Compare Built for Teams and Simplicant
See this
side-by-side comparison of Built for Teams vs. Simplicant
based on preference data from user reviews. Built for Teams rates 4.5/5 stars with 27 reviews. By contrast, Simplicant rates 4.9/5 stars with 16 reviews. Each product's score is calculated with real-time data from verified user reviews, to help you make the best choice between these two options, and decide which one is best for your business needs.
 Built for Teams |  Simplicant | |
| Star Rating | Built for Teams | Simplicant |
| Market Segments | Built for Teams Small-Business (64.0% of reviews) | Simplicant Mid-Market (60.0% of reviews) |
| Entry Level Price | Built for Teams Free | Simplicant No pricing information available |
Built for Teams vs Simplicant
- Reviewers felt that Simplicant meets the needs of their business better than Built for Teams.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Simplicant is the preferred option.
- When assessing product direction, Built for Teams and Simplicant received similar ratings from our reviewers.
Categories
Shared Categories
Built for Teams and Simplicant are categorized as Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
Unique Categories
Built for Teams is categorized as Org Chart, Absence Management, Time & Attendance, Workforce Management, and Core HR
Simplicant is categorized as Recruitment Marketing
Pricing
Free
Free
Chart Your Org
$1per employee / month
Manage Your Org
$3per employee / month
Grow Your Org
$5per employee / month
Free Trial Unavailable
‐
‐
‐
‐
Free Trial
Ratings
Meets Requirements
Built for Teams
Responses: 24
Simplicant
Responses: 11
Ease of Use
Built for Teams
Responses: 24
Simplicant
Responses: 11
Ease of Setup
Built for Teams
Responses: 9
Simplicant
Not enough data availableEase of Admin
Built for Teams
Responses: 9
Simplicant
Not enough data availableQuality of Support
Built for Teams
Responses: 20
Simplicant
Responses: 11
Ease of Doing Business With
Built for Teams
Responses: 8
Simplicant
Not enough data availableProduct Direction (% positive)
Built for Teams
Responses: 22
Simplicant
Responses: 11
Features
Sourcing
Social Sourcing
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Job Posting
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Candidate Sourcing Metrics
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Candidate Search
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Career Page Configuration
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Candidate Management
Dashboards
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Workflow Building
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Hiring Processes Tracking
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Scheduling
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Applicant Data Management
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Responses: 5
Candidate Evaluations
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Automated Resume Parsing
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Candidate-Facing Statuses
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Platform
Customization
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Integration APIs
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Internationalization
Built for Teams
Simplicant
User, Role, and Access Management
Built for Teams
Responses: 7
Simplicant
Performance
Built for Teams
Responses: 7
Simplicant
Mobility
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Reporting
Built for Teams
Responses: 6
Simplicant
Dashboards
Built for Teams
Responses: 7
Simplicant
Reviewers' Company Size
Reviewers of Built for Teams were most often representing companies in the Small-Business segment, while reviewers for Simplicant were more commonly in the Mid-Market segment.
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Built for Teams
Simplicant
Reviewers' Industry
Consumer Goods
15.4%
Computer Software
15.4%
Marketing and Advertising
7.7%
Internet
7.7%
Education Management
7.7%
Other
46.2%
Computer Software
53.3%
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Pharmaceuticals
6.7%
Human Resources
6.7%
‐
Other
0.0%
Reviews
Most Helpful Favorable Review
User in Marketing and Advertising
It's easy to request time off without the hassle of paperwork and waiting for approval. It is easy to recognize how much time you have available with the different segments noting sick, vacation, and personal time. It is a great visual dashboard for time...
asad t.
User in Information Technology and Services
Very responsive and user friendly. No need for detailed training and manuals. Very simple and to the point.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Administrator in Insurance
Doesn't have time keeping or payroll integration and reports are very basic
Hashir R.
User in Human Resources
I haven't experienced any thing bad about it so far.
Top Alternatives
Discussions
Built for Teams has no discussions with answers
Simplicant has no discussions with answers
Learning about Business Software?
Ask the community
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy