barrier for individuals and small teams. - **Qualys WAS:** Reviewers frequently mention that Qualys WAS is expensive and cite cost as a barrier for small organizations, despite its robust feature set. ### What are the best alternatives to Burp Suite and Qualys WAS? The best alternatives to Burp Suite and Qualys WAS are Intruder, Acunetix by Invicti, and Tenable Nessus. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) | 4.8/5 (129 reviews) | Professional license seen as justified for penetration testers, but costly for individuals | Extensive extension ecosystem and manual testing control | | [Qualys WAS](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-was/reviews) | 4.5/5 (20 reviews) | Expensive, especially for small organizations | User-friendly interface and comprehensive cloud-based scanning | | [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews) | 4.8/5 (209 reviews) | — | — | | [Acunetix by Invicti](https://www.g2.com/products/acunetix-by-invicti/reviews) | 4.1/5 (105 reviews) | — | — | | [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) | 4.5/5 (305 reviews) | — | — | ### Which Vulnerability Scanner features should I prioritize when comparing Burp Suite and Qualys WAS? Buyers should prioritize extensibility, ease of use, integration capabilities, automated scanning, and false positive management when comparing Burp Suite and Qualys WAS. - **Extensibility:** Burp Suite is cited for its extensive extension ecosystem (5 all-time mentions), while Qualys WAS does not have reviewer-cited extensibility strengths. - **Ease of Use:** Burp Suite has 12 all-time mentions for ease of use; Qualys WAS is praised for its user-friendly interface in recent reviews. - **Integration Capabilities:** Burp Suite has 4 all-time mentions for integration capabilities and easy integrations; Qualys WAS does not have reviewer-cited integration strengths. - **Automated Scanning:** Burp Suite is mentioned for automated scanning (2 all-time mentions); Qualys WAS is cited for comprehensive automated and manual scanning options in recent reviews. - **False Positives:** Both products have reviewer feedback on false positives, with Burp Suite noted for improvements and Qualys WAS for occasional false positives in recent reviews. ### What are the pros and cons of Burp Suite vs Qualys WAS? Burp Suite's headline strength is its extensibility and manual testing control, while Qualys WAS is recognized for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive scanning. - **Burp Suite strengths:** Extensive extension ecosystem (5 all-time mentions), ease of use (12 all-time mentions), user interface (8 all-time mentions), integration capabilities (4 all-time mentions), and detailed vulnerability identification (4 all-time mentions). - **Burp Suite trade-offs:** Expensive (5 all-time mentions), slow performance (5 all-time mentions), high learning curve (2 all-time mentions), and limited customization (2 all-time mentions). - **Qualys WAS strengths:** User-friendly interface and comprehensive cloud-based scanning, cited in recent reviews. - **Qualys WAS trade-offs:** Expensive for small organizations, occasional false positives, and a learning curve for new users, as noted in recent reviews. ### Is Burp Suite or Qualys WAS better for small businesses? Burp Suite is a better fit for small businesses, as reflected in reviewer sentiment and its adoption among individual security professionals and small teams. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers highlight its value for penetration testers and small security teams, despite the price barrier for individuals. - **Qualys WAS:** Reviewers note that its pricing is a barrier for small organizations, making it less accessible for this segment. ### Which Vulnerability Scanner platform has better integrations? Burp Suite is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing its extension ecosystem and integration with tools like Postman. - **Burp Suite:** Integrates with Postman, with 2 all-time mentions, and is frequently cited for its extension ecosystem and integration capabilities (4 all-time mentions). - **Qualys WAS:** No reviewer-cited integrations are mentioned in recent reviews. ### How do Burp Suite and Qualys WAS compare on customer support? Qualys WAS scores higher on Quality of Support by 0.6 points, indicating a material advantage over Burp Suite. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers mention good support and documentation, with 2 all-time mentions for customer support and several positive comments about the Web Security Academy and community resources. - **Qualys WAS:** Reviewers consistently praise customer support, describing it as excellent and flawless in recent reviews, with a Quality of Support score of 9.3. ### Which is easier to implement, Burp Suite or Qualys WAS? Qualys WAS is easier to implement, with a 0.7-point higher Ease of Setup score than Burp Suite. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers describe setup as straightforward but note a learning curve for beginners and resource intensity on lower-end systems. - **Qualys WAS:** Reviewers highlight easy setup and onboarding, with a user-friendly interface and centralized management, and an Ease of Setup score of 10.0. ### Which product has better False Positives? Burp Suite is noted for improvements in false positive management, while Qualys WAS receives mixed feedback on false positives. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers mention fewer false positives in automated testing and ongoing improvements, with several citing the need for manual verification but noting progress in detection accuracy. - **Qualys WAS:** Reviewers report occasional false positives and note the inability to adjust detection quality, with some expressing a desire for more control over false positive rates. ## Burp Suite vs Qualys WAS When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Qualys WAS easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers felt that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall. - Reviewers felt that Qualys WAS meets the needs of their business better than Burp Suite. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Qualys WAS is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Qualys WAS over Burp Suite.