Link copied to clipboard # Burp Suite vs Indusface WAS Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/burp-suite/indusface-was/export.csv) Burp SuiteIndusface WAS[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Burp Suite** **$475.00** 1 User Per Year · Burp Suite Professional **Contact Us** Per Year · Burp Suite DAST **Indusface WAS** Free Trial **$59.00** · Advance Plan **Contact Us** · Premium Plan **Contact Us** · MSSP Edition **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **Burp Suite** $$$$$ **Indusface WAS** $$$$$ Average Discount **Burp Suite** Not enough reviews yet **Indusface WAS** Not enough reviews yet Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **Burp Suite** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Indusface WAS** 6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **Burp Suite** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Indusface WAS** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Burp Suite** Ease of Use (12) User Interface (8) Expensive (5) Slow Performance (5) **Indusface WAS** Vulnerability Detection (19) Vulnerability Identification (16) Expensive (2) Confusing Interface (1) Integrations **Burp Suite** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_1eff145289f3ee8649ba9d287a4fc68a/gitlab.jpeg "Product Avatar Image") GitLab ](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_793034d14bb0f3fa12d97cf3cc0032c4/jira.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Jira ](https://www.g2.com/products/jira/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_c65522c8f7bacfdc0684fc8d26bba00d/mozilla-firefox.png "Product Avatar Image") Firefox ](https://www.g2.com/products/mozilla-firefox/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_fd527e1fc777d9e31b2a28e8d3c959a4/postman.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Postman ](https://www.g2.com/products/postman/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/integrations) **Indusface WAS** Not enough data Screenshots **Burp Suite** No screenshot available **Indusface WAS** ![Indusface WAS screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/170593/indusfaceWAS-summary.PNG) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Burp Suite** **9.4** /10 Based on 112 responses **Indusface WAS** **9.1** /10 Based on 53 responses Ease of Use **Burp Suite** **8.8** /10 Based on 115 responses **Indusface WAS** **9.0** /10 Based on 51 responses Ease of Setup **Burp Suite** **9.3** /10 Based on 50 responses **Indusface WAS** **9.0** /10 Based on 36 responses Ease of Admin **Burp Suite** **9.1** /10 Based on 29 responses **Indusface WAS** **8.9** /10 Based on 29 responses Quality of Support **Burp Suite** **8.6** /10 Based on 100 responses **Indusface WAS** **9.5** /10 Based on 49 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Burp Suite** **9.7** /10 Based on 27 responses **Indusface WAS** **9.4** /10 Based on 27 responses Product Direction (% positive) **Burp Suite** **9.2** /10 Based on 111 responses **Indusface WAS** **8.8** /10 Based on 49 responses **Features** ratings from reviews Penetration Testing **9.2** /10 Based on 26 responses **9.1** /10 Based on 36 responses Vulnerability Scanner **8.1** /10 Based on 84 responses **8.9** /10 Based on 36 responses Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Not enough data **9.2** /10 Based on 20 responses User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 33.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 39.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 27.1% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 33.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 39.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 27.1% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 50.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 37.5% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 12.5% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 50.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 37.5% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 12.5% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Burp Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1084a0792dcd7344d19c56aea015669c/burp-suite.svg "Burp Suite")](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) Burp Suite Computer & Network Security 28.0% Information Technology and Services 28.0% Computer Software 14.4% Financial Services 4.5% Retail 3.0% Other 22.0% [![Indusface WAS](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/f8bee825b124feee32c60481e2bfe3ee/indusface-was.svg "Indusface WAS")](https://www.g2.com/products/indusface-was/reviews) Indusface WAS Computer Software 28.1% Information Technology and Services 20.3% Financial Services 9.4% Computer & Network Security 6.3% Banking 3.1% Other 32.8% Alternatives **Burp Suite Alternatives** ![Intruder](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1539808658/intruder.svg "Intruder") [ Intruder ](/products/intruder/reviews) ![Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8b9bbc1b8758727122569ca626a30959/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix.svg "Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)") [ Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix) ](/products/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix/reviews) ![Invicti](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3bee4d2b732dab5368b9a8aa21f05e30/invicti.svg "Invicti") [ Invicti ](/products/invicti/reviews) ![Veracode Application Security Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d30c215643c0b745ba4951ab20b60121/veracode-application-security-platform.svg "Veracode Application Security Platform") [ Veracode Application... ](/products/veracode-application-security-platform/reviews) **Indusface WAS Alternatives** ![GitLab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2397ccd7309ef2bca71e3a275d59a5a3/gitlab.svg "GitLab") [ GitLab ](/products/gitlab/reviews) ![Tenable Nessus](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/127e03b7d601741c15306f07b0f8cf84/tenable-nessus.svg "Tenable Nessus") [ Tenable Nessus ](/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) ![Wiz](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/991dbad301661dc9e1b78a7e252252b4/wiz-wiz.svg "Wiz") [ Wiz ](/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) ![Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_7b1e34d1cfcc265beee0d9b4290461fa/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform.jpg "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform") [ Red Hat Ansible Automation... ](/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) ## Burp Suite vs Indusface WAS FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 16, 2026 ### What is the difference between Indusface WAS vs Burp Suite? Burp Suite stands out for its higher G2 rating and reviewer-cited integration capabilities, while Indusface WAS is recognized for its strong customer support and vulnerability detection. | [Indusface WAS](https://www.g2.com/products/indusface-was/reviews) | [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.6/5 (68 reviews) | 4.8/5 (129 reviews) | | Mid-Market | Mid-Market | | 9.0 | 9.3 | | 9.5 | 8.7 | | Vulnerability Detection (19 all-time mentions) | Integration Capabilities (4 all-time mentions) | ### How do the pricing models of Indusface WAS and Burp Suite compare? Indusface WAS is rated higher for price satisfaction, making it the stronger value compared to Burp Suite. - **Indusface WAS:** In recent reviews, several buyers highlight its cost-effectiveness and affordability for compliance-driven security needs. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers frequently cite the high price of the Professional edition as a barrier, especially for small teams and individual researchers. ### What are the best alternatives to Indusface WAS and Burp Suite? The best alternatives to Indusface WAS and Burp Suite are Intruder, GitLab, and Acunetix by Invicti. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Indusface WAS](https://www.g2.com/products/indusface-was/reviews) | 4.6/5 (68 reviews) | Mid-Market | In recent reviews, buyers describe it as cost-effective for compliance needs. | Vulnerability Detection (19 all-time mentions) | | [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) | 4.8/5 (129 reviews) | Mid-Market | Reviewers frequently cite the high price of the Professional edition. | Integration Capabilities (4 all-time mentions) | | [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews) | 4.8/5 (209 reviews) | — | — | — | | [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) | 4.5/5 (902 reviews) | Small-Business | — | — | | [Acunetix by Invicti](https://www.g2.com/products/acunetix-by-invicti/reviews) | 4.1/5 (105 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — | ### Which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) features should I prioritize when comparing Indusface WAS and Burp Suite? Buyers should prioritize integrations, vulnerability detection accuracy, customer support, automated scanning, and reporting quality when comparing Indusface WAS and Burp Suite. - **Integrations:** Burp Suite: Integration Capabilities (4 all-time mentions); Indusface WAS: — - **Vulnerability Detection Accuracy:** Indusface WAS: Vulnerability Detection (19 all-time mentions), Accuracy of Results (5 all-time mentions); Burp Suite: Vulnerability Identification (4 all-time mentions) - **Customer Support:** Indusface WAS: Customer Support (6 all-time mentions), Quality of Support score 9.5; Burp Suite: Customer Support (2 all-time mentions), Quality of Support score 8.7 - **Automated Scanning:** Indusface WAS: Automated Scanning (5 all-time mentions); Burp Suite: Automated Scanning (2 all-time mentions) - **Reporting Quality:** Indusface WAS: Reporting Quality (4 all-time mentions); Burp Suite: Detailed Information (2 all-time mentions) ### What are the pros and cons of Indusface WAS vs Burp Suite? Indusface WAS is strongest in customer support and vulnerability detection, while Burp Suite excels in integration capabilities and manual testing features. - **Indusface WAS strengths:** Vulnerability Detection (19 all-time mentions), Customer Support (6 all-time mentions), Scanning Efficiency (6 all-time mentions), Security (6 all-time mentions), Accuracy of Results (5 all-time mentions), Automated Scanning (5 all-time mentions), Pentesting Efficiency (5 all-time mentions), Risk Management (5 all-time mentions), Ease of Use (4 all-time mentions), Reliability (4 all-time mentions), Reporting Quality (4 all-time mentions), Team Expertise (4 all-time mentions), User Interface (4 all-time mentions) - **Indusface WAS trade-offs:** In recent reviews, some buyers mention limited features in the free version and desire for more CI/CD integrations. - **Burp Suite strengths:** Ease of Use (12 all-time mentions), User Interface (8 all-time mentions), Testing Services (7 all-time mentions), Features (5 all-time mentions), Integration Capabilities (4 all-time mentions), Vulnerability Identification (4 all-time mentions), Tool Efficiency (3 all-time mentions), Automated Scanning (2 all-time mentions), Automation (2 all-time mentions) - **Burp Suite trade-offs:** Expensive (5 all-time mentions), Slow Performance (5 all-time mentions), High Learning Curve (2 all-time mentions), Limited Customization (2 all-time mentions) ### Is Indusface WAS or Burp Suite better for small businesses? Indusface WAS is a better fit for small businesses based on reviewer sentiment and its cost-effectiveness for compliance needs. - **Indusface WAS:** Largest segment is Mid-Market, but recent reviews highlight its affordability and ease of use for smaller organizations. - **Burp Suite:** Largest segment is Mid-Market, and reviewers frequently cite the high price of the Professional edition as a barrier for small businesses. ### Which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) platform has better integrations? Burp Suite is favored for integrations, with reviewers highlighting its extension ecosystem and integration capabilities. - **Indusface WAS:** In recent reviews, buyers express a desire for more CI/CD pipeline integrations, but no specific third-party integrations are cited. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers mention integrations with Postman and highlight the BApp Store extension ecosystem (4 all-time mentions for integration capabilities). ### How do Indusface WAS and Burp Suite compare on customer support? Indusface WAS outperforms Burp Suite on Quality of Support by a material margin of 0.8 points (9.5 vs 8.7). - **Indusface WAS:** Reviewers consistently praise responsive and knowledgeable support, with 6 all-time mentions for customer support and multiple recent reviews citing quick turnaround times and expert guidance. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers note good documentation and community resources, but fewer recent reviews highlight direct support experiences (2 all-time mentions for customer support). ### Which is easier to implement, Indusface WAS or Burp Suite? Burp Suite and Indusface WAS are rated at parity on Ease of Setup, with scores of 9.3 and 9.0 respectively, indicating both are easy to implement. - **Indusface WAS:** Recent reviews highlight a streamlined onboarding process and intuitive portal, with multiple reviewers rating setup as straightforward. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers describe the setup as easy and user-friendly, with several noting minimal configuration required to get started. ### Which product has better False Positives? Indusface WAS is favored for minimizing false positives, with reviewers citing a zero false positives guarantee and multiple mentions of accuracy. - **Indusface WAS:** False Positives (3 all-time mentions), Accuracy of Results (5 all-time mentions), reviewers highlight a zero false positives guarantee and time savings from not having to triage inaccurate findings. - **Burp Suite:** Reviewers note that false positives still occur and require manual verification, with several recent reviews mentioning the need to validate scanner findings before reporting. ## Burp Suite vs Indusface WAS When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Indusface WAS easier to use. However, Burp Suite is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Burp Suite overall. - Reviewers felt that Burp Suite meets the needs of their business better than Indusface WAS. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Indusface WAS is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Burp Suite over Indusface WAS.